ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
Text |
 |
69158
|
Mon Jun 8 08:29:16 2020 |
| pierre brionnet | pierre.brionnet@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.4-4936b76 | Re: email notification for self register 2 3 and 4 | Hi Stefan, I did run in verbose mode but
only got this output with the 587 SMTP port
from gmail |
|
69157
|
Mon Jun 8 08:11:33 2020 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.4-4936b76 | Re: email notification for self register 2 3 and 4 | Why don't you start elogd interactively
with the "-v" flag (verbose) and
watch the communication between elog and |
|
69156
|
Mon Jun 8 07:30:06 2020 |
| pierre brionnet | pierre.brionnet@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.4-4936b76 | email notification for self register 2 3 and 4 | Hi,
I have set up my elog for testing
and setup postfix to be able to send email |
|
69155
|
Fri Jun 5 13:24:01 2020 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.4-2 | Re: SSL does not work | When you compile elog from the soruces,
you need the OpenSSL library to be installed.
The CMake build process will then find it |
|
69154
|
Fri Jun 5 03:49:20 2020 |
| Hisataka YOSHIDA | hisataka@rcnp.osaka-u.ac.jp | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.4-2 | SSL does not work | Hello.
I installed the latest elog (3.1.4-2)
in CentOS 7, and it is working well without |
|
69153
|
Fri May 29 09:27:32 2020 |
| Jan Just Keijser | janjust@nikhef.nl | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.4-2 | "New User" option does not work when Authentication=Webserver | Our setup uses "Authentication=Webserver"
+ no automatic user registration. Thus, logbook
admins should add a user by clicking "Config" |
|
69152
|
Sat May 23 16:15:38 2020 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Windows | V3.1.4-80633ba | Re: Record ID corruption | Hi Frank,
Good bit of detective work.
To me it suggests that something as yet undetermined |
|
69151
|
Fri May 22 21:03:05 2020 |
| Frank Baptista | caffeinejazz@gmail.com | Question | Windows | V3.1.4-80633ba | Re: Record ID corruption | Hi David,
Well, you've made some very
interesting observations, and raised some |
|