ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
193
|
Sat Jan 11 18:09:04 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: logbook db size causing very slow response |
> Was wondering if there were any tweaks/suggestions for improving the
> logbooks responsiviness. Our logbook was started 31 July 01. Since that
> time we have went from 1 logbook to 4 logbooks. Logbook 1 having 2651
> entries, logbook 2 having 300 entries, and the last 2 are new logbooks, so
> only a few entries.
Another trick for large logbooks is to divide them into a logbook with
recent entries and one with old entries (archive), like I did now in this
forum. One can enable the "copy to" command for the administrator, who then
can copy regularly old entries to the archive, keeping the recent logkook
reasonable small with a good responsiviness. If one wants to search then the
old messages, one can still go to the archive, but then the search command
takes longer. |
196
|
Mon Jan 13 11:43:37 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | | | Re: 'group' option in conflict with 'guest logic' and 'LogBook Tabs' option |
> small problem :
> ****************
> Logbook Tabs = 0 in the guest logbook will close the group header
> may be create a parameter to solve ?
> GroupGuest Extranet = ....
What I would recommend in that case is to run two copies of elogd in
parallel, one for the public and one for the private section. They can even
run on differnt ports so the firewall can block the private section. If the
private logbooks are not defined in the public elogd, they don't show up in
the logbook tabs, so only the publick logbook tabs are seen. Please note
that two elogd daemons should not have concurrent write access to the same
logbook, since there is not locking and the logbook could get messed up that
way. So only one elogd should have write access to any logbook.
- Stefan |
197
|
Mon Jan 13 11:45:18 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | | | Re: call a shell from ELOG / new button [Submit & Notify] |
I put this on the wish list.
- Stefan |
199
|
Fri Jan 24 12:24:18 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | | | Re: confused name in the attributes section |
> do not use confused name in attributes
> **************************************
> like
> Attributes Type, Type2
> the info on Type2 will be placed in the Type also
> see attachment 1
>
> Never use confused name like '
> Attributes PC_Memory, Memory
I acknowledge the problem. It had to do with the fact that for checkbox
options, the first checkbox is submitted in the above case as "Type0", the
second as "Type1", and the third as "Type2" which conficts with the other
attribute. I fixed that and use now "Type#0" and so on which should be fine.
The fix will be included in V2.2.6.
Stefan |
201
|
Fri Jan 31 09:49:43 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | | | Re: Write only |
> I'm interested using elog for a lab notebook. Once entries have been
> entered they cannot be changed/edited.
> Is it possible for elog to be setup to support something like this? A write
> only mode?
What you need is an entry in the elogd.cfg file:
Manu commands = Back, New, Reply, Find, Config, Logout, Help
As you see, the "Edit" and "Delete" commands are missing here and therefore
do not get displayed. So you can enter a message with "New", but you cannot
change it afterwards. |
203
|
Fri Jan 31 21:09:47 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | | | Re: Write only |
> Does this truly disable the edit command or just hide it?
You're right! In some earlier versions, it did disable it, but in 2.2.5 it
just hides it. I fixed that bug and from 2.3.0 on it will really disable
that command again, such that if someone enters manually
http://midas.psi.ch/elogdemo/Forum/202?cmd=Edit
will produce and error if the command is not in the menu list. |
205
|
Thu Feb 6 15:46:11 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Author attribute as a Quick Filter? |
> When ELOG is configured for Self-Register=3, is it still possible
> to use the Author attribute as a Quick Filter?
>
> When I try it, the Author drop down box doesn't display anything.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
The "Quick Filter" facility only works for attributes which are avaiable as
an "Options <attribute> = ..." list. So if you have a "free" attribute like
the author, the systen would have to scan the whole logbook to find all
possible authors, which would result in some unacceptable performance
degradation. Nevertheless, in systems with a limited number of authors one
can add the "options author = ..." statement to get the selection box. The
behaviour is independent of the "Self-Register" setting. |
207
|
Fri Feb 7 19:52:41 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Lost features since upgrade to 2.3.0 |
> Problem 1 - Since upgrading to version 2.3.0 I seem to have lost the some
> functionality explained below. When i first log into my logbook (i only
> have a single one) it defaults to the summary view and the first field is
> one called Customer Name as opposed to # as i wanted the list sorted by
> this field, the link for that logbook entry is no longer available on the
> first field (being Customer Name) but only on the # field), however if you
> use Summary threaded view the whole line is a link.
I revised the way links are placed into the summary table, so I could have
lost some functionality (I did not try all config combinations since there
are too many now). So I can fix your problem in two ways now: Either always
have the first item in a list be a link, or have each item be the (same)
link. What do you think is a better solution?
> Problem 2 - no matter what i try in the config file i cannot get elogd to
> use stylesheets ive tried specifying and even editing and removing the
> default.css style sheet i downloaded but it just seems to ignore its there.
First question: Does your elog pages have color? If so, the default.css is
loaded correctly. Otherwise your page would contain text but all would be
white.
So I presume you see color, that means your default.css is loaded correctly.
It can now be that your browser caches that stylesheet. I use MS Internet
Explorer and Mozilla and a "reload" on the browsers refreshes the
stylesheet, but you really have to press the "reload" button (or clear the
browser cache). Have you tried that?
- Stefan |