Paid version , posted by Vasio on Mon Jul 4 12:34:13 2022
|
Good day all ,
does Elog has a paid version that is not open soureced
|
Re: Paid version , posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jul 7 10:56:39 2022
|
There is only an open source version.
Vasio
wrote:
Good day all , |
Paid version , posted by Vasio on Mon Jul 4 12:32:01 2022
|
Good day all ,
does Elog has a paid version that is not open soureced
|
|
Slow performance, posted by Alan Grant on Tue Jun 28 18:53:50 2022
|
We're up to 30 logbooks, 3.2GB data total and Elog damen has now become slow. Performance stats show 100%CPU on startup then reduces. Searches and
general UI activity is slow. It runs on a VM with 4GB memory allocated. Up to 15 concurrent users.
Trimming and archiving some data files may help but I gather overall this is underpowered hardware in this instance so what is recommended |
|
Re: Slow performance, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Sat Jul 2 14:39:41 2022
|
We have 68 logbooks and currently 60 GB data total. We run it as well on a VM, in our case with 8GB RAM.
The speed of ELOG is mostly given by the filesystem: when we had AFS it was very slow. With NFS it was better. But we now use a local disk
on the VM: that is much better. |
|
Edit entry from command line and appending attachment, posted by Andrea Capra on Sun Jun 26 01:47:02 2022
|
I would like to edit an existing entry by adding new attachments at each call of elog
from the command line.
If I issue |
ladp Invalid user name or password!, posted by Fred Nerks on Wed May 11 09:54:17 2022
|
Hi I am running elog on windows 2022 server and trying to use ldap for Auth.
No matter what i do I cannot get it to authenticate against the DC.
Invalid user name or password! |
|
Re: ladp Invalid user name or password!, posted by Fred Nerks on Mon May 23 07:48:40 2022
|
Fred
Nerks wrote:
Hi I am running elog on windows 2022 server and trying to use ldap |
PDF preview special steps to enable, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Fri May 6 21:12:11 2022
|
Ubuntu LTS 20.04 and others have elog PDF preview disabled by default. To enable,
please follow these steps, see https://daq00.triumf.ca/DaqWiki/index.php/Ubuntu#Enable_elog_PDF_preview
|
Re: PDF preview special steps to enable, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue May 10 22:40:26 2022 
|
I have a PDF file created by root which ImageMagic cannot convert to a .png file. If I do
convert img.pdf img.png
|
|
elog root path, posted by Antonio Bulgheroni on Thu May 5 11:14:20 2022
|
Dear all,
I have a question for you. On my elog server I have plenty of images not included in any logbook entry, but that nevertheless I would the user
to have access to that via the browser. In order words, I would like to have a link like this https://myelog/my_pics_folder/my_pic.png |
|
Vulnerability?, posted by Alessandro Petrolini on Thu Mar 3 08:26:40 2022
|
Hi, I have been using elog for years at CERN.
Now I installed in my local workstation at my home inistitue
and sysadmin reported the following vulnerabilities: |
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Thu Mar 3 16:49:40 2022
|
The CVEs you refer to are very old and have been fixed a long time ago.
Please refer to:
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Alessandro Petrolini on Fri Mar 4 08:51:24 2022
|
Ok, many many thanks!
I will pass the info to my sysadmin.
Best Regards.
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Alessandro Petrolini on Sun Mar 6 09:00:33 2022
|
> Ok, many many thanks!
> I will pass the info to my sysadmin.
> Best Regards.
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Sun Mar 6 17:33:04 2022
|
> > > The CVEs you refer to are very old and have been fixed a long time ago.
>
> Am I wrong that the windows executable version on the site is dated 2018? 3.1.4-2?
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Mar 7 08:49:41 2022
|
> I trust Stefan is reading this thread and will do something about it. My vote would
> be to remove the download link to the windows executables and ask Debian to remove
> the elog package. I think they have a way for upstream developers (Stefan) to request
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Daniel Pfuhl on Mon Mar 7 14:30:16 2022
|
>
> Yeah, I have to recompile the Windows version. Unfortunately my old Windows PC is gone, I
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Mon Mar 7 17:46:39 2022
|
> > I trust Stefan is reading this thread and will do something about it. My vote would
> > be to remove the download link to the windows executables and ask Debian to remove
> > the elog package. I think they have a way for upstream developers (Stefan) to request
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Wed Mar 9 17:55:31 2022
|
I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables |
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Daniel Pfuhl on Tue Apr 19 15:47:59 2022
|
> I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
> Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
> I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Tue Apr 19 17:02:57 2022
|
> > I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
> > Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
> > I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Daniel Pfuhl on Tue Apr 19 20:13:04 2022
|
> > > I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
> > > Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
> > > I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Fri Apr 22 17:10:24 2022
|
> > > > I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
> > > > Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
> > > > I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Laurent Jean-Rigaud on Mon Mar 7 22:07:54 2022
|
> > I trust Stefan is reading this thread and will do something about it. My vote would
> > be to remove the download link to the windows executables and ask Debian to remove
> > the elog package. I think they have a way for upstream developers (Stefan) to request
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Florian Heigl on Mon Apr 18 19:16:36 2022
|
> > I trust Stefan is reading this thread and will do something about it. My vote would
> > be to remove the download link to the windows executables and ask Debian to remove
> > the elog package. I think they have a way for upstream developers (Stefan) to request
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Tue Apr 19 21:15:19 2022
|
> it would be good if the current state was listed in https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Vulnerabilities/
> It seems there's now updated builds for at least windows
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Fri Apr 22 21:15:37 2022
|
> > debian package still outdated?
> We reached to the package maintainer
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Tue Apr 26 17:39:49 2022
|
> > > debian package still outdated?
> removed from debian-unstable
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/elog
|
|
history of long-removed freebsd package, Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Tue Apr 26 18:03:03 2022
|
> > > > debian package still outdated?
the freebsd elog package was removed back in 2014 during
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Wed Apr 27 19:36:25 2022
|
> next is to request removal of ubuntu package.
contacted ubuntu security team, got very quick response.
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Fri Apr 22 12:55:21 2022
|
> it would be good if the current state was listed in https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Vulnerabilities/
> It seems there's now updated builds for at least windows, and the debian package still outdated?
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Sat Apr 23 18:05:57 2022
|
> The CVEs you refer to are very old and have been fixed a long time ago.
>
> Please refer to:
|