conditional options are not working in find , posted by Arno Teunisse on Sat Apr 5 13:56:42 2008
|
Hello
In my config file I have the following :
Options Head = AIX61{1},AIX53{2}, AIX52{3},HMC{4},CL_CLUSTER{5},VIRTUALIZATION{6},MICROCODE{7},BG_BLUEGENE{8} |
Re: conditional options are not working in find , posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 17 22:17:05 2008
|
Arno Teunisse wrote:
Would be nice if the user can search with the same items he used entering the data into the form. |
|
Re: conditional options are not working in find , posted by Arno Teunisse on Thu Apr 17 22:40:12 2008
|
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: conditional options are not working in find , posted by Arno Teunisse on Thu Apr 17 23:20:50 2008
|
Arno
Teunisse wrote:
|
|
Re: conditional options are not working in find , posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Apr 18 07:47:54 2008
|
Arno Teunisse wrote:
Just noticed that in IExplorer and Firefox when creating a new entrie i got a popup with the following text in it |
|
Re: conditional options are not working in find , posted by Arno Teunisse on Fri Apr 18 20:30:12 2008
|
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
|
Problems with elog client, posted by Yoshio Imai on Wed Apr 9 14:41:12 2008
|
Hi!
Since our upgrade to elog 2.7.3, it is not possible any more to edit an existing elog entry using the elog client with -e <id> option. |
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 9 23:03:53 2008
|
Yoshio Imai wrote:
Since our upgrade to elog 2.7.3, it is not possible any more to edit an existing elog entry using the elog |
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Yoshio Imai on Thu Apr 10 14:21:13 2008
|
I have tried the new revision, recompiling both client and server.
Unfortunately, the overall situation has not changed. We can still create new entries using the [I]elog[/I] client, but editing an existing entry still
does not work. However, thanks to your patch, the [I]-v[/I] option now works again for the client side:
|
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 10 15:39:26 2008
|
[quote="Yoshio Imai"]
[CODE]> elog -s -h elog -p 443 -l current -u <user> <password> -e 1 "EDIT THIS ENTRY" -v
Successfully connected to host elog, port 443
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Yoshio Imai on Thu Apr 10 15:56:12 2008
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]As I wrote in my previous message, the "SSL part has not been tested" (=means: does not work).[/quote]
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I was probably confused because the creation of new entries already worked, even with SSL.
|
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 15 20:34:49 2008
|
[quote="Yoshio Imai"]Another thing: I have noticed that when using conditional preset texts, the "Preset Text =" statements have to be declared for each
logbook of a logbook group; it is not sufficient to only declare it in the "[global]" section of the logbook group. This means that we only need to declare
the conditions once, e.g.
|
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Yoshio Imai on Thu Apr 17 19:11:36 2008
|
I have tried your sample config file, and this one also works for me.
The problem arises when using top groups. I have produced a minimal config file including a top group, of the form
[CODE]
|
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 17 21:23:06 2008
|
[quote="Yoshio Imai"]The problem arises when using top groups.[/quote]
Uff, that was a tough one. Thanks to your detailed analysis I could reproduce the problem. It indeed only happens with conditional 'preset text' under |
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Yoshio Imai on Fri Apr 18 14:17:52 2008
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]I fixed that in SVN revision 2103, please download and test it.[/quote]
I just downloaded and tested it. It works!!
|
Custom Links in each column, in the display list?, posted by Don Perrea on Thu Apr 17 19:56:41 2008
|
Using the "Link Display =" I can turn of the link to each individual entry, however, I would like to have a custom link in one
of my columns. Is this possible?
|
Re: Custom Links in each column, in the display list?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 17 20:22:30 2008 
|
Don Perrea wrote:
Using the "Link Display =" I can turn of the link to each individual entry, however, |
|
Sticky entries?, posted by Peter Freeman on Sun Apr 6 06:17:00 2008
|
Hi, I'm evaluate currently if we can use ELOG as an shiftbook. So far I like ELOG very much, but I got a question.
Is it possible to have sticky message entries? Entries that always show up on top of the others. Thats for important entries that
are valit for multiple shifts. |
|
Re: Sticky entries?, posted by Peter Freeman on Thu Apr 10 01:33:07 2008
|
Peter
Freeman wrote:
Hi, I'm evaluate |
|
Re: Sticky entries?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 10 07:48:08 2008
|
Peter Freeman wrote:
|
|
Re: Sticky entries?, posted by Peter Freeman on Fri Apr 11 00:15:42 2008
|
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Sticky entries?, posted by Peter Freeman on Sat Apr 12 05:21:11 2008
|
Peter
Freeman wrote:
|
|
Re: Sticky entries?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Apr 14 08:46:41 2008
|
Peter Freeman wrote:
EDIT: Just downloaded the latest version and |
attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Dennis Seitz on Tue Apr 1 21:24:17 2008
|
It would be nice to have the option of including an attachment indicator column in summary view to show if an entry has any attachments.
Thanks. |
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Apr 4 22:06:48 2008
|
Dennis Seitz wrote:
It would be nice to have the option of including an attachment indicator column in summary view to show if |
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Edmundo T Rodriguez on Fri Apr 4 22:53:17 2008
|
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Apr 7 10:01:27 2008
|
Edmundo T Rodriguez wrote:
|
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Dennis Seitz on Sat Apr 5 00:43:21 2008
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Grant Jeffcote on Sat Apr 12 22:04:58 2008
|
Hi Stefan,
When using 2.7.3-2095 I can't seem to get the paperclip/s to show, just an additional field in the summary view (named Attachments)
with the attachment file names below? Am I missing something? |
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sun Apr 13 16:04:09 2008
|
Grant Jeffcote wrote:
When using 2.7.3-2095 I can't seem to get the paperclip/s to show, just an additional field in the summary |
|
Manual installing elog as service on Windows, posted by Arno Teunisse on Sat Apr 12 16:37:44 2008
|
Hello
Sometimes it can come in handy to start a temporary elog service on the Windows platform. ( Maybe for testing purposes )
You can use the SC.exe utility to do that. If it is not on you're system you may download it from : ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/reskit/win2000/sc.zip |
|
e-mail format, posted by Bill Qualls on Tue Apr 1 21:07:39 2008
|
I "upgraded" from v2.6.? to v2.7.3. By "upgrade", I mean "copy all files to a different computer, then run the
installer". e-mail messages received from my v2.6 instance look nice. The messages look like HTML tables with blue and green coloring.
My v2.7 instance appears to send plain text. But, when I forward the v2.7 message, the nice HTML tables appear again. Is there an e-mail formatting |
|
Re: e-mail format, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 3 08:37:27 2008
|
Bill Qualls wrote:
I "upgraded" from v2.6.? to v2.7.3. By "upgrade", I mean "copy all |
|
FCKeditor not active, posted by Kevin O'Sullivan on Mon Mar 24 19:40:03 2008
|
I'm using ELOG version 2.7.3-2058 and have been trying to get FCKeditor to work. This, to my understanding from the documentation, is supposed to be
a part of elog by default after version 2.7.0 and from looking at the configuration syntax manual, it looks as though FCKeditor should be on with the default
settings. I done nothing to turn it off and none of the obvious fixes seem to do anything. I've posted the text of my configuration file below, what did |
|
Re: FCKeditor not active, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Mar 27 07:15:03 2008
|
Kevin O'Sullivan wrote:
I'm using ELOG version 2.7.3-2058 and have been trying to get FCKeditor to work. This, to my understanding |
|
Re: FCKeditor not active, posted by Alain Hugentobler on Wed Apr 2 01:27:20 2008
|
Kevin O'Sullivan wrote:
I'm using ELOG version 2.7.3-2058 and have been trying to get FCKeditor to work. This, to my understanding |
|
Re: FCKeditor not active, posted by Kevin O'Sullivan on Wed Apr 2 03:34:43 2008
|
Alain Hugentobler wrote:
|
|
Re: FCKeditor not active, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 2 09:19:55 2008
|
Alain Hugentobler wrote:
|