| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1042
|
Wed Mar 30 17:11:33 2005 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | V2.5.8-1 | Re: Preset text Dont work more! |
> I've change my Attribute "Maint." to "Maint" in my elogd.cfg and in my Logbook too
> but the problem is the same, I have restarted the service but the problem is still
> here. Any idea? o_O
Have you upgraded to 2.5.8-2 ? After the upgrade, "Maint." (with the dot) should also work. |
|
1044
|
Thu Mar 31 09:46:21 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | V2.5.8-2 | Re: Preset text Dont work more! |
> Yes I have upgraded Elog to 2.5.8-2.
> I submit my new elogd.cfg file maybe it will help you.
> I have try the preset text under Firefox (the last), avant browser 10.0
> (build 165) and IE 6 SP1.
I tested your config file under Firefox (the last) and it worked fine. On the
"Liste Routeurs & Firewall", I click "New", then select FWL1, then see the text
"FLW1.txt" in the main body. I don't have that file, so elog by default just
shows the file name.
I also realized that you have double entries in your config file (like two
"Attributes = " and "Options Type = " lines. However this should not be a
problem, elog just chooses the first one.
If your preset text does not work, it could be that you have switched off
JavaScript. In Firefow, you can open the JavaScript console (Tools/JavaScript
console). Maybe you see any error there.
- Stefan |
|
1047
|
Thu Mar 31 16:31:41 2005 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.5.8-2 | Re: Want to change Entry time when using Copy To |
> What I want is to have the Entry time to be updated to the time it was
> copyed, not the original entry time. Moved To should perhaps retain its
> original time?
You can achieve that by using "Edit", and then check "Resubmit as new entry",
then click "Submit".
- Stefan |
|
1049
|
Thu Mar 31 21:59:21 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.5.8-2 | Re: Want to change Entry time when using Copy To |
> The idea is good, but it does not work for me. What happens when I do this is
> that I get a new ID, but the old ID is deleted.... It disappears from the list,
> and if you try to access it manually it says that it is deleted.
Right, that how it's supposed to be. Same would happen if you move the entry. It's
deleted from the old place and resubmitted as a new entry. Otherwise you would have
your entry twice, and that is certainly not what you want. How come you access it
manually? If you access it through the list, everything should be fine. I even
update the references if there are replies to this entry, so the replies still
point to the right entry. |
|
1051
|
Thu Mar 31 22:15:34 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.5.8-2 | Re: Want to change Entry time when using Copy To |
> But I want a duplicate entry of the entry.... so that I can reuse the text and other
> items and just change the entrys that need to be changed.
>
> E.g, you have a work request from one user with some kind of solution on it, then you
> get a similar request from another user and you want to have almost the same
> information in a new entry. Then you just want to create a copy of the old case and
> change whatever needs to be changed.
>
> I'm not sure if you understand what I tries to do?
Now I understand. What you ask for is not possible right now, but I put it on the
wishlist. The best would be to add a new command "Duplicate" to the menu, which lets you
do exactly what you want. |
|
1053
|
Thu Mar 31 22:40:43 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.5.8-2 | Re: Want to change Entry time when using Copy To |
> or your idea is good as well.
Ok, I implemented a 'Duplicate' command (see this forum for example). I guess this is clearer
than modifying some of the existing functionality like 'resubmit' or 'copy to'. With 'copy to'
you probably want to keep all information from the original entry, including the submission
time, when you move it from one logbook into an other. So if we put an 'EntryUpdate Copy To',
this would not be possible any more. The new version is under CVS.
- Stefan |
|
1056
|
Tue Apr 5 22:45:22 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | | | | Re: HTML-File as attachement |
> When I upload a HTML-File as attachement the file is shown as the
> HTML-source and not as the formatted text. Is there a possibility to see the
> HTML-attachements as formatted text like images are shown as images?
I could turn the ASCII display off, but the result is not always what you want.
If you have a HTML file without the <html>, <header> and <body> tags, it's ok.
But if you have these tags in your HTML (and this is the normal case), the
resulting page has these tags twice, once from the ELOG page and once from the
attachment. This confuses some browsers, so the resulting page might look
strange. A solution would be to strip these tags from the attachment, but for
that I would have to interprete the HTML attachment completely, which is too
much work.
So I will turn the ASCII display off in the next release, but be prepared to see
some nonexpected results. |
|
1059
|
Wed Apr 6 14:56:09 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | | | | Re: HTML-File as attachement |
> Yesterday I mad a little experiment:
> I copied in OpenOffice the content from my HTML file, which was not shown correctly
> in ELOG, to a new HTML file, uploaded it in ELOG, and now my file was shown
> correctly formatted. The only one problem is that not all lines are shown, in the
> last line is written ...1753 more lines... . How can I show all lines? Do I have to
> recompile ELOG?
The reason for the "...1753 more lines..." is the following: Sometimes people upload
really huge files (10 MB or so). If they are displayed as ASCII attachments, each time
you access the entry you have to DOWNLOAD 10 MB. Sometimes even the browser crashes.
That's why I limited the display of the ASCII attachments to the first 1000 lines. To
see the complete file, just lick on the attachment name.
Concerning the inline display of HTML documents, I'm currently thinking of checking if
there is an <HTML> or <BODY> statement inside the file. If not, it might be just some
HTML fraction in which case it could be shown. If yes, it cannot be shown inline, but
if you click on it's name a new browser windows is opened containing the full document.
Does that sound reasonable to you? |