[261] problem with month selection, posted by Willem Koster on Fri Feb 3 11:54:22 2006
|
I have several date-fields defined in my logboek. But when I click the icon and select another month the pop-up
window get's filled with the contants of the logboek instead of the date-selection.
|
Re: [261] problem with month selection, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 6 12:52:09 2006
|
> I have several date-fields defined in my logboek. But when I click the icon and select another month the pop-up
> window get's filled with the contants of the logboek instead of the date-selection.
|
Running ELOG under Apache, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Mon Jan 30 11:41:18 2006
|
Hi,
Sorry if this has been asked elsewhere and I'm missing it. I want to stop users from accessing my elog by loading the URL: http://mycomputerURL:8080 and |
Re: Running ELOG under Apache, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jan 30 12:27:08 2006
|
[quote="Dimitrios Tsirigkas"]Sorry if this has been asked elsewhere and I'm missing it. I want to stop users from accessing my elog by loading the URL:
http://mycomputerURL:8080 and only make it accessible through http://mycomputerURL/elog. The end goal would be to use Apache to control access. I followed
the instructions under "Running elogd under Apache" in the admin guide, but what that did was simply to redirect browsers trying to load ttp://mycomputerURL/elog |
ELOG v2.6.0-beta5 (Windows) crashes while using " Forgot password?", posted by Edmundo T Rodriguez on Thu Nov 3 23:39:46 2005
|
The following ELOG behavior seems to be like a bug ...
-> Anybody click on "Forgot password?" in the login screen, to have the system
|
Re: ELOG v2.6.0-beta5 (Windows) crashes while using " Forgot password?", posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 7 09:25:59 2005
|
[quote="Edmundo T Rodriguez"]The following ELOG behavior seems to be like a bug ...
-> Anybody click on "Forgot password?" in the login screen, to have the system
|
Re: ELOG v2.6.0 (Linux) crashes while using " Forgot password?", posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Thu Jan 26 15:04:32 2006
|
Hi,
-> Anybody click on "Forgot password?" in the login screen, to have the system
|
Re: ELOG v2.6.0 (Linux) crashes while using " Forgot password?", posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 26 15:07:11 2006
|
[quote="Dimitrios Tsirigkas"]Is there going to be a fix for that version as well?[/quote]
A fix is always for all versions, since I have a common code base. Have you tried Version 2.6.1? |
Re: ELOG v2.6.0 (Linux) crashes while using " Forgot password?", posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Thu Jan 26 15:19:58 2006
|
A fix is always for all versions, since I have a common code base. Have you tried Version 2.6.1?[/quote]
I got the RPM last week, from the download page. When I run without the -D option it says that it is Version 2.6.0. Since a new version came out in the |
Re: ELOG v2.6.0 (Linux) crashes while using " Forgot password?", posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Mon Jan 30 10:21:41 2006
|
[quote="Dimitrios Tsirigkas"]A fix is always for all versions, since I have a common code base. Have you tried Version 2.6.1?[/quote]
Yep, 2.6.1 works fine. Thanks,
|
Running elog as ordinnary user, posted by G. Vandemoortele on Fri Jan 27 20:40:00 2006
|
Hello,
I've configured elog with some commands running a shell :
|
Re: Running elog as ordinnary user, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jan 27 23:18:07 2006
|
[quote="G. Vandemoortele"]I've configured elog with some commands running a shell :
Preset R-Date = $shell(/usr/bin/date +"%Y/%m/%d %H:%S")
|
Re: Running elog as ordinnary user, posted by G. Vandemoortele on Sat Jan 28 10:40:18 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
First of all, you could use
|
Re: Running elog as ordinnary user, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Jan 28 12:54:03 2006
|
[quote="G. Vandemoortele"]Started via root (# /usr/sbin/elogd -c /home/gv/.elog/elogd.cfg -x), it works,
but via "gv" ($ /usr/sbin/elogd -c /home/gv/.elog/elogd.cfg -x), it doesn't.[/quote]
|
Quicklink does not work for one field, posted by mark james on Mon Oct 24 12:00:51 2005
|
I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work. It is the "Spacecraft" field. When I select any 'Spacecraft' quicklink,
the no. of records stays exactly the same (i.e. no. in full recordset). If I select F1, then I see F1 highlight in yellow in the string "4F1". But strangely
the "F1" entries are not highlight. Very strange.
|
Re: Quicklink does not work for one field, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jan 18 12:15:17 2006
|
[quote="mark james"]I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work.[/quote]
Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release. |
Re: Quicklink does not work for one field, posted by mark james on Mon Jan 23 17:32:20 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="mark james"]I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work.[/quote]
Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release.[/quote]
|
Re: Quicklink does not work for one field, posted by mark james on Mon Jan 23 18:35:52 2006
|
[quote="mark james"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="mark james"]I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work.[/quote]
Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release.[/quote]
|
Re: Quicklink does not work for one field, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jan 24 08:11:13 2006
|
[quote="mark james"][quote="mark james"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="mark james"]I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields
just do not work.[/quote]
|
Re: Quicklink does not work for one field, posted by mark james on Fri Jan 27 13:50:10 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="mark james"][quote="mark james"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="mark james"]I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of
my Quicklink fields just do not work.[/quote]
|
Re: Quicklink does not work for one field, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jan 27 13:52:34 2006
|
[quote="mark james"]OK. But where do I get this from? The "latest version of 19 Jan is still 1622.[/quote]
If you can compile it yourself, you get it from Subversion (see [URL=/afs/pi.infn.it/group/mug/docs/talks/review_feb06/]here[/URL]). Otherwise you have |
Suggestion additional ElCodes, posted by T. Ribbrock on Tue Jan 24 14:43:19 2006
|
I have to say, now that I'm finally on 2.6.x, I grew really fond of the ElCode stuff - great addition! It saves a lot of straight HTML typing for me...
THANKS!
|
Re: Suggestion additional ElCodes, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jan 24 22:52:48 2006
|
[quote="T. Ribbrock"]However, there are two things I'm missing:
[LIST]
[*] [I]Headings[/I]
|
Re: Suggestion additional ElCodes, posted by T. Ribbrock on Wed Jan 25 12:31:14 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
Yes, I missed tables myself already. The headings I just put into the current SVN version (see this forum for how it works).
[/quote]
|
Attachments in duplicated entries, posted by Bertram Metz on Thu Dec 8 10:32:37 2005
|
Hi,
the [B]duplicate[/B] command duplicates the entry text itself, but it does not duplicate attachments.
|
Re: Attachments in duplicated entries, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Dec 21 20:54:11 2005
|
[quote="Bertram Metz"]The [B]duplicate[/B] command duplicates the entry text itself, but it does not duplicate attachments. If attachments in a duplicated
entry are deleted, the original attachment files are deleted as well and cannot be accessed anymore within the original entry.
|
Re: Attachments in duplicated entries, posted by Bertram Metz on Tue Jan 24 14:39:21 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Bertram Metz"]The [B]duplicate[/B] command duplicates the entry text itself, but it does not duplicate attachments. If attachments
in a duplicated entry are deleted, the original attachment files are deleted as well and cannot be accessed anymore within the original entry.
|
redirect errors via apache2, posted by djek on Mon Jan 23 10:30:51 2006
|
Since elog 2.6.0 we cannot redirect our elog via apache2.
in apache2.conf we have (had for a long time):
|
Re: redirect errors via apache2, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jan 23 10:57:45 2006
|
> Since elog 2.6.0 we cannot redirect our elog via apache2.
>
> in apache2.conf we have (had for a long time):
|
Re: redirect errors via apache2, posted by djek on Mon Jan 23 11:18:48 2006
|
> > Since elog 2.6.0 we cannot redirect our elog via apache2.
> >
> > in apache2.conf we have (had for a long time):
|