| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
68277
|
Tue Mar 8 14:12:26 2016 |
 | Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: Execute new|edit doesn't seem to work |
| Juergen Diefenbach wrote: |
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: | I'm just guessing, but you could try to disable the "save drafts" feature and see if the behaviour changes:
Save drafts = 0
If that is the case then Stefan will know where to look 
Cheers
Andreas |
Alright, I tried "Save drafts = 0" in the config file and now it seems to work all the time as expected!
Thank you, Andreas!
In principle I could live with this as I don't think I need to have drafts enabled.
Cheers,
Jürgen |
I would speculate that "Execute new" is not executed, when a draft is saved (as one would expect, since it's only a draft), but is neither executed when a draft is submitted (not as one would expect).
Good that you're fine for the moment.
If you could add a minimal configuration to reproduce the problem, then Stefan would have it easier to debug it. |
|
68276
|
Mon Mar 7 13:03:13 2016 |
| Juergen Diefenbach | diefenba@uni-mainz.de | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: Execute new|edit doesn't seem to work |
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: | I'm just guessing, but you could try to disable the "save drafts" feature and see if the behaviour changes:
Save drafts = 0
If that is the case then Stefan will know where to look
Cheers
Andreas |
Alright, I tried "Save drafts = 0" in the config file and now it seems to work all the time as expected!
Thank you, Andreas!
In principle I could live with this as I don't think I need to have drafts enabled.
Cheers,
Jürgen |
|
68275
|
Thu Mar 3 14:51:55 2016 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Re: Attribute Field Size Limited to 255 Characters |
No. At least there is no simple method.
You would need to edit the source code and recompile elogd. But the number 256 is used for about 300 times in the source code, you'll have a hard time finding the right one to increase.
Cheers, Andreas
| Mike Bodine wrote: |
|
I currently have an Attribute defined in my .cfg file as "Format <Attribute> = 0, attribname, attribvalue, 120, 500". I've found if I exceed 255 characters elogd.exe fails. Is there a method that will allow me to exceed 255 characters?
|
|
|
68274
|
Thu Mar 3 00:12:45 2016 |
 | Mike Bodine | Mike.Bodine@alcatel-lucent.com | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Attribute Field Size Limited to 255 Characters |
I currently have an Attribute defined in my .cfg file as "Format <Attribute> = 0, attribname, attribvalue, 120, 500". I've found if I exceed 255 characters elogd.exe fails. Is there a method that will allow me to exceed 255 characters? |
|
Draft
|
Thu Mar 3 00:02:26 2016 |
| Mike Bodine | Mike.Bodine@alcatel-lucent.com | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Attribute Field Size Limited to 255 Characters |
I currently have an Attribute defined in my .cfg file as "Format <Attribute> = 0, attribname, attribvalue, 120, 500". I've found if I exceed 255 characters elogd.exe fails. Is there a method that will allow me to exceed 255 characters? |
|
68272
|
Sun Feb 28 18:24:58 2016 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: Execute new|edit doesn't seem to work |
| Juergen Diefenbach wrote: | I am trying to use the "Execute new|edit|delete" feature to track changes to an elog using git.
[...]
However, I experienced unreproducible behavior when creating "new" entries. Sometimes the command specified by "Execute new=" is called, sometimes the one specified by "Execute edit=" is executed. Most of the time it doesn't work as expected. 
[...]
Do you have an idea how to fix this or can you point me in some direction to further track it down? Thank you! |
I'm just guessing, but you could try to disable the "save drafts" feature and see if the behaviour changes:
Save drafts = 0
If that is the case then Stefan will know where to look
Cheers
Andreas |
|
68271
|
Fri Feb 26 18:11:14 2016 |
| Devin Bougie | devin.bougie@cornell.edu | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: Links to images in notification message |
From the notification I received, it looks like "2" is a problem with this server. In the email notification, we would like images to be a link to a URL displaying the full-size image (as they are in v2.9.2).
Thanks,
Devin |
|
68270
|
Fri Feb 26 17:35:54 2016 |
 | Juergen Diefenbach | diefenba@uni-mainz.de | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.1 | Execute new|edit doesn't seem to work |
I am trying to use the "Execute new|edit|delete" feature to track changes to an elog using git.
When a new entry is created a shell script should be executed (certain attributes of the logbook entry should be passed as arguments to it). The script will then automatically stage all changes and create an appropriate git commit message. For a "new" entry in the logbook the commit message is a bit more verbose. When editing or deleting a message only a short commit message like "Edit message 25" should be created. Therefore I really need to distinguish between "new", "edit", and "delete".
However, I experienced unreproducible behavior when creating "new" entries. Sometimes the command specified by "Execute new=" is called, sometimes the one specified by "Execute edit=" is executed. Most of the time it doesn't work as expected.
What I did so far to understand what goes wrong is I looked into elogd.c and found invoid submit_elog(LOGBOOK * lbs) that bedit is sometimes true and sometimes false, when creating a new entry, although it should be false then (right?).
This is why elogd then sometimes retrieves the wrong shell command from getcfg(lbs->name, "Execute edit"...) instead of getcfg(lbs->name, "Execute new"...) around line 23610 (not exact due to some eprintf()s inserted here and there to look at bedit and so on).
When deleting an entry, everything works fine: the shell command defined via "Execute delete=" is run, but this happens somewhere else in the code so it's not a surprise.
Do you have an idea how to fix this or can you point me in some direction to further track it down? Thank you! |