Re: elog's image manipulation of .png file generated from a pdf/jpg, posted by Martin Rongen on Tue Jul 16 15:42:30 2013
|
> > Well I didn't crash the server this time, and I could invert the image in the demo logbook by doing two rotations.
> > But, this is elog v2.9.0-2435, and I am using v2.9.2-2475. And I remember there was a recent issue about the image manipulation at some point, so
I went to the
|
Re: elog's image manipulation of .png file generated from a pdf/jpg, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 16 16:35:01 2013
|
> I can confirm this bug in V2.9.2. Also after submitting the entry, the orginal image is being displayed, with no rotation, resizing etc...
Have you tried on the Demo logbook on the PSI server or on your installation. I just attached an image to this entry, rotated it twice, reduced its size |
Re: elog's image manipulation of .png file generated from a pdf/jpg, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Fri Jul 19 14:03:29 2013
|
> > I can confirm this bug in V2.9.2. Also after submitting the entry, the orginal image is being displayed, with no rotation, resizing etc...
>
Have you tried on the Demo logbook on the PSI server or on your installation. I just attached an image to this entry, rotated it twice, reduced its size
and it works fine. The point is that I have to reproduce your bug in order to fix it, but it seems I cannot.
> /Stefan
Hi |
Re: elog's image manipulation of .png file generated from a pdf/jpg, posted by Martin Rongen on Mon Jul 22 14:05:48 2013
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
I would suggest that the reporters of the issue add a little bit of information, like the version of the operating |
Re: elog utility for submission used wrong 'Host:' in POST header, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Jul 12 10:15:30 2005
|
> The 'elog' utility for commandline submission used wrong 'Host:' in POST header.
> The host listed after 'Host:' should be the host where the server runs, not the
> localhost (see patch below).
|
Re: elog utility for submission used wrong 'Host:' in POST header, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 20 21:03:29 2005
|
[quote="Emiliano Gabrielli"]This is not completally true IMHO .. better, it is, but it is not the only problem.
Elog seems to speak HTML/1.0, where "host:" is not implemented ... Since ELOG does [B]not[/B] support Vhosts I think the right beaviour is to [U]remove |
Re: elog submit without user and password, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 9 10:58:18 2002
|
> With elog it is possible to submit messages to a password protected
> logbook without specifying the -u option. I.e. NO PASSWORD is
> necessary to submit a message. I assume it is related to the problem
|
Re: elog submit without user and password, posted by H. Scheit on Tue Jul 9 15:28:33 2002
|
> > With elog it is possible to submit messages to a password protected
> > logbook without specifying the -u option. I.e. NO PASSWORD is
> > necessary to submit a message. I assume it is related to the problem
|