ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
1723
|
Thu Feb 23 15:50:20 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.1 | Re: Protect Selection page |
Hagelstein, Kay wrote: | I have a problem with the Option “Protect Selection page = 1” it doesn’t word in my Configuration. Is This a bug or a Problem with the Configuration? |
Thanks for reporting this. I could reproduce the prolem thanks to the config file you supplied. I fixed the problem and made a new release 2.6.1-3. |
1734
|
Wed Mar 1 07:48:11 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | Windows | 2.6.1-1668 | [SOLVED] Re: MOptions problem ? |
Alex H wrote: | It seems that the condition ID must be unique across the whole elogd.cfg. |
Right. Here is a quote from the Manual:
ELOG Manual wrote: | The only requiremnt is that conditions are unique, meaning that a condition in one option list cannot be used in another list. |
So just read the manual  |
1735
|
Wed Mar 1 07:55:42 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.1-1653 | Re: list view mode remembert - Bug? |
> As default http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK> shows the Summary View.
> Clicking in "Full" changes the URL to http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK>/?mode=full.
> But now the URL http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK> show the Full view as default.
> I think the URL without ?mode=... should show every time the same result,
> regardless the view used before. Or maybe I can configure, which view I want to
> see if I use the URL w/o ?mode=... The option to hide/show attachments is affected too.
Sure, that's a feature :D
It was requested by several people that the view mode is stored in a cookie. So if you switch modes, it should be
persistent. If I now add additional default flags, people will have hard time to understand what this is all
about, since there might then be conflicting settings between the flags and the cookies. So for what exact purpose
do you want what you requested? Why does it bother you that you have to click "Summary" again to get the summary
view? Of course you can delete the local cookies and get the default behaviour (they are named [b]elmode[/b] and
[b]elattach[/b]), but that might be a bit cumbersome. |
1736
|
Wed Mar 1 10:30:51 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Windows | V2.6.1-165 | Re: How to setup Change attributes in detail view/edit mode ? |
I implemented a "Hide attributes = ..." option, with which you can do what you requested, but unfortunately I'm
sitting here in Siberia and have only limited internet access, so I can only submit the modification next weekend.
- Stefan |
1737
|
Wed Mar 1 10:31:33 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.5.9 | Re: eLog Version number as eLog attribute? |
Steve Jones wrote: | When a footer is used (via Bottom text = <filename>) eLog no longer displays the eLog version number at the bottom. Is it possible to somehow expose the version/revision as an eLog attribute or have the version still display even when a replacement footer is specified?
Thanks! |
I added that feature, but will not be able to commit it before the next weekend. |
1741
|
Thu Mar 2 07:15:27 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.1-1622 | Re: Inline images URL not working |
Alexandre Gauthier wrote: | Whenever I try to insert an inline picture by using the elog:1741/1 paths with ELCode, the link becomes "logbookname2/1" (Where logbookname is the name of my logbook) and hence, doesn't work. I recall that it worked once. The image did not display, but the URL seemed correct... |
The problem has been fixed in version 2.6.1-3, so just upgrade.
Alexandre Gauthier wrote: | EDIT: i inserted a space in the elog URL above because regardless of the code brackets, it would still get interpreted. |
You have to put a "\" in front of everything which should not get converted into a link, so elog:1741/1 does not get interpreted. |
1749
|
Mon Mar 6 13:06:59 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | | 2.6.1 | Re: Find in multiple logbooks returns wrong pages |
This problem has been fixed in SVN revision 1671. |
1750
|
Mon Mar 6 13:40:40 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | 2.6.1 | Re: Allow $attributes in "Comment = " option |
Steve Jones wrote: | Is it possible to allow $attribute substitutions in the "Comment =" option for logbooks? |
The "Comment =" option for logbooks gives a general comment, like Discussion forum about ELOG for this forum. Since this comment is global, it does not make sense to have $attribute substitution. |