Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 232 of 796  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Versionup Subject
  1866   Tue Jul 4 07:04:19 2006 Reply Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionMac OSX2.6.1Re: Canīt run command "make" in OSX

Mats McLund wrote:
Hello.

I think to test Elog in Mac G5 with OSX 10.4.6.

In the manual is following installationtext:

"Installation from the tarball:
Download the latest elog-x.x.x.tar.gz package.
Expand the compressed TAR file with tar -xzvf elog-x.x.x.tar.gz. This creates a subdirectory elog-x.x.x where x.x.x is the version number. In that directory execute make, which creates the executables elogd, elog and elconv."

The problem is when i try to run the command "make" in ~/elog-2.6.1 subdirectory. I get following message:
-bash: make: command not found

Now, Im not an "UNIX-hacker" so I will be glad if anyone maybe can help me?



Best regardīs
Mats McLund



Quote:
Typically one would install the Gnu compiler series and with that come 'gmake'. Barring that, and not knowing anything about OSx, if OSx comes with its own compiler series then make might be somewhere on the system but not in your path. Go to http://gcc.gnu.org/ and see if you an find a pre-built version of gcc -- all I found mentioned "darwin". Perhaps Apple has something in the way of a development colleciton?
  1867   Tue Jul 4 08:46:15 2006 Reply Mats McLundmats.lund@nassjotryckeriet.seQuestionMac OSX2.6.1Re: Canīt run command "make" in OSX

Steve Jones wrote:

Mats McLund wrote:
Hello.

I think to test Elog in Mac G5 with OSX 10.4.6.

In the manual is following installationtext:

"Installation from the tarball:
Download the latest elog-x.x.x.tar.gz package.
Expand the compressed TAR file with tar -xzvf elog-x.x.x.tar.gz. This creates a subdirectory elog-x.x.x where x.x.x is the version number. In that directory execute make, which creates the executables elogd, elog and elconv."

The problem is when i try to run the command "make" in ~/elog-2.6.1 subdirectory. I get following message:
-bash: make: command not found

Now, Im not an "UNIX-hacker" so I will be glad if anyone maybe can help me?

Best regardīs
Mats McLund



Quote:
Typically one would install the Gnu compiler series and with that come 'gmake'. Barring that, and not knowing anything about OSx, if OSx comes with its own compiler series then make might be somewhere on the system but not in your path. Go to http://gcc.gnu.org/ and see if you an find a pre-built version of gcc -- all I found mentioned "darwin". Perhaps Apple has something in the way of a development colleciton?

Hi Steve.

I have now found a compiler on Apples Developer Tools --- they came as a CD from Apple with my Mac G5.

Great thanks to mr Thomas R. Vilberg for that tips!

I have now the "make"-commands to work as you see.

McLunds-G5:~/elog-2.6.1 admin$ ls -al
total 3984
drwxr-xr-x 21 1093 110 714 Jun 30 14:55 .
drwxrwxr-x 45 admin staff 1530 Jun 30 14:52 ..
-rwxr-xr-x 1 1093 110 17982 Oct 7 2005 COPYING
-rw-r--r-- 1 1093 110 3702 Mar 6 20:32 Makefile
-rw-r--r-- 1 1093 110 327 Oct 7 2005 README
drwxr-xr-x 11 1093 110 374 Apr 1 15:29 contrib
drwxr-xr-x 19 1093 110 646 Apr 1 15:29 doc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 110 35020 Jun 30 14:55 elconv
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 110 43152 Jun 30 14:53 elog
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 110 1806608 Jun 30 14:54 elogd
-rwxr-xr-x 1 1093 110 412 Mar 28 17:19 elogd.cfg
-rwxr-xr-x 1 1093 110 1256 Jan 19 09:19 elogd.init_template
drwxr-xr-x 3 1093 110 102 Apr 1 15:29 logbooks
drwxr-xr-x 5 1093 110 170 Apr 1 15:29 man
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 110 56868 Jun 30 14:53 mxml.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 110 46844 Jun 30 14:53 regex.o
drwxr-xr-x 31 1093 110 1054 Apr 1 15:29 resources
drwxr-xr-x 3 1093 110 102 Apr 1 15:29 scripts
drwxr-xr-x 8 1093 110 272 Apr 1 15:29 src
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 110 1672 Jun 30 14:53 strlcpy.o
drwxr-xr-x 3 1093 110 102 Apr 1 15:29 themes

But....

When I try to run "elogd -p 8080" or just "elogd" after installation I get message "-bash: elogd: command not found" Frown

You maybe have some other trick to start elogd?

Best regards and thanks for all help.

Mats McLund
  1868   Tue Jul 4 08:52:47 2006 Reply Gerald Ebberinkg.h.p.ebberink@nclr.nlQuestionMac OSX2.6.1Re: Canīt run command "make" in OSX

Mats McLund wrote:


But....

When I try to run "elogd -p 8080" or just "elogd" after installation I get message "-bash: elogd: command not found" Frown

You maybe have some other trick to start elogd?

Best regards and thanks for all help.

Mats McLund


Mats,

What you might want to try is the following (it works for linux which has bash)

in the elog directory run "./elogd -p 8080" you see the dot slash in there that means it should run the file in the local directory.

of that works you could try run "make install" in which case it will be installed in the directory where it can be found as a command.

these are just my 2 cents.
  1869   Tue Jul 4 13:07:53 2006 Reply Mats McLundmats.lund@nassjotryckeriet.seQuestionMac OSX2.6.1Re: Canīt run command "make" in OSX

Gerald Ebberink wrote:

Mats McLund wrote:


But....

When I try to run "elogd -p 8080" or just "elogd" after installation I get message "-bash: elogd: command not found" Frown

You maybe have some other trick to start elogd?

Best regards and thanks for all help.

Mats McLund


Mats,

What you might want to try is the following (it works for linux which has bash)

in the elog directory run "./elogd -p 8080" you see the dot slash in there that means it should run the file in the local directory.

of that works you could try run "make install" in which case it will be installed in the directory where it can be found as a command.

these are just my 2 cents.


Hello Gerald.

Tank you for your help!

But..... Frown

When I run ./elogd -p 8080 I get "Bus error" message.

Best regards

Mats McLund
  1872   Mon Jul 10 11:14:12 2006 Reply Gerald Ebberinkg.h.p.ebberink@nclr.nlQuestionMac OSX2.6.1Re: Canīt run command "make" in OSX

Mats McLund wrote:


Hello Gerald.

Tank you for your help!

But..... Frown

When I run ./elogd -p 8080 I get "Bus error" message.

Best regards

Mats McLund


Hello Mats,

This sounds like something I have not encountered, so I think you'll need to wait for Mr. Ritt to solve this.
  1873   Mon Jul 10 11:15:25 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionMac OSX2.6.1Re: Canīt run command "make" in OSX

Gerald Ebberink wrote:
This sounds like something I have not encountered, so I think you'll need to wait for Mr. Ritt to solve this.


No, I can't solve this becaue I have no MAC.

Sorry,

Stefan
  1881   Mon Jul 17 13:20:07 2006 Reply Gerald Ebberinkg.h.p.ebberink@nclr.nlQuestionLinux2.6.1Re: restrict access

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Gerald Ebberink wrote:
As you can see, I have implemented a temporary fix in the way of allowing only certain hosts access. But where does this Internal error come from.


I only can identify this error if you send me your current ("de-sensified") elogd.cfg.


I have just installed the svn version of elog, and the problem has been fixed.

Thank you very much!
  1917   Tue Aug 29 15:16:31 2006 Reply Giorgio Croci Candianig.crocic@libero.itBug reportLinux | Windows2.6.1Re: Access to global configuration in v2.6.1
Hi,
after a long time, I thought I could try to investigate the code some further,
and maybe I found some hint.
The page where I expected the options to show was (probably) the one generated by this function:

void show_admin_page(LOGBOOK * lbs, char *top_group)

Inside, it, the buttons are generated by following code snippets:

(elogd.c:10443)
if (is_admin_user_global(getparam("unm"))) {
   sprintf(str, loc("Change %s"), "[global]");
   rsprintf("<input type=submit name=cmd value=\"%s\">\n", str);
}
(elogd.c:10461)
  if (is_admin_user("global", getparam("unm"))) {
     rsprintf("<input type=submit name=cmd value=\"%s\">\n", loc("Delete this logbook"));
     rsprintf("<input type=submit name=cmd value=\"%s\">\n", loc("Rename this logbook"));
     rsprintf("<input type=submit name=cmd value=\"%s\">\n", loc("Create new logbook"));
}

The functions called to validate the user are following:

(elogd.c:21298)
BOOL is_admin_user(char *logbook, char *user):
//...
   if (user == NULL)
      return FALSE;

(elogd.c:21324)

BOOL is_admin_user_global(char *user)
{
//...
   if (user == NULL)
      return FALSE;

Since I assume that I'm probably in the "userless" case (no users are defined in the configuration,
and no usernames are set when launching elog either), I would understand that this causes the options for
global config editing etc etc not to be shown on the admin page.

In my opinion (and given that my interpretation of the code flow isn't wrong), the "null"
user should be indeed considered admin, at least as long as no user management is defined whatsoever.
(If I got it right, if user==NULL, but a password file exists, user management is applied,
thus we're in the case of anonymous user which is correctly not admin).

Again, I might be wrong, but I would be curious to hear an opinion from you about this issue.
Thanks again for your attention.
GiorgioCC
ELOG V3.1.5-2eba886