Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 24 of 238  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
icon5.gif   Different Top Groups or Groups have the same logbook name , posted by MATT TERRON on Tue Feb 2 04:01:21 2021 

I have built different top groups for different departments. But occasionally these different top groups have the same logbook name, say 'Maintenance Log'. So is there a way I can have the same logbook name under different 'Top Groups', rather than rename these logbooks as 'Department1 Maintenance Log' all the way to 'Department_X Maintenance Log'?

    icon2.gif   Re: Different Top Groups or Groups have the same logbook name , posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 2 07:43:49 2021 

Unfortunately you have to name these top groups differently, because they are internally used for the database name.

MATT TERRON wrote:

I have built different top groups for different departments. But occasionally these different top groups have the same logbook name, say 'Maintenance Log'. So is there a way I can have the same logbook name under different 'Top Groups', rather than rename these logbooks as 'Department1 Maintenance Log' all the way to 'Department_X Maintenance Log'?

 

       icon2.gif   Re: Different Top Groups or Groups have the same logbook name , posted by MATT TERRON on Tue Feb 2 08:17:15 2021 

So both Top Group names and Logbook names should be unique inside one .cfg file, is that correct?

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Unfortunately you have to name these top groups differently, because they are internally used for the database name.

MATT TERRON wrote:

I have built different top groups for different departments. But occasionally these different top groups have the same logbook name, say 'Maintenance Log'. So is there a way I can have the same logbook name under different 'Top Groups', rather than rename these logbooks as 'Department1 Maintenance Log' all the way to 'Department_X Maintenance Log'?

 

 

       icon2.gif   Re: Different Top Groups or Groups have the same logbook name , posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 2 08:25:46 2021 

That's correct.

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Unfortunately you have to name these top groups differently, because they are internally used for the database name.

MATT TERRON wrote:

I have built different top groups for different departments. But occasionally these different top groups have the same logbook name, say 'Maintenance Log'. So is there a way I can have the same logbook name under different 'Top Groups', rather than rename these logbooks as 'Department1 Maintenance Log' all the way to 'Department_X Maintenance Log'?

 

 

icon5.gif   elog slowness, posted by Giuseppe Cucinotta on Thu Jan 14 11:43:00 2021 

We run elog on a server to provide a logbook for our laboratory. We noticed that elog is very slow on loading pages: browser pages spend a lot of time in charging (actually one can speed the procedure refreshing the page but it is quite annoying).

I checked the server load with top and it doesn't show any abnormal CPU or memory usage. Then I ran lsof and I noticed that there are more than 200 entries related to the same elog PID and labelled with CLOSE_WAIT.

My questions are: can the slowness of my logbook be due to the presence of all these CLOSE_WAIT entries (which seems if I understood well wait for a response)? If it's the case, how can I solve this issue?

Thanks

    icon2.gif   Re: elog slowness, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 14 14:05:19 2021 

Have you tried to restart the elogd server? The CLOSE_WAIT could be dangling network connections, which were not properly closed by the browser.

Giuseppe Cucinotta wrote:

We run elog on a server to provide a logbook for our laboratory. We noticed that elog is very slow on loading pages: browser pages spend a lot of time in charging (actually one can speed the procedure refreshing the page but it is quite annoying).

I checked the server load with top and it doesn't show any abnormal CPU or memory usage. Then I ran lsof and I noticed that there are more than 200 entries related to the same elog PID and labelled with CLOSE_WAIT.

My questions are: can the slowness of my logbook be due to the presence of all these CLOSE_WAIT entries (which seems if I understood well wait for a response)? If it's the case, how can I solve this issue?

Thanks

 

icon5.gif   hidden files, posted by Lahreche Abdelmadjid on Sun Jan 10 11:13:31 2021 

Hello;

Could I make change on program only on the " elogd.cfg" ?

Or is there onother files, because I think there is hidden files ?

icon5.gif   outdated debian package, posted by Chris Körner on Fri Dec 18 18:08:54 2020 

Hi everyone,

I am currently trying to setup elog as a docker container. I wonder if there is any reason why the elog debian package is stuck at version 3.1.3? Would it be possible to update it to the latest version? 

 

Thanks very much!

icon5.gif   How to increase TEXT_SIZE to address entry text limit, posted by Illam Pakkirisamy on Thu Dec 3 19:11:38 2020 

Hi,

I'm trying to increase the entry text constraint but not sure how to do this.  Couldn't find it in the documentation or may be I missed it.  Appreciate your help.

Thanks.
Illam

 

    icon2.gif   Re: How to increase TEXT_SIZE to address entry text limit, posted by Simon Däster on Wed Dec 16 12:41:42 2020 

Hi Illam

You actually have to change the source code of elog and then recompile. Download the code from https://bitbucket.org/ritt/elog/src/master/, change the value of the variable TEXT_SIZE in the file src/elogd.h

Default ist #define TEXT_SIZE 250000

 

Illam Pakkirisamy wrote:

Hi,

I'm trying to increase the entry text constraint but not sure how to do this.  Couldn't find it in the documentation or may be I missed it.  Appreciate your help.

Thanks.
Illam

 

 

icon5.gif   Is there a way to upload a file in custom input?, posted by Satyajit Jena on Tue Dec 15 14:50:55 2020 

Hi,

I am trying to implement a Custom input forms by following this  https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Contributions/49. Is there a way to also insert an image or files to it? I want to take a snap from the iPad and want that to go as an attachment or attach a file(s) into the form. Is there a way to do that?

Your suggestions are highly appreciated.

Regards,

sjena

 

    icon2.gif   Re: Is there a way to upload a file in custom input?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Dec 15 15:19:25 2020 

When you submit a "normal" elog entry, you can click on "Choose file" to add an attachment. On a mobile device, you will then be asked to select a photo from your library or take one with your camera. You can do the same on a custom form. You have to extract the code from the normal submissoin form and program it on your custom page. It needs however some work and might not be straight forward.

Stefan

Satyajit Jena wrote:

Hi,

I am trying to implement a Custom input forms by following this  https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Contributions/49. Is there a way to also insert an image or files to it? I want to take a snap from the iPad and want that to go as an attachment or attach a file(s) into the form. Is there a way to do that?

Your suggestions are highly appreciated.

Regards,

sjena

 

 

       icon2.gif   Re: Is there a way to upload a file in custom input?, posted by Satyajit Jena on Tue Dec 15 17:41:57 2020 

Thanks Stefan,

I am not yet able to figure out how attachment submission is done, I am trying. It would be helpful if you can refer me to some pointer.

With regards,

satyajit

Stefan Ritt wrote:

When you submit a "normal" elog entry, you can click on "Choose file" to add an attachment. On a mobile device, you will then be asked to select a photo from your library or take one with your camera. You can do the same on a custom form. You have to extract the code from the normal submissoin form and program it on your custom page. It needs however some work and might not be straight forward.

Stefan

Satyajit Jena wrote:

Hi,

I am trying to implement a Custom input forms by following this  https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Contributions/49. Is there a way to also insert an image or files to it? I want to take a snap from the iPad and want that to go as an attachment or attach a file(s) into the form. Is there a way to do that?

Your suggestions are highly appreciated.

Regards,

sjena

 

 

 

icon5.gif   length of condition names, posted by Harry Martin on Wed Dec 2 22:45:16 2020 

The documentation describing the use of conditionals uses a single character (letter or number) for names of conditions.  I don't see any update/change to that rule anywhere in the docs.

I have been using multi-character condition names successfully.   I find these are easier to use since they can be more descriptive of each condition.   It works, but I am concerned I may be doing something that might not be supported going forward.   (It is simple enough to change these, but I'd prefer to know if this practice is acceptable.)

Thank you, again, for this fine (and, may I add, fun?) tool.  I'm having a good time with it!

    icon2.gif   Re: length of condition names, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Dec 3 09:57:20 2020 

You can easily use multi-character conditionals, up to 256 chars.

Harry Martin wrote:

The documentation describing the use of conditionals uses a single character (letter or number) for names of conditions.  I don't see any update/change to that rule anywhere in the docs.

I have been using multi-character condition names successfully.   I find these are easier to use since they can be more descriptive of each condition.   It works, but I am concerned I may be doing something that might not be supported going forward.   (It is simple enough to change these, but I'd prefer to know if this practice is acceptable.)

Thank you, again, for this fine (and, may I add, fun?) tool.  I'm having a good time with it!

 

       icon2.gif   Re: length of condition names, posted by Harry Martin on Fri Dec 4 02:03:56 2020 

Could we update the doc for this?

Stefan Ritt wrote:

You can easily use multi-character conditionals, up to 256 chars.

Harry Martin wrote:

The documentation describing the use of conditionals uses a single character (letter or number) for names of conditions.  I don't see any update/change to that rule anywhere in the docs.

I have been using multi-character condition names successfully.   I find these are easier to use since they can be more descriptive of each condition.   It works, but I am concerned I may be doing something that might not be supported going forward.   (It is simple enough to change these, but I'd prefer to know if this practice is acceptable.)

Thank you, again, for this fine (and, may I add, fun?) tool.  I'm having a good time with it!

 

 

icon5.gif   Options <...> vs ROptions <...>, posted by Wolfgang Bayer on Thu Apr 28 11:20:40 2011 

According to section "Syntax of elogd.cfg" of the "Administrator's Guide" Options <attribute> = <list> and  ROptions <attribute> = <list> should be the same. But there is a litle difference, because choosing an entry of the Options-pull-down menu causes a reload of the entry mask while choosing a ROption-radio-button the entry mask is not reloaded. This causes a problem using conditional attributes. The condition is only paid attention to in case of Options but not in case of ROptions. In my case I would like to use ROption, as it is faster to set a radio button than to choose an item in a pull-down menu, but I can't as I have also to use conditional attributes. Is there any solution?

    icon2.gif   Re: Options <...> vs ROptions <...>, posted by Harry Martin on Thu Dec 3 01:51:49 2020 

Same problem here, in version 3.1.3.   It would be very nice if this worked.

Wolfgang Bayer wrote:

According to section "Syntax of elogd.cfg" of the "Administrator's Guide" Options <attribute> = <list> and  ROptions <attribute> = <list> should be the same. But there is a litle difference, because choosing an entry of the Options-pull-down menu causes a reload of the entry mask while choosing a ROption-radio-button the entry mask is not reloaded. This causes a problem using conditional attributes. The condition is only paid attention to in case of Options but not in case of ROptions. In my case I would like to use ROption, as it is faster to set a radio button than to choose an item in a pull-down menu, but I can't as I have also to use conditional attributes. Is there any solution?

 

       icon2.gif   Re: Options <...> vs ROptions <...>, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Dec 3 09:58:44 2020 

For conditional attributes, you have to use Options, not ROptions. Maybe I will implement that one day, but only if I will have plenty of time...

Harry Martin wrote:

Same problem here, in version 3.1.3.   It would be very nice if this worked.

Wolfgang Bayer wrote:

According to section "Syntax of elogd.cfg" of the "Administrator's Guide" Options <attribute> = <list> and  ROptions <attribute> = <list> should be the same. But there is a litle difference, because choosing an entry of the Options-pull-down menu causes a reload of the entry mask while choosing a ROption-radio-button the entry mask is not reloaded. This causes a problem using conditional attributes. The condition is only paid attention to in case of Options but not in case of ROptions. In my case I would like to use ROption, as it is faster to set a radio button than to choose an item in a pull-down menu, but I can't as I have also to use conditional attributes. Is there any solution?

 

 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6