Demo
Discussion
Forum
Config Examples
Contributions
Vulnerabilities
Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 260 of 808
Not logged in
Find
|
Login
|
Help
Full
|
Summary
| Threaded |
Collapse
|
Expand
-- All entries --
Last day
Last 3 Days
Last week
Last month
Last 3 Months
Last 6 Months
Last Year
-- Category --
Info
Bug report
Bug fix
Question
Request
Comment
Other
6459 Entries
Goto page
Previous
1
,
2
,
3
...
259
, 260,
261
...
806
,
807
,
808
Next
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 21:08:56 2005
> > > I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3.
> > > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> > > strlcpy.h. Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 21:14:53 2005
> > > > I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3.
> > > > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> > > > strlcpy.h. Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 21:17:29 2005
> Ok, now I see the issue - the tar extract created the mxml directory in the root (not
> under the created directory elog-2.5.9). Is there a reason why these includes are not
> placed in the src dir like the regex.h/.c include?
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 21:22:46 2005
[ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
elog-2.5.9/
elog-2.5.9/doc/
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 23:30:11 2005
> [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
> elog-2.5.9/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/
Re: Version 3.1.1 of elog has been released, posted by Edmund Hertle on Thu Aug 20 14:23:43 2015
There seems to be a small problem with the new "Date/Time format <attribute>" implementation. It works great for the detailed view of
a single entry:
Re: Version 3.1.1 of elog has been released, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Aug 20 15:52:26 2015
Thanks for reportung that bug. I fixed it in revision f828049.
Edmund
Hertle wrote:
There seems to be a small problem with the new "Date/Time format
Re: Version 2.3.9 released today, posted by nickc1 on Wed Jul 16 21:42:54 2003
Can you give a syntax example of the Logging Level option ?
Goto page
Previous
1
,
2
,
3
...
259
, 260,
261
...
806
,
807
,
808
Next
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6