ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67006
|
Fri Feb 4 00:11:09 2011 |
| T. Ribbrock | emgaron+elog@ribbrock.org | Question | Other | 2.8.1 | Strange problem with dates - need debugging help | I have just installed elog 2.8.1 on my OpenBSD 4.8 server (I've added the necessary Makefile patch to "Contributions"). Everything seems to work fine, however, I ran into a very odd problems with the dates of the logbook entries: When I start a new entry, the current date/time is displayed correctly. When I submit the entry and look at it again, the date has changed to some value in 1996 . I've checked the actual logbook file and there, the entry has a Date line like this:
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:53:28 -13049141
The "-13049141" looks very suspicious to me - but I have no idea whatsoever why this happens. I had elogd running with -v, but that did not give me any hints. Any ideas how to debug/resolve this would be much appreciated...
|
67005
|
Wed Feb 2 15:26:53 2011 |
| Robert Heine | heine@kph.uni-mainz.de | Question | All | 2350 | Fckedit and quotation style sheets | Dear colleagues,
I have edited my own style sheets for elog, but if I use the reply function while having fckedit as editor, the quotations have the standard elog colors, not mine. With elog's own editor, I get my colors. I figured out that fckedit inserts the quote as HTML-block with "hard coded" colors, but I am not able to find the template fckedit uses for it! Does anyone know the path to this template?
Thank you in advance
Robert Heine |
67004
|
Wed Feb 2 14:04:19 2011 |
| Robert Heine | heine@kph.uni-mainz.de | Question | Windows | V2.8.0-231 | Re: Error Message in "Demo of database-like elog" |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Robert Heine wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
mike cianci wrote: |
I attempted to remove the text editor (like you did in "Demo of database-like elog") using "Show text = 0".
In both your Demo and my logbook when you hit "New" - Explorer generates the folowing error message
Error: The Textarea with id or name set to "text" was not found.
Is there a solution or do we just live with it.
Thanks, Mike
|
Thanks for reporting that bug. I fixed it in SVN revision 2188, and the fix will be contained in the next release.
|
I am getting the same message in the current version (V2.8.0-2312), if the "Preset text" text body contains the equal sign '='. Then this message pops up and the HTML-editor dosn't show its menu bars, with the elog- or plain text editor this does not happen. It happens as well with firefox as with internet explorer.
best regards
Robert
|
I found a bug there, but am not 100% sure if it fixed your problem. Can you please try the current SVN version 2331? I made a new intermediate release elog280-4.exe for you.
|
Sorry, I was busy for a while. I've just upgraded to SVN 2350 and the problem seems to be gone.
Best wishes
Robert |
67003
|
Wed Jan 26 19:38:58 2011 |
| Louis de Leseleuc | louis.deleseleuc@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca | Request | Linux | 2.8.1 | Re: Working Ubuntu 10.10 ELOG binaries |
Louis de Leseleuc wrote: |
Hello,
Can anyone please send me, or publicly provide, working Ubuntu 10.10 binaries (64-bit) for ELOG?
I have compiled and installed the program. While the core functionalities are OK, I have run into irritating bugs in filtering and config editing that are not present in the online demo (but are in my local demo and logbook).
Hence I suspect compilation to be the cause.
For the curious:
- Saving the config within ELOG scrambles the elog.conf file
Theme = default
Comment = Louis's Lab Book
Attributes = Project, Type, Category, Subject
after saving becomes
Them = defaultt
Commnt = Louiss's Lab Book
Attribute = Prroject, Type, Category, Subject
- In the Find page, drop-down filters for attributes are ignored, but text is searched
- In the threaded view, Quick filters "dissociate" posts and replies, so that all rows are now in reverse chronological order
Cheers!
Louis
|
Hmm actually that last bug is also present in the demo. Any hope of fixing that?
True, some posts may not match the filters, leaving replies "orphan". I suggest that any orphan reply be either attached to the nearest upper level, or if not possible, be styled as a post instead of a reply (no arrow or indent) so as not to mistake it for a reply to the message above.
The benefit would be to be able to follow threads matching certain categories. |
67002
|
Wed Jan 26 19:35:48 2011 |
| Louis de Leseleuc | louis.deleseleuc@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca | Request | Linux | 2.8.1 | Working Ubuntu 10.10 ELOG binaries | Hello,
Can anyone please send me, or publicly provide, working Ubuntu 10.10 binaries (64-bit) for ELOG?
I have compiled and installed the program. While the core functionalities are OK, I have run into irritating bugs in filtering and config editing that are not present in the online demo (but are in my local demo and logbook).
Hence I suspect compilation to be the cause.
For the curious:
- Saving the config within ELOG scrambles the elog.conf file
Theme = default
Comment = Louis's Lab Book
Attributes = Project, Type, Category, Subject
after saving becomes
Them = defaultt
Commnt = Louiss's Lab Book
Attribute = Prroject, Type, Category, Subject
- In the Find page, drop-down filters for attributes are ignored, but text is searched
- In the threaded view, Quick filters "dissociate" posts and replies, so that all rows are now in reverse chronological order
Cheers!
Louis
|
67001
|
Wed Jan 26 11:33:51 2011 |
| Behdad D | behdad@inbox.com | Question | Windows | latest | Edit Mode - Icons | Hi all,
Is there a way to add more icons to the currently available icons when you are in the edit mode. For example instead of having this icon if I want to add a different icon that is not in the list.
The reason I ask is that I want for example to have an icon of a bug(for software bugs) or something different.
I looked in the elog's installation directory and I could find all of the available icons but couldn't see any place where I could modify the installation to allow me access to the extra icons.
Thanks in advance.
Behdad. |
67000
|
Fri Jan 21 11:28:02 2011 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Request | Linux | 2.8.1-2353 | Re: Wishlist: Roption | > > I'd like this same facility with elog. Now I know that it can be
> > done by (for example) in the config file preselecting one of the
> > selections on reply- or indeed one that does not exist to "clear" it,
> > but in this case that is not the route I'd want to take every time.
>
> What about defining an additional option "unspecified". So you have
>
> Roptions attr = option1, option2, option3, none
>
> Whenever you click on "none", the selection is removed from the other options. The HTML standard unfortunately does
> not foresee radio buttons not being selected, so I would have to tweak it somehow to get exactly what you want.
Hadn't realised the standard was written that way.
What you propose seems fine to me.
David. |
66999
|
Fri Jan 21 08:49:31 2011 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Linux | 2.8.1-2353 | Re: Wishlist: Roption | > I'd like this same facility with elog. Now I know that it can be
> done by (for example) in the config file preselecting one of the
> selections on reply- or indeed one that does not exist to "clear" it,
> but in this case that is not the route I'd want to take every time.
What about defining an additional option "unspecified". So you have
Roptions attr = option1, option2, option3, none
Whenever you click on "none", the selection is removed from the other options. The HTML standard unfortunately does
not foresee radio buttons not being selected, so I would have to tweak it somehow to get exactly what you want. |
|