Dear John,

I am a user of the elog system and no developer, so no complete answer guaranteed.

The quote of the manual describes the case, if e.g. an hardware component discovers a failure and the connected PC makes an automatic (new) entry to the elog. Probably modifying an existing one.

I have small concerns on your solution. The description of your alarm system sounds the other ways around, as you are doing something, depending on the elog entries. Based on your statement on JS and dedicated start page, you want to do it on client-side and not on the server. Where I can see the issue, if there is not client, then there is no alarm. As you want to change the date of the entries, I believe, you want to reuse the same entries multiple (infinite?) times instead of creating new ones. The later would be the style of an logging software like elog.

As far as I know, the Date attribute is special and cannot be changed by submitting something to the elog server. as this would make "Restrict edit time" useless. You can try it with this in your config:
Subst on edit Date = $date
Making an entry and edit it afterwards. The entry time stays the same.
If you really want to use this attribute, you have to do some scripting to the actual saved .log files, but this is not intended as I believe.

What you can do, is using an alternative attribute like "MDate" with the config:
Subst MDate = $date
Subst on edit MDate = $date
This will update every time you edit the entry.
Then you probably want to add something like this to your config
List display = ID, MDate, Author, ...

Or "Update" using the duplicate function on the old entry, where you want to change the date, creating a new one with the same content.
Or "Update" using the reply function to create a new entry, referring to the old one.

I hope, I could help.
Best wishes,
Sebastian

As far as I know, it is not possible, if you make a "new" entry.
You could configure the elog, to always PRESET an atribute, but then it is always the same, not the last.

I think the "duplicate" entry function could provide you partly with the functionality you want, as it copies all old values into a new entry.

Regards,
Sebastian

Hello all,

I have the issue, that we can't list entries older than 1 year, if "Last default = 31" (or any other number, but they are restricted to 1, 3, 7, 31, 92, 182, 364) is active.
The quick filter displays the option for "-- all entries --" but selecting this only reloads the default time frame (31 days).

A workaroud is to select a different time e.g. 1 day and then modifying the URL to ?last=1000 or so, gives acces to the old entries.
But this is not the intended way to do it.

The Find results are also affected by this. e.g. selecting 1.1.2020 to 1.6.2020 with "Last default = 31" yields 0 results.
The "Show last default" atrtribute for 1, 3, 7, 31, 92, 182, 364 work fine and overwrite the "last default" time in the quick filter.

In the Find page, there will be a "All entries" option at the top of the date selection box, if "Show last default" equals to 1, 3, 7, 31, 92, 182 or 364
(2, Bug: it is empty for "Show last default = 0" and not All entries")

Selecting "All entries" or the empty first value in the Find "show last:" date , will give a Find result with the "Last default" time constraint.

Thus it is not possible to get any entry older then the longst period possible (364 days), if you don't know about the workaround.

Best wishes,
Sebastian

PS: I use a self-compiled version of elog up to the 395e101 commit in the bitbucket repository with pull request #7 (which hasn't been merged for over 1,5 years) and a simple patch for our local LDAP.

One other way would be to do the conversion on the client-side using javascript.
Overwrite the complete datetime input cell and add an event listener to either onChange of this input or the submit event, to trigger the conversion before submitting, so elog would get the converted time.

In out elog some entries get additional information added in this way.

Dear Stefano,

the support for the LDAP is limited. As stated in the documentation "on an as-is basis".
We use the AD of our university, but I had to re-write a part of the elog auth.c to match the LDAP-tags, so this could also be a issue.

As for your question.
If some of the logins a working fine, then the other ones could have issues with the DN string, maybe...

Your 2 lines of the logfile output show 2 (attempt) directly after each other.
There should be some lines regarding LDAP in between.
I get the (attempt) and directly (success) case only for FILE authentication.

If you have left out these lines on purpose, ignore the following suggestion.
Is it possible that you have previously used FILE authentication for the users, who could login via LDAP successfully?
If yes, delete a user in passwd.file, which could successfully login via LDAP and let them login again.
This should prove, that there is no artifact from previous FILE authentication.

An other idea may be, check if the users have non-standard characters in their name, mail or password.
e.g. I had problems with german umlauts and your mail ends in it, so there could be some other special charaters.

I hope, I could help.
Best wishes,
Sebastian


> Dear experts,
>    I have a logbook which has authentication as follow
> 
> Authentication = LDAP, File
> Password file = PASSWD.file
> LDAP server = ldaps://it-ldap-XXX.XXX.XX:1636
> LDAP userbase = ou=people,ou=RGY,o=XXX,c=XX
> LDAP login attribute = uid
> LDAP register = 0
> Self register = 0
> Allow password change = 0
> 
> Some of the my user (but not all) have issue in accessing this protected elogbook.
> The ldap password is correct (we checked).
> What I see in the log is as follow:
> 
> 22-Feb-2021 11:25:51 [XXX.YYY.ZZZ.QQ] {Beam Run} LOGIN user "USERNAME" (attempt)
> 22-Feb-2021 11:25:59 [XXX.YYY.ZZZ.QQ] {Beam Run} LOGIN user "USERNAME" (attempt)
> 
> The user USERNAME is present in PASSWD.file.
> 
> For other user, for which the login works, I do see an (attempt) and then (success)
> 
> we tried the standard stuff: clear cache/cookies and with different browser. We also tried to remove the user from PASSWD.file and 
> create it again, but nothing has worked.
> 
> Any suggestion how I can debug this problem?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
>   Stefano

Hi,

we use the LDAPS connection in our setup and it works without issues.
You have to specify "LDAP server = ldaps://server.tld:port" and normally it uses a different port (636) than insecure LDAP (389).

Best wishes,
Sebastian

I am not Stefan, but maybe I can add to this issue.

Personally I think it is not a good way to dump all the information into the text field and try to let the server parse it.
This could be archived more simply by using e.g. the python elog scripts or using the elog command tool to directly submit well structured elog entires.

As you have mentioned you could use the "execute new|edit|delete" commands to do the things you want to do.
Let the called script fetch the elog entry and alter it in the way you like and resubmit the entry.
(You have to make sure to don't generate a endless loop and you have to proably have to use a forwarding script as the elog "execute" command waits for finished execution).
This way you don't touch the 1500 characters limit of passing $text to the execute command.

Also the point "filling an attribute X with free text" needs some kind of (extended) parsing, which isn't possible with the subst command.
In our elog we such an attribute X, which is in some conditions filled with a set of other attributes and on other conditions just a normal input field, so the user could type custom text in.

"fill an attribute automatically with the character length of the text" could be done with the above mentioned execute command or it could be done on the clientside (e.g. browser using javascript or if automatically generated by a script, then directly by the script)

I hope it helps to build our application.
Best wishes,
Sebastian

Sorry Stefan, but it is possible as you have the scripting ability.

The idea is to use "Preset Test_Attribute = $shell(script_to_get_the_last_entry)", where the script asks elog about the details and parses them.
The problem here is, that the elogd already is working to resolve the click on "new entry" request (or similar) and the script can't call elogd until the page is delievered, what is to late.
(If it would, the elogd will hang.)

So the script either has to directly parse all the entry.log files in the logbook folder or you need a second elogd running, which can answer the request from the script.
This second elogd could run on a different port and it doen't need to be public as it only answers internal requests and could use the same config as the "primary" elogd.
My idea for the script uses the python elog module to establish the connection and do the parsing.

I hope this helps as a workaround.
Best wishes,
Sebastian