Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 371 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
    icon2.gif   Re: Image attachments null in e-mails. Error log?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Nov 6 17:06:40 2013 

Daniel Campora wrote:

 Hi there :)

I'm having a problem with the e-mail notification on my installation of elog. I'm testing the attachment upload with images, and it seems to work seamlessly. However upon posting, the e-mail notification sends a null attachment, instead of the image I would expect.

Is there an error log I can check for this? I started the elog process without the daemon option, but I can't see any error coming up.

Cheers,
 

This problem has been fixed in the current version. Please get it from bitbucket.org. 

    icon2.gif   Re: Compilation failure on Mac OSX 10.9, posted by A.G. Schubert on Thu Nov 7 02:18:17 2013 

Stefan Ritt wrote:

A.G. Schubert wrote:

When compiling elog on OSX 10.9 (Mavericks), I get the error below.

Elog will compile without error if I add -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 to CFLAGS in Makefile, but I'm not sure whether this is a good idea.

All over sudden gcc comes with its own version of "strlcpy", which I had defined "manually" since many years inside ELOG. Using -DFORTIFY_SOURCE=0 will not harm, so you can use it. The "real" solution is to take our ELOG's strlcpy/strlcat, which I did on the current SVN version.

Best regards,
Stefan 

Ok, I tried updating my SVN working copy, but I didn't get any updates past elog rev. 2494, mxml rev. 74.  I undid my changes to Makefile, tried to compile, but got the same errors.  

I then pulled down elog and mxml with git, and these are working for me with no errors.  Thanks!

    icon2.gif   Re: Compilation failure on Mac OSX 10.9, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Nov 7 08:08:12 2013 

A.G. Schubert wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

A.G. Schubert wrote:

When compiling elog on OSX 10.9 (Mavericks), I get the error below.

Elog will compile without error if I add -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 to CFLAGS in Makefile, but I'm not sure whether this is a good idea.

All over sudden gcc comes with its own version of "strlcpy", which I had defined "manually" since many years inside ELOG. Using -DFORTIFY_SOURCE=0 will not harm, so you can use it. The "real" solution is to take our ELOG's strlcpy/strlcat, which I did on the current SVN version.

Best regards,
Stefan 

Ok, I tried updating my SVN working copy, but I didn't get any updates past elog rev. 2494, mxml rev. 74.  I undid my changes to Makefile, tried to compile, but got the same errors.  

I then pulled down elog and mxml with git, and these are working for me with no errors.  Thanks!

SVN is obsolete and will NOT be maintained any more, since we completely switched to GIT. Actually I will disable the service soon. 

    icon2.gif   Re: date and time, posted by Hal Proctor on Wed Nov 13 14:27:34 2013 

> [13 Nov] > As my threads have lots of replies, I end up with a forest of ">" characters which makes it difficult to read > earlier quoted entries (what with word-wrapping of the browser). > I thought to replace the ">"s by a simple date entry prepended to the start of each reply. - much as I have > given at the top of this initial entry. > > So this is what I put in the config file: > > .... > Time format = %a %d %b %y > Date format = %d %b > Prepend on reply = [$date] \n > ... > > The time is used in the string for the Thread display. > > Only I don't get the date, with the date format, prepended to replies but the time, in the time format, as > > [Wed 13 Nov 13] > > Now this is hardly a disaster, but any ideas why the date formatting is being ignored?

 

https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/67405

Why all the > Characters?  Maybe back off the version as stated in above link?  Not sure about the date issue.

    icon2.gif   Re: date and time, posted by David Pilgram on Wed Nov 13 14:41:07 2013 

Hal Proctor wrote:

> [13 Nov] > As my threads have lots of replies, I end up with a forest of ">" characters which makes it difficult to read > earlier quoted entries (what with word-wrapping of the browser). > I thought to replace the ">"s by a simple date entry prepended to the start of each reply. - much as I have > given at the top of this initial entry. > > So this is what I put in the config file: > > .... > Time format = %a %d %b %y > Date format = %d %b > Prepend on reply = [$date] \n > ... > > The time is used in the string for the Thread display. > > Only I don't get the date, with the date format, prepended to replies but the time, in the time format, as > > [Wed 13 Nov 13] > > Now this is hardly a disaster, but any ideas why the date formatting is being ignored?

 

https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/67405

Why all the > Characters?  Maybe back off the version as stated in above link?  Not sure about the date issue.

 I don't know what happened here - I mean, I understand the ">" characters being added to the start of every line of a quoted previous entry, but now what then happened to the formatting.

By default in plain mode elog adds ">" to the start of every quoted line, just as quoting an email will do (some mailer programs).

If you're beyond your nteenth reply, word-wrapping of the browser etc makes past comments difficult to read.  Of course it would be equally difficult in in html mode as the boxes would get more and more nested.

Not sure if your link here about html is relivent to the use of the ">" to indicate a quoted reply or not, although that wasn't really my question - which was about date format in the config file.

    icon2.gif   Re: kerberos authentication NOT working, posted by Olaf Kasten on Wed Nov 13 16:26:32 2013 

Andreas Luedeke wrote:

Hal Proctor wrote:

Fabio Sella wrote:

Hi guys,

we configured a kdc server using OPENLDAP as backend. We installed on it elog and configured the Kerberos Authentication on one logbook as follows:

Authentication = Kerberos, File
Kerberos Realm = TEST.COM
Password file = ./pwd.xml

 
Detect language » Italian
 

 

Even if the kinit comand is retrieving correctly a ticket for the user tsearch@TEST.COM(we see it using klist and tcpdump on lo interface), elogd kerberos authentication is not working.

We tried using tcpdump for troubleshooting but no traffic is generated on the loopback interface.

Did someone solve this problem or do you have an idea on how to make the kerberos authentication working?

Thanks

 I have asked for same help, and no one has answered with a solution on implementing a kerberos .  I saw exactly what you were seeing. (did you try fully qualifying the domain within the username field for logon?  \\TEST.COM\username)

I still couldn't get it to work

 Just my two cent:
- did you edit the Makefile to compile elogd with kerberos (USE_KRB5   = 1)?
- did you look into the elogd logfile for error messages at start-up or at login time?
I can only say that I got it working right away - that is the case when you learn least.
Maybe you should post your specific software versions: operating system (in my case Scientific Linux 5.1 (Boron)), Kerberos version (klist -V), etc.
 
English (auto-detected) » English
 

 I'm having same issue. Kerberos is working on Apache on same ubuntu 12.04 server. I used the USE_KRB5 option for compiling elog.

Does anyone  have an idea to solve that problem? 

    icon2.gif   Re: Error when attempted to submit an entry, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Nov 13 16:31:28 2013 

Hung Dao wrote:
One of my users reported that he received this error when attempted to submit an editing entry. Basically he is only one to edit this entry. When go ahead to press the button, the entry is updated successfully. What cause and how to prevent this error not to populate? Thanks

Please read the documentation in https://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html und the option "Use Lock". If you don't need locking, just turn it off.

    icon2.gif   Re: date and time, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Thu Nov 14 11:19:12 2013 
> [13 Nov]
> As my threads have lots of replies, I end up with a forest of ">" characters which makes it difficult to read
> earlier quoted entries (what with word-wrapping of the browser).
> I thought to replace the ">"s by a simple date entry prepended to the start of each reply. - much as I have 
> given at the top of this initial entry.
> 
> So this is what I put in the config file:
> 
> ....
> Time format = %a %d %b %y
> Date format = %d %b
> Prepend on reply = [$date] \n
> ...
> 
> The time is used in the string for the Thread display.
> 
> Only I don't get the date, with the date format, prepended to replies but the time, in the time format, as
> 
> [Wed 13 Nov 13]
> 
> Now this is hardly a disaster, but any ideas why the date formatting is being ignored?

Hi David,
yes, a $date is substituted with the "Time format" in the function build_subst_list().
I guess that is a bug, but it could break many existing logbooks to change it.
I leave this to Stefan.

There is a simple solution for your problem: you can execute a shell command.

Prepend on reply = $shell(date '+[%d %b]') \n
Reply string =

That snipped will do exactly what you want :-) (of course you need to have the "-x" option to start elogd.)

Kind Regards
Andreas
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6