Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 382 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown
  66440   Tue Jul 14 14:18:45 2009 Reply Mikemike@raghuexim.comBug reportLinux2.7.6-2207Re: Page Expired, Duplicate Entries & Thumbnail Woes?

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Mike wrote:

I talked to my associate from India. He tried that link you provided and claims that even on your

site the "page expired" message occurs. Weird eh? Any ideas?

Not much. Since they are the only ones reporting this problem, I'm tempted to attribute this to their local configuration (browser, proxy, etc.). Have they tried different browsers on different machines?

 I think you are right. I suggested those things to them. I believe this issue is closed here.

  67567   Tue Sep 24 17:38:33 2013 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.9.2Re: Packaging ELOG for Debian

Nicolas FRANCOIS wrote:

Hi.

I'd like to package ELOG for the new Debian. I'm a complete beginner in
this matter, but I spent some time configuring it for my desktop.

Could you help me do this (links to package maintainance, Elog tips,
security, former package maintainer...) ?

Thanks for any help.

--

Nicolas FRANCOIS                      |  /\
http://nicolas.francois.free.fr       | |__|
                      X--/\\
We are the Micro$oft.                _\_V
Resistance is futile.           
You will be assimilated.         darthvader penguin
 

I'm also not familiar with Debian, all I know is that the former maintainer was Recai Oktas. See here for example:

elog:1002

  69531   Tue May 10 22:40:26 2022 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfoLinuxallRe: PDF preview special steps to enable
I have a PDF file created by root which ImageMagic cannot convert to a .png file. If I do

convert img.pdf img.png

it works on my mac, but under RH7.4 the program goes into an infinite loop eating 100% CPU.

I attached the img.pdf, but compressed it to img.pdf.gz, otherwise I cannot post here.

Can anyone figure out why ImageMagick won't convert that file?
Attachment 1: img.pdf.gz
  69059   Sun Nov 17 14:55:11 2019 Reply Jan Christoph Terasaterasa@physik.uni-kiel.deQuestionLinuxV3.1.4-ba84827Re: PAM authentication question
David Wallis wrote:

I'm testing the PAM authentication feature, and have a couple questions, a suggestion, and a comment.

First the comment... it was pretty easy to get working, and is exactly what we need here, so thanks! Our PAM stack here is designed to allow logins with Active Directory, LDAP, or local accounts, so the PAM option preserves all of that.

The suggestion: In order to make it work, I had to add a symbolic link in /etc/pam.d:
    elogd -> system-auth
That might be considered for addition to the documentation (this was on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7)

The questions:

  1. The docs indicate that "Self register" must be set to >= 1, but in the code (elogd.c, line 26453), if the PAM module is enabled, Self register is overriden to 0. The result is that no "register as new user" link is displayed on the login screen. Is that the intent?
  2. Related... can PAM and File authentication both be enabled? We have some logbooks that are used by both internal people (with an A/D account) and outside collaborators that get local elog accounts. This works with LDAP + File, can it work with PAM?

Thanks in advance!

 

David, thank you for reporting on your findings regarding the PAM feature. I will look into the points you mentioned:

0. On my machines (Debian testing and stable) I did not have to add anything to /etc/pam.d, but apparently Debian just uses implicit defaults then, and REHL might insist on using excplicit settings. Adding a hint in the documentation is certainly useful, thank your for the suggestion. Maybe elog should provide a pam.d config file (which can be installed/adapted by package maintainers for various OSes).

1.+2. If I remember correctly, I intentionally disabled registration when using the PAM backend, because users will register using their passwd/LDAP/NIS users, and new users can only be regustered using the appropriate tools for the authentication mechanism used. This might not be correctly reflected in the docs, I will check that. In the light of question 2., I can also re-investigate that policy, so that logins will check against both the elog user database and PAM. Self-registering can then be enabled again, and new registrees will go to the elog database. I will try to bringthe code in line with how LDAP works.

 

regards,

Christoph

  69061   Thu Nov 21 18:10:28 2019 Reply David Walliswallis@aps.anl.govQuestionLinuxV3.1.4-ba84827Re: PAM authentication question

Hi Christoph,

Thanks for looking into this, if you can enable PAM + File, our users would be very happy!

The pam.d issue is probably related to CentOS/Red Hat, since our PAM expert warned me that it might be necessary.

Jan Christoph Terasa wrote:
David Wallis wrote:

I'm testing the PAM authentication feature, and have a couple questions, a suggestion, and a comment.

First the comment... it was pretty easy to get working, and is exactly what we need here, so thanks! Our PAM stack here is designed to allow logins with Active Directory, LDAP, or local accounts, so the PAM option preserves all of that.

The suggestion: In order to make it work, I had to add a symbolic link in /etc/pam.d:
    elogd -> system-auth
That might be considered for addition to the documentation (this was on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7)

The questions:

  1. The docs indicate that "Self register" must be set to >= 1, but in the code (elogd.c, line 26453), if the PAM module is enabled, Self register is overriden to 0. The result is that no "register as new user" link is displayed on the login screen. Is that the intent?
  2. Related... can PAM and File authentication both be enabled? We have some logbooks that are used by both internal people (with an A/D account) and outside collaborators that get local elog accounts. This works with LDAP + File, can it work with PAM?

Thanks in advance!

 

David, thank you for reporting on your findings regarding the PAM feature. I will look into the points you mentioned:

0. On my machines (Debian testing and stable) I did not have to add anything to /etc/pam.d, but apparently Debian just uses implicit defaults then, and REHL might insist on using excplicit settings. Adding a hint in the documentation is certainly useful, thank your for the suggestion. Maybe elog should provide a pam.d config file (which can be installed/adapted by package maintainers for various OSes).

1.+2. If I remember correctly, I intentionally disabled registration when using the PAM backend, because users will register using their passwd/LDAP/NIS users, and new users can only be regustered using the appropriate tools for the authentication mechanism used. This might not be correctly reflected in the docs, I will check that. In the light of question 2., I can also re-investigate that policy, so that logins will check against both the elog user database and PAM. Self-registering can then be enabled again, and new registrees will go to the elog database. I will try to bringthe code in line with how LDAP works.

 

regards,

Christoph

 

  69078   Thu Dec 19 17:46:33 2019 Reply Jan Christoph Terasaterasa@physik.uni-kiel.deQuestionLinuxV3.1.4-ba84827Re: PAM authentication question

Hi David,

sorry for the delay, I currently am very busy with other important work-related business, I hope I can find some time to look into this during christmas holiday season.

 

Have nice holidays,

Christoph

David Wallis wrote:

Hi Christoph,

Thanks for looking into this, if you can enable PAM + File, our users would be very happy!

The pam.d issue is probably related to CentOS/Red Hat, since our PAM expert warned me that it might be necessary.

Jan Christoph Terasa wrote:
David Wallis wrote:

I'm testing the PAM authentication feature, and have a couple questions, a suggestion, and a comment.

First the comment... it was pretty easy to get working, and is exactly what we need here, so thanks! Our PAM stack here is designed to allow logins with Active Directory, LDAP, or local accounts, so the PAM option preserves all of that.

The suggestion: In order to make it work, I had to add a symbolic link in /etc/pam.d:
    elogd -> system-auth
That might be considered for addition to the documentation (this was on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7)

The questions:

  1. The docs indicate that "Self register" must be set to >= 1, but in the code (elogd.c, line 26453), if the PAM module is enabled, Self register is overriden to 0. The result is that no "register as new user" link is displayed on the login screen. Is that the intent?
  2. Related... can PAM and File authentication both be enabled? We have some logbooks that are used by both internal people (with an A/D account) and outside collaborators that get local elog accounts. This works with LDAP + File, can it work with PAM?

Thanks in advance!

 

David, thank you for reporting on your findings regarding the PAM feature. I will look into the points you mentioned:

0. On my machines (Debian testing and stable) I did not have to add anything to /etc/pam.d, but apparently Debian just uses implicit defaults then, and REHL might insist on using excplicit settings. Adding a hint in the documentation is certainly useful, thank your for the suggestion. Maybe elog should provide a pam.d config file (which can be installed/adapted by package maintainers for various OSes).

1.+2. If I remember correctly, I intentionally disabled registration when using the PAM backend, because users will register using their passwd/LDAP/NIS users, and new users can only be regustered using the appropriate tools for the authentication mechanism used. This might not be correctly reflected in the docs, I will check that. In the light of question 2., I can also re-investigate that policy, so that logins will check against both the elog user database and PAM. Self-registering can then be enabled again, and new registrees will go to the elog database. I will try to bringthe code in line with how LDAP works.

 

regards,

Christoph

 

 

  69091   Fri Jan 24 17:33:14 2020 Reply Laurent Jean-Rigaudlollspam@free.frQuestionLinuxV3.1.4-283534dRe: PAM authentication question

Hi,

First, thanks to ELOG tool !

 

I'm trying to swicth a ELOG 3.1.2 server with local passwd DB to GIT version builded with SSL/PAM/LDAP options. I reuse the buildrpm script which generates correctly RPM files.

After installing on EL6 x86_64 server, i update the elogd.conf file according to GIT version doc :

  • Authentication = PAM
  • Password file = /usr/local/elog/elog_users.pam   (new file as i want to keep the old local DB)
  • Self register = 3

I add a link for pam module :

$ ll /etc/pam.d/elogd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Jan 24 16:23 /etc/pam.d/elogd -> system-auth

elogd starts well

elogd 3.1.4 built Jan 24 2020, 07:34:02 revision 283534d
Config file  : /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
Resource dir : /usr/local/elog/
Logbook dir  : /usr/local/elog/logbooks/
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
CKeditor detected
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "convert -version" > /tmp/elog_okY7qv 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/usr/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_xBge3f 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/usr/local/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_GfKWF0 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/opt/local/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_uZtajL 2>&1
ImageMagick NOT detected. Image scaling will not work.
Indexing logbook "logbook1" in "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/logbook1/" ... ok
Indexing logbook "logbook2" in "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/logbook2/" ... ok
Server listening on port 8080 ...

When i try to connect, ELOG login window shows "Invalid user name or password!" .

The logfile (level 9) shows :

24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] POST /logbook1/ HTTP/1.1
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] {MCO} LOGIN user "toto" (attempt)
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] {MCO} [PAM] Starting authentication for user toto
24-Jan-2020 16:36:29 [IP] {MCO} [PAM] Authentication not successful for user toto

The problem appears for all Linux users as well.

Does i miss something ?

Thanks for help.

Laurent

 

 

David Wallis wrote:

Hi Christoph,

Thanks for looking into this, if you can enable PAM + File, our users would be very happy!

The pam.d issue is probably related to CentOS/Red Hat, since our PAM expert warned me that it might be necessary.

Jan Christoph Terasa wrote:
David Wallis wrote:

I'm testing the PAM authentication feature, and have a couple questions, a suggestion, and a comment.

First the comment... it was pretty easy to get working, and is exactly what we need here, so thanks! Our PAM stack here is designed to allow logins with Active Directory, LDAP, or local accounts, so the PAM option preserves all of that.

The suggestion: In order to make it work, I had to add a symbolic link in /etc/pam.d:
    elogd -> system-auth
That might be considered for addition to the documentation (this was on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7)

The questions:

  1. The docs indicate that "Self register" must be set to >= 1, but in the code (elogd.c, line 26453), if the PAM module is enabled, Self register is overriden to 0. The result is that no "register as new user" link is displayed on the login screen. Is that the intent?
  2. Related... can PAM and File authentication both be enabled? We have some logbooks that are used by both internal people (with an A/D account) and outside collaborators that get local elog accounts. This works with LDAP + File, can it work with PAM?

Thanks in advance!

 

David, thank you for reporting on your findings regarding the PAM feature. I will look into the points you mentioned:

0. On my machines (Debian testing and stable) I did not have to add anything to /etc/pam.d, but apparently Debian just uses implicit defaults then, and REHL might insist on using excplicit settings. Adding a hint in the documentation is certainly useful, thank your for the suggestion. Maybe elog should provide a pam.d config file (which can be installed/adapted by package maintainers for various OSes).

1.+2. If I remember correctly, I intentionally disabled registration when using the PAM backend, because users will register using their passwd/LDAP/NIS users, and new users can only be regustered using the appropriate tools for the authentication mechanism used. This might not be correctly reflected in the docs, I will check that. In the light of question 2., I can also re-investigate that policy, so that logins will check against both the elog user database and PAM. Self-registering can then be enabled again, and new registrees will go to the elog database. I will try to bringthe code in line with how LDAP works.

 

regards,

Christoph

 

 

  69092   Fri Jan 24 18:13:03 2020 Reply Jan Christoph Terasaterasa@physik.uni-kiel.deQuestionLinuxV3.1.4-283534dRe: PAM authentication question

Hi Laurent,

does the ELOG server show the window immediately before even showing the login mask?

 

Christoph

Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote:

Hi,

First, thanks to ELOG tool !

 

I'm trying to swicth a ELOG 3.1.2 server with local passwd DB to GIT version builded with SSL/PAM/LDAP options. I reuse the buildrpm script which generates correctly RPM files.

After installing on EL6 x86_64 server, i update the elogd.conf file according to GIT version doc :

  • Authentication = PAM
  • Password file = /usr/local/elog/elog_users.pam   (new file as i want to keep the old local DB)
  • Self register = 3

I add a link for pam module :

$ ll /etc/pam.d/elogd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Jan 24 16:23 /etc/pam.d/elogd -> system-auth

elogd starts well

elogd 3.1.4 built Jan 24 2020, 07:34:02 revision 283534d
Config file  : /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
Resource dir : /usr/local/elog/
Logbook dir  : /usr/local/elog/logbooks/
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
CKeditor detected
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "convert -version" > /tmp/elog_okY7qv 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/usr/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_xBge3f 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/usr/local/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_GfKWF0 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/opt/local/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_uZtajL 2>&1
ImageMagick NOT detected. Image scaling will not work.
Indexing logbook "logbook1" in "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/logbook1/" ... ok
Indexing logbook "logbook2" in "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/logbook2/" ... ok
Server listening on port 8080 ...

When i try to connect, ELOG login window shows "Invalid user name or password!" .

The logfile (level 9) shows :

24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] POST /logbook1/ HTTP/1.1
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] {MCO} LOGIN user "toto" (attempt)
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] {MCO} [PAM] Starting authentication for user toto
24-Jan-2020 16:36:29 [IP] {MCO} [PAM] Authentication not successful for user toto

The problem appears for all Linux users as well.

Does i miss something ?

Thanks for help.

Laurent

 

 

David Wallis wrote:

Hi Christoph,

Thanks for looking into this, if you can enable PAM + File, our users would be very happy!

The pam.d issue is probably related to CentOS/Red Hat, since our PAM expert warned me that it might be necessary.

Jan Christoph Terasa wrote:
David Wallis wrote:

I'm testing the PAM authentication feature, and have a couple questions, a suggestion, and a comment.

First the comment... it was pretty easy to get working, and is exactly what we need here, so thanks! Our PAM stack here is designed to allow logins with Active Directory, LDAP, or local accounts, so the PAM option preserves all of that.

The suggestion: In order to make it work, I had to add a symbolic link in /etc/pam.d:
    elogd -> system-auth
That might be considered for addition to the documentation (this was on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7)

The questions:

  1. The docs indicate that "Self register" must be set to >= 1, but in the code (elogd.c, line 26453), if the PAM module is enabled, Self register is overriden to 0. The result is that no "register as new user" link is displayed on the login screen. Is that the intent?
  2. Related... can PAM and File authentication both be enabled? We have some logbooks that are used by both internal people (with an A/D account) and outside collaborators that get local elog accounts. This works with LDAP + File, can it work with PAM?

Thanks in advance!

 

David, thank you for reporting on your findings regarding the PAM feature. I will look into the points you mentioned:

0. On my machines (Debian testing and stable) I did not have to add anything to /etc/pam.d, but apparently Debian just uses implicit defaults then, and REHL might insist on using excplicit settings. Adding a hint in the documentation is certainly useful, thank your for the suggestion. Maybe elog should provide a pam.d config file (which can be installed/adapted by package maintainers for various OSes).

1.+2. If I remember correctly, I intentionally disabled registration when using the PAM backend, because users will register using their passwd/LDAP/NIS users, and new users can only be regustered using the appropriate tools for the authentication mechanism used. This might not be correctly reflected in the docs, I will check that. In the light of question 2., I can also re-investigate that policy, so that logins will check against both the elog user database and PAM. Self-registering can then be enabled again, and new registrees will go to the elog database. I will try to bringthe code in line with how LDAP works.

 

regards,

Christoph

 

 

 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6