Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 398 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Show attachments  Show only new entries    6457 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 397, 398, 399 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  66637   Wed Dec 2 11:57:09 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.7.7-2271Re: default Status descending

Terry Shuck wrote:

Thanks for the quick response. This works. I noticed that the Dates aren't descending, is there a way to have the dates descending while sorting Status?

Thanks again!

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Terry Shuck wrote:

Is there a way to configure ELOG to default to the Status column in descending order rather than the Date in descending order?

Thanks

Sort attributes = Status

... as written in the manual. 

 

For this you need

Sort attributes = Status, Date

which however only works from version 2.7.8 on. 

  66636   Tue Dec 1 15:11:19 2009 Reply Terry Shuckt.lshuck@gmail.comQuestionWindows2.7.7-2271Re: default Status descending

Thanks for the quick response. This works. I noticed that the Dates aren't descending, is there a way to have the dates descending while sorting Status?

Thanks again!

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Terry Shuck wrote:

Is there a way to configure ELOG to default to the Status column in descending order rather than the Date in descending order?

Thanks

Sort attributes = Status

... as written in the manual. 

 

  66635   Tue Dec 1 14:23:44 2009 Reply Michael Dannmeyermichael.dannmeyer@solvias.comQuestionWindows2.7.5-2130Re: Extend fields in ELOG

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Michael Dannmeyer wrote:

I want to extend the usage of ELOG and have 2 Questions:

1. Is it possible to have Fields which only appears if another selection is done? e.g. I create a new entry. This new entry has a type field. If I chose the Type "ABC" another field appears where the departemnt could be choosen. If I select Type "DEF" the Department field does not appear.

2. I have a field Status. This is a predefined field with 3 entries (New,  under progress, closed). If i change the status field time, date old and new status should be logged or written in the text field. I can log this with the answer field with a new ID. But is there any other way to log it in the text field or log it with no new ID? 

Can i implement the wishes above? If yes how does it work?

Thanks for your help

Michael

1. is simple, just use conditional attributes like:

Attributes = Author, Type, Status, Revisions, Department
Options Type = ABD{1}, DEF{2}
Show Attributes Edit = Author, Type, Status, Revisions
{1}Show Attributes Edit = Author, Type, Status, Revisions, Department
{2}Show Attributes Edit = Author, Type, Status, Revisions

2. is more complicated. Have a look at FAQ # 11. Try something like:

Options Status = New, Under progress, Closed
Subst Revisions = $date status $status
Subst on Edit Revisions = $Revisions<br>$date status $status

But when testing this, I realized that there is a bug in elog and the subsitution is done before the submission, not after. I fixed that in SVN revision 2263, so it will be contained in the next Windows release.
 

 Hello,

i tried

Options Status = New, Under progress, Closed
Subst Revisions = $date status $status
Subst on Edit Revisions = $Revisions<br>$date status $status

but it won't work. When I change the status i saw an information in the status bar of Internet Explorer like "Entry has changed" (Eintrag wurde verändert) but it is not written in the notes field. Or is it written to another field?  

Do I have to update first to the latest Windows Version? You wrote something about SVN revision 2263. When do you expect the windows version where this problem is fixed is available to download?  
 

Best Reagrds

Michael

 

  66634   Tue Dec 1 14:22:28 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.7.7-2271Re: default Status descending

Terry Shuck wrote:

Is there a way to configure ELOG to default to the Status column in descending order rather than the Date in descending order?

Thanks

Sort attributes = Status

... as written in the manual. 

  66633   Tue Dec 1 14:20:04 2009 Question Terry Shuckt.lshuck@gmail.comQuestionWindows2.7.7-2271default Status descending

Is there a way to configure ELOG to default to the Status column in descending order rather than the Date in descending order?

Thanks

  66632   Thu Nov 26 20:37:02 2009 Agree David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukBug reportLinux2.7.7-Re: "Reply to" Author in this forum
> > Hi Stefan,
> > 
> > This has happened twice on this forum now, starting from Mon 23rd November.
> > 
> > Someone submits an entry (Me, 66625, Bertram Metz 66628)
> > I assume you post a reply (66626, 66629), but it shows up as if I or Bertram are the author of the reply, not
> > yourself.  My reply to you (66627) was really authored by me, and I expressed puzzlement then at this point.
> > 
> > Is this a bug, or some wierd affect of us forgetting to log out?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > David.
> 
> Thanks for pointing out this issue. This bug was introduced recently, when I tried to avoid the
> 
> Re: Re: Re: ...
> 
> in the subject line. I changed this now completely so that we can have
> 
> Preset on reply Author = $full_name
> Preset on first reply Subject = Re: $Subject
> 
> which fixes both things. The modification is in revision 2271.

Thanks Stefan!
  66631   Thu Nov 26 17:42:02 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.7.7-Re: "Reply to" Author in this forum
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> This has happened twice on this forum now, starting from Mon 23rd November.
> 
> Someone submits an entry (Me, 66625, Bertram Metz 66628)
> I assume you post a reply (66626, 66629), but it shows up as if I or Bertram are the author of the reply, not
> yourself.  My reply to you (66627) was really authored by me, and I expressed puzzlement then at this point.
> 
> Is this a bug, or some wierd affect of us forgetting to log out?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> David.

Thanks for pointing out this issue. This bug was introduced recently, when I tried to avoid the

Re: Re: Re: ...

in the subject line. I changed this now completely so that we can have

Preset on reply Author = $full_name
Preset on first reply Subject = Re: $Subject

which fixes both things. The modification is in revision 2271.
  66630   Thu Nov 26 14:27:27 2009 Question David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukBug reportLinux2.7.7-"Reply to" Author in this forum
Hi Stefan,

This has happened twice on this forum now, starting from Mon 23rd November.

Someone submits an entry (Me, 66625, Bertram Metz 66628)
I assume you post a reply (66626, 66629), but it shows up as if I or Bertram are the author of the reply, not
yourself.  My reply to you (66627) was really authored by me, and I expressed puzzlement then at this point.

Is this a bug, or some wierd affect of us forgetting to log out?

Regards,

David.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 397, 398, 399 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6