Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 408 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Emaildown Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  66211   Wed Feb 18 20:03:12 2009 Question Nuruzzamannur@jlab.orgInfoWindows2.7.5How to share with others

Please tell me how to share my elog with people.

  827   Mon Dec 6 02:34:32 2004 Question Steve Allenns@elogicsystems.comQuestionAll2.5.5-2external authentication possible?
In order to avoid having to remember multiple usernames/passwords for
different systems, is it possible for ELOG to use external authentication
via Active Directory, etc?

Thanks,
Steve
  834   Tue Dec 7 01:18:14 2004 Smile Steve Allenns@elogicsystems.comInfoAll2.5.5-2Re: external authentication possible?
> > > In order to avoid having to remember multiple usernames/passwords for
> > > different systems, is it possible for ELOG to use external authentication
> > > via Active Directory, etc?
> > 
> > Not yet.
> 
> I would note that this is a request that comes in fairly frequently, but to
> Stephan's credit (and looking back at previous comments) the task of trying to
> implement authentication that would *not* be a maintenance nightmare basically
> pushes such a request down to the bottom of the list.
> 
> The only common denominator that could possibly cover all contingencies would
> be LDAP authentication.  One way of doing this in a more-or-less universal
> fashion is to offload the auth task from eLog itself and place the burden on
> Apache.  This means figuring out how to get Apache to pass auth info to eLog
> when eLog operates behind Apache.  In the end, anything that can use LDAP as an
> authentication mechanism (like AD) can host eLog - as long as eLog can glom off
> of Apache's ability to do the actual authenticating.  
> 
> For our twiki (source from twiki.org) website, we use the following config:
> 
> -- In Apache http.conf
> LoadModule auth_ldap_module   libexec/auth_ldap.so
> 
> AddModule auth_ldap.c
> 
> AccessFileName .htaccess
> 
> # Twiki
> Include /proj/www/twiki/conf/httpd.conf
> 
> 
> -- The http.conf in the Twiki directory
> <VirtualHost *>
>         DocumentRoot "/proj/www/twiki/html"
>         ServerName twiki
>         ErrorLog error_log
>         CustomLog access_log combined
>         <Directory "/proj/www/twiki/html/bin/">
>                 Options +ExecCGI
>                 allow from all
>                 AllowOverride Authconfig FileInfo Indexes Limit Options
>         </Directory>
>         <Location /bin>
>                 Options +ExecCGI
>                 AuthType Basic
>                 AuthName CoreID
>         CustomLog access_log combined
>         <Directory "/proj/www/twiki/html/bin/">
>                 Options +ExecCGI
>                 allow from all
>                 AllowOverride Authconfig FileInfo Indexes Limit Options
>         </Directory>
>         <Location /bin>
>                 Options +ExecCGI
>                 AuthType Basic
>                 AuthName ID
>                 AuthLDAPURL
> ldap://ldap.co.com:389/ou=People,ou=Intranet,dc=co,dc=com?uid?sub?(objectClass=*)
>                 require valid-user
>                 allow from all
>                 <Limit OPTIONS>
>                         Order Deny,Allow
>                         Deny from all
>                 </LIMIT>
>         </Location>
> </VirtualHost>
> 
> --- Then the DocumentRoot ("/proj/www/twiki/html") has a '.htaccess' file with
> the following:
> 
> RedirectPermenant       /       http://twiki.co.com/bin/view.cgi
> 
> --- Also in the /bin directory we have:
> 
> Redirect http://twiki.sps.mot.com/index.html http://twiki.sps.mot.com/bin/view.cgi
> 
> AuthType                 Basic
> AuthName                 "LDAP Login"
> AuthLDAPURL
> ldap://ldap.co.com:389/ou=People,ou=Intranet,dc=co,dc=com?uid?sub?(objectClass=*)
> 
> 
> SetHandler cgi-script
> 
> ErrorDocument 401 /bin/oops.cgi/TWiki/TWikiRegistration?template=oopsauth
> 
> <Files ~ "[^/]*\.html$">
>        SetHandler blabla
>        allow from all
> </Files>
> 
> <Files "*">
>        require valid-user
>         allow from all
> </Files>
> -------------------------
> 
> Whether this is at all relevant, well . . . . 

Food for thought--thanks!
  68934   Wed Apr 24 09:15:26 2019 Question Nikolas Patronisnpatronis@uoi.grQuestionLinux3.1.3exclude access to a number of users in one logbook

How can I exclude the access of a number of users in one (out of two) logbooks running in the same server and URL?

  68576   Wed Feb 8 16:38:15 2017 Smile fbretelnothx@hello.comBug reportLinux3.1.1Possible misuse of email headers Message-Id and In-Reply-To

Hi,

As mentionned before, we happen to fail to receive email messages related to updates on elog entries at our site. My understanding is that the SMTP header Message-Id MUST be unique for each email message. Whereas all elogd email messages get something like <logbook>-<entryId>@<domain>. See source code. For this header to become unique, there should be a random part in it.

Having the same Message-Id in multiple email messages results in only the first one being delivered on some email systems.

Moreover, elogd sets the In-Reply-To: header in the same manner (<logbook>-<entryId>@<domain>). Which is incorrect because this header relates to email messages, not elog entries, and should contain the email Message-Id of the email message to which it replies, itself handled by the email messaing system. But elogd hasn't received any email messsage in the first place. So I believe this header should simply be dropped.

I think I can provide a pull request on bitbucket for the Message-Id issue, and probably also for the In-Reply-To: if you decide it can be removed.

Cheers

  68578   Wed Mar 15 16:04:13 2017 Reply fbretelnothx@hello.comBug reportLinux3.1.1Re: Possible misuse of email headers Message-Id and In-Reply-To

Pull-request posted. Cheers.

  67509   Sat May 18 17:41:51 2013 Entry Normnormthompson@yahoo.comBug reportWindowsUnknownApplication failed to initialize properly

I attempted to install the newest version of elog on our site elog server from an old old version.  Around 2008 I believe.  I then received an application failed to initialize properly 0xc0150002 after installing the newest version.  I then tried installing the Feb 2013 version and received the same message.  Panicked, I rolled back our server to its state yesterday.  I would like to update our elog software, anyone know why I am receiving this error??

  67512   Sat May 25 16:09:58 2013 Reply Normnormthompson@yahoo.comBug reportWindowsUnknownRe: Application failed to initialize properly

Andreas Luedeke wrote:

Norm wrote:

I attempted to install the newest version of elog on our site elog server from an old old version.  Around 2008 I believe.  I then received an application failed to initialize properly 0xc0150002 after installing the newest version.  I then tried installing the Feb 2013 version and received the same message.  Panicked, I rolled back our server to its state yesterday.  I would like to update our elog software, anyone know why I am receiving this error??

 Hi Norm. I have not much experience with windows, but I can give you my two cent on how to proceed:

  • Check the old elogd version. It is shown at the bottom of your elog web page (this forum shows ELOG V2.9.2-2475).
  • Copy your logbook data to a different PC, maybe your office PC.
  • Then compile the latest elog on your office PC, run it with the copied data and access it as http://localhost:8080 (or whatever port number you are using)
  • If it is still crashing: re-compile it using "make debug" and run it from a debugger (I don't know any C-debugger for Windows). Post the precise error message.
 
Detect language » English
 

Good luck!

 Thanks for the reply.  I just got back from a business trip and I will try this ASAP.  Thanks and I will be posting the error message.

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6