ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
68103
|
Mon Aug 31 09:38:38 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Bug fix | Windows | V3.1.1-3f311c5 | Re: Draft saved is treated as an entry edit | Hi Daniel,
this is an undesired side effect of a new feature. I wouldn't call it a bug ;-)
There is no straight forward way for elog to distinguish between a "Submit" and an automatic save. Therefore the "... on edit = ..." kicks in when an entry is saved automatically.
I guess Stefan can figure out a workaround, but for the moment I would sugest that you just switch off the auto save feature -- if you want to keep your save history:
Save drafts = 0
Cheers
Andreas
Daniel Sajdyk wrote:Save drafts = 0 |
Hello.
In Elog i have attribute called "Zmieniano" (eng. changed) which should store how many times entry was edited. If entry was not edited it should have only preset value "oryginalny wpis" (eng. oryginal entry), but when I edit it, it should have also date, time, and person who make edit (this is made by "Subst on Edit Zmieniano = $Zmieniano<br>- Zmiana $date przez $long_name z $remote_host)".
From version V3.1.1-3f311c5 I have problem with that.
When I add entry, and entry is auto saved, then auto save is shown in the attribute "Zmieniano" (eng. changed) as an next edit, which I dont want. Entry from attached screenshot was not edited, but in "Zmieniano" (eng. changed) attributes it has two values:
- Oryginalny wpis (eng. oryginal entry),
- Zmiana 27.08.2015, 10:52 przez Daniel Sajdyk z serwerownia.sr.lez (eng. Changed 27.08.2015.... )
The second value is autosave time.
Is this a bug?
Regards
Daniel.
|
|
68104
|
Mon Aug 31 13:12:09 2015 |
| Daniel Sajdyk | daniel.sajdyk@gmail.com | Bug fix | Windows | V3.1.1-3f311c5 | Re: Draft saved is treated as an entry edit | Hi Andreas and thank you very much for explanation ;)
So, we'll have to wait for new version which will correct this.
Cheers
Daniel.
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hi Daniel,
this is an undesired side effect of a new feature. I wouldn't call it a bug ;-)
There is no straight forward way for elog to distinguish between a "Submit" and an automatic save. Therefore the "... on edit = ..." kicks in when an entry is saved automatically.
I guess Stefan can figure out a workaround, but for the moment I would sugest that you just switch off the auto save feature -- if you want to keep your save history:
Save drafts = 0
Cheers
Andreas
Daniel Sajdyk wrote:Save drafts = 0 |
Hello.
In Elog i have attribute called "Zmieniano" (eng. changed) which should store how many times entry was edited. If entry was not edited it should have only preset value "oryginalny wpis" (eng. oryginal entry), but when I edit it, it should have also date, time, and person who make edit (this is made by "Subst on Edit Zmieniano = $Zmieniano<br>- Zmiana $date przez $long_name z $remote_host)".
From version V3.1.1-3f311c5 I have problem with that.
When I add entry, and entry is auto saved, then auto save is shown in the attribute "Zmieniano" (eng. changed) as an next edit, which I dont want. Entry from attached screenshot was not edited, but in "Zmieniano" (eng. changed) attributes it has two values:
- Oryginalny wpis (eng. oryginal entry),
- Zmiana 27.08.2015, 10:52 przez Daniel Sajdyk z serwerownia.sr.lez (eng. Changed 27.08.2015.... )
The second value is autosave time.
Is this a bug?
Regards
Daniel.
|
|
|
68105
|
Mon Aug 31 17:14:08 2015 |
| Eric Quintero | ericq@caltech.edu | Question | All | 3.0.0-70b274b | Re: Show attachments = 0 | The automatic hiding behavior is what I'm after, and I've discovered that it is only a problem for PDF attachments. I have reproduced this on the demo logbook on git revision f828049.
I've taken a look at the source you mentioned, but as far as I can tell, it is just looking for the opening of the img tag in the HTML source, and I'm not sure why that is different for a PDF. |
68112
|
Fri Sep 4 10:04:20 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1 | Re: User based theme selection | No, I don't think it is possible.
Oliver Kleinau wrote: |
Hi, is it somehow possible to use different themes for different users? Perhaps editing the password XML file? Thanks, Oliver |
|
Draft
|
Mon Sep 21 10:14:50 2015 |
| Edmund Hertle | edmund.hertle@kit.edu | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.0(elogd) | Re: elog client overwriting attached files when editing existing log | Hey,
I think this is a "problem" of the elog client, since it simply replaces the data. In most cases this is what you want, but since I wanted to have the option to append to the acutal message I built a function to first read-back the entry and add to the message instead of replacing it.
I just played around a bit and found that the attachments will be even disconnected, if you do not specify the -f parameter but just edit a different part of this entry.
A work-around for this is tricky. I tried to write to the "Attachment" attribute directly (-a "Attachment=Filename'), since then you coud read back the data first and manually add the filenames again. But this does not work.
Since the attachments are not actually removed, the only option I see is to modify the logbook file entry on the server by manually re-adding the filenames to the "Attachment: " line. But
Joseph McKenna wrote: |
Using the elog client to upload atachments, I can successfully send attachments to an existing elog, however the existing attachments are lost.
I have tested using the elog client version 3.1.1 and elog client version 2.9.2 sending to elogd 2.9.0
elog -h localhost -p 8080 -l test -f file1.png -f file2.png -e 249 -v -x
This works great, the text contained in the elog post is retained, however all attachments are lost and replaced with those sent by this command.
Can anyone provide some tips? I am not sure if its a problem with the client or server.
Thank you in advance!
Joseph
|
|
68118
|
Mon Sep 21 10:48:31 2015 |
| Edmund Hertle | edmund.hertle@kit.edu | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.0(elogd) | Re: elog client overwriting attached files when editing existing log | Hey,
I think this is a "problem" of the elog client, since it simply replaces the data. In most cases this is what you want, but since I wanted to have the option to append to the acutal message I built a function to first read-back the entry and add to the message instead of replacing it.
I just played around a bit and found that the attachments will be even disconnected, if you do not specify the -f parameter but just edit a different part of this entry.
A work-around for this is tricky. I tried to write to the "Attachment" attribute directly (-a "Attachment=Filename'), since then you coud read back the data first and manually add the filenames again. But this does not work.
Since the attachments are not actually removed, the only option I see is to modify the logbook file entry on the server by manually re-adding the filenames to the "Attachment: " line.
Joseph McKenna wrote: |
Using the elog client to upload atachments, I can successfully send attachments to an existing elog, however the existing attachments are lost.
I have tested using the elog client version 3.1.1 and elog client version 2.9.2 sending to elogd 2.9.0
elog -h localhost -p 8080 -l test -f file1.png -f file2.png -e 249 -v -x
This works great, the text contained in the elog post is retained, however all attachments are lost and replaced with those sent by this command.
Can anyone provide some tips? I am not sure if its a problem with the client or server.
Thank you in advance!
Joseph
|
|
68119
|
Mon Sep 21 17:08:44 2015 |
| Edmund Hertle | edmund.hertle@kit.edu | Question | Windows | 2.7.3 | Re: Syntax for conditional list display | Hey Terry,
I don't think this is possible, since in general you cannot define config settings in a way that it would only affect specific users. For example, you also cannot have different themes for different users (as stated here: https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/68112 )
Cheers
eddy
Terry L wrote: |
Good Morning,
I would like to limit the ability to edit certain attributes in an ELOG logbook, depending on the user who is logged in. I.e. if "guest" or a standard "login user" is logged in, I only want to allow the user to edit "attribute1" & "attribute2" of say, 5 attributes. However, if an Admin user or specific user, say "Terry" or "Bob" is logged in, I want to allow ALL 5 attributes to be editable. To expand on this, I may want to even limit the visibility of the attributes as well.
I've read though "Condition Attributes" section of the help page, but it is not clear to me how/if I can do this? Is that section even relevant to what I want to accomplish?
Can anyone provide some guidance?
Thank you for your time & help!
Sincerely,
Terry
|
|
68126
|
Fri Sep 25 22:24:18 2015 |
| Edmund Hertle | edmund.hertle@kit.edu | Question | Windows | Current | Re: Submit to multiple logbooks simultaniously | Hey,
You can use the elog command line tool and submit the same attributes to the 5 different logbooks by iterating over the logbook names executing something like this:
elog -l logbook1 -a "attr1=value1" -a "attr2=value2"
elog -l logbook2 -a "attr1=value1" -a "attr2=value2"
elog -l logbook3 -a "attr1=value1" -a "attr2=value2"
elog -l logbook4 -a "attr1=value1" -a "attr2=value2"
elog -l logbook5 -a "attr1=value1" -a "attr2=value2"
Another option would be having an additional common logbook, removing the commonly shared attributes from the other logbooks and add an attribute which links to this entry (using the "elog:logbook/ID" syntax as a value).
Cheers, eddy
Francois Cloutier wrote: |
Good day,
My question is : Is it possible to submit to multiple logbooks simultaniously ?
I have 5 logbooks that could share common attributes, is there a way to acheive that without recreate a new entry in each of them ?
Thanks for your help.
|
|
|