ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66450
|
Mon Jul 20 10:30:44 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.6 | Re: Elog Crashes |
lance wrote: |
Stefan,
Our log is crashing on a regular basis and I have been unable to identify the reason. Now the if the log crashes that is not a major problem however when you try to stop the daemon from the services it fails to stop. This means that the daemon cannot be restarted. The only way then is to start killing processes. This is not something I want none experienced guys to do.
Looking at the processes is look like the elogd.exe is still running and doesn’t die when you try to stop the daemon service.
I checked the times it was crashing with events in the elog logfiles but there was nothing actually happening at these times. It seems something is causing it to just hang.
I have attached the eventlog files for you if you have any ideas I would appreciate them.
I have not run the log in verbose mode as I have thus far been unable to redirect the output of the screen in order to see what is happening. If you have any tips on how to redirect the output I would save the file for off line analysis. Our log is used 24/7 therefore it is critical that it be kept running so if I was to run it with the –v option the guys would have to restart it and I would lose the data.
Any help is much appreciated
Regards,
Lance
|
Using the Windows event log won't help much. I guess in your case elogd is driven into some kind of endless loop (does the CPU go to 100%???). There are only two possibilities to tackle this:
1) You find a way to reliably reproduce this problem, tell me how to do this. When I can reproduce it here, I can fix it easily.
2) You do debugging yourself. Under Linux this is simple, since you have debuggers on most systems. Under Windows however, you first have to install the Visual C++ development environment. I believe there is a free version (Express?) which you can use. You then run elogd under the debugger, and when it hangs you investigate where. This needs some basic knowledge about C++ development and I'm not sure if you have this, but maybe you can find someone around you who does. |
66461
|
Mon Jul 27 01:39:18 2009 |
| Jay Johnstone | jay.johnstone@gmail.com | Question | Windows | 2.7.6 | Changing Entry Time | Hi,
I am new to eLog, trying to make a logbook tool. This is probably a question with a simple answer, but here it is... I need to be able to edit the entry time for an entry as it is being made and also in Edit mode later. We have field staff who use a paper log in the field and then come back to the computer later and create the log entries, and they need to be time stamped to reflect when an event happened, not when the entry is put into the log.
I'm guessing I'm missing something easy in my Config file, I've looked through the config examples and searched the forum but I couldn't come up with an example of how to make this work.
Thanks in advance!
Jay |
66462
|
Mon Jul 27 08:40:50 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.6 | Re: Changing Entry Time |
Jay Johnstone wrote: |
Hi,
I am new to eLog, trying to make a logbook tool. This is probably a question with a simple answer, but here it is... I need to be able to edit the entry time for an entry as it is being made and also in Edit mode later. We have field staff who use a paper log in the field and then come back to the computer later and create the log entries, and they need to be time stamped to reflect when an event happened, not when the entry is put into the log.
I'm guessing I'm missing something easy in my Config file, I've looked through the config examples and searched the forum but I couldn't come up with an example of how to make this work.
Thanks in advance!
Jay
|
Hi Jay,
the entry time cannot be changed, because it should reflect the real time when the entry was made. What you can do in your case is to define a "datetime" attribute, which contains then the time stamp. You need something like this:
Attributes = Author, Field time, Subject
Type Field time = datetime
... |
66463
|
Mon Jul 27 09:25:06 2009 |
| Jay Johnstone | jay.johnstone@gmail.com | Question | Windows | 2.7.6 | Re: Changing Entry Time |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Jay Johnstone wrote: |
Hi,
I am new to eLog, trying to make a logbook tool. This is probably a question with a simple answer, but here it is... I need to be able to edit the entry time for an entry as it is being made and also in Edit mode later. We have field staff who use a paper log in the field and then come back to the computer later and create the log entries, and they need to be time stamped to reflect when an event happened, not when the entry is put into the log.
I'm guessing I'm missing something easy in my Config file, I've looked through the config examples and searched the forum but I couldn't come up with an example of how to make this work.
Thanks in advance!
Jay
|
Hi Jay,
the entry time cannot be changed, because it should reflect the real time when the entry was made. What you can do in your case is to define a "datetime" attribute, which contains then the time stamp. You need something like this:
Attributes = Author, Field time, Subject
Type Field time = datetime
...
|
Hi, Stefan,
Thanks for the quick reply, I've added that to my config and it does what we need.
Cheers, Jay |
66464
|
Mon Jul 27 10:20:14 2009 |
| T. Ribbrock | emgaron+elog@ribbrock.org | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.6 | Wrong error message if invalid attribute is used | I just ran into this little bug: I had defined a new logbook in my config file and suddenly got the message Attribute "Date" not allowed. While I did have several attributes starting with the word "Date" (e.g. "Date In Service", "Date Retired") I had no attribute "Date" in there. After some pondering and wildly commenting out lines, it finally dawned on me: I had used an attribute "ID" - which is also not allowed. However, it would be very helpful if the error message actually reflected that...  |
66465
|
Mon Jul 27 10:49:19 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.6 | Re: Wrong error message if invalid attribute is used |
T. Ribbrock wrote: |
I just ran into this little bug: I had defined a new logbook in my config file and suddenly got the message Attribute "Date" not allowed. While I did have several attributes starting with the word "Date" (e.g. "Date In Service", "Date Retired") I had no attribute "Date" in there. After some pondering and wildly commenting out lines, it finally dawned on me: I had used an attribute "ID" - which is also not allowed. However, it would be very helpful if the error message actually reflected that... 
|
Oops, just a typo. The message Attribute "Date" not allowed should read Attribute "ID" not allowed. Fixed in the current SVN version. |
66466
|
Mon Jul 27 18:02:14 2009 |
| Devin Bougie | dab66@lepp.cornell.edu | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.6 | attachment not displayed if entry contains link to attachment. | I'm not sure if this is the expected behavior, but it appears as though an attachment is not displayed in the list of attachments if you manually add a link to the attachment into the body of the entry. I would greatly appreciate any advice on how to fix or change this behavior.
I will try to demonstrate with the two attachments on this entry. There are two attachments in this entry, but only one appears in the standard view of the entry.
Picture_1.png.png
Many thanks,
Devin |
Attachment 1: Picture_1.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Picture_2.png
|
|
66468
|
Tue Jul 28 10:42:40 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.6 | Re: attachment not displayed if entry contains link to attachment. |
Devin Bougie wrote: |
I'm not sure if this is the expected behavior, but it appears as though an attachment is not displayed in the list of attachments if you manually add a link to the attachment into the body of the entry. I would greatly appreciate any advice on how to fix or change this behavior.
I will try to demonstrate with the two attachments on this entry. There are two attachments in this entry, but only one appears in the standard view of the entry.
Picture_1.png.png
Many thanks,
Devin
|
Well, you can have "inline" pictures like that:
In this case it is clumsy if this image gets displayed twice, once in the text and once as the attachment. So I look at the entry and if I find the image inlined, I suppress the display at the end. Now the "check if the image is shown inline" is a bit stupid, it just looks for the link. So I never thought that someone would just put a link in the text manually. I will have a look and see if I can change that. |
|