ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66177
|
Tue Jan 27 12:30:26 2009 |
| Carsten Elftmann | Carsten.Elftmann@BkiTech.de | Question | Windows | 2.7.5-2130 | Re: Error Message in HTML or Java Script alert |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Carsten Elftmann wrote: |
I have there a problem with the error message at required attributes.
I have two logbooks with identical settings,
in one the errror message appears as Javascript Alert,
in the other one as html-page, and after using the back button the entered text disapear.
Same I have in this forum.
|
Can you describe what you exactly enter in this forum to produce the error so that I can reproduce it?
|
I could not produce this error here again, so I work on that:
There was a attribute with Type = Date, Preset = $Date.
This added following js code
for (var i=0 ; i<document.form1.y0.value.length ; i++) if ((document.form1.y0.value.charAt(i) < "0" || document.form1.y0.value.charAt(i) > "9")) { break }
This cause in following error
Fehler: document.form1.y0 is undefined Quelldatei: http://elog1.bkitech.de/Test-Maengelbericht/?cmd=Neu Zeile: 16
After that error none js will be executed.
After remarking the Type line, all work well.
|
66176
|
Tue Jan 27 09:19:22 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug fix | Linux | 2.7.5 | Re: convert: unrecognized option '-set' | > Hello,
>
> We are now running elog-2.7.5 in a Scientific Linux 4 (RHEL4) system, which uses ImageMagick 6.0.7.1. After uploading an image, the image
> manipulation buttons don't work and complain:
> convert: unrecognized option '-set'
>
> We are using an RPM built from source, and it looks like I should be able to just change "-set comment ..." to "-comment" as in:
> ------
> [dab66@lnx100 tmp]% diff elogd.c elogd.c.new
> 22601c22601
> < sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
> ---
> > sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
> 22607c22607
> < sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
> ---
> > sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
> 22618c22618
> < sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
> ---
> > sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
> 22624c22624
> < sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
> ---
> > sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
> ------
>
> Is there any better way for us to fix this, or is anything else needed?
Well, I believe your modification won't work. I just tried it with ImageMagick 6.3.8 and it failed. Try to rotate your picture four times, and
it should be back to the old position. When I use "-comment" instead "-set comment" on a PNG file, this did not work. From the man page it
tells me:
Version: ImageMagick 6.3.8 01/25/08 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org
Copyright: Copyright (C) 1999-2008 ImageMagick Studio LLC
Usage: convert [options ...] file [ [options ...] file ...] [options ...] file
Image Settings:
...
-comment string annotate image with comment
...
Image Operators:
...
-set property value set an image property
...
So indeed "-comment" and "-set comment" are two different things. I'm afraid you have to upgrade your ImageMagick package in order to make
this work. |
66175
|
Tue Jan 27 09:03:22 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.5-2168 | Re: more fun with SMTP and authentication.... | > For authentication via the Windows IIS I have "basic authentication" with no TLS encryption required - I'm
> not sure if that meets the provider's "SMTP authentication" requirement. When I was using the previous version
> of ELOG (sorry, I did not note the version number) the username was encrypted along with the password. With
> the 2168 build, the password is still encrypted but the usernamer is not; should the password be in "plain
> text" as well?
I changed only the screen output. The username is printed not not encrypted, to be able to check it by eye. The
username sent over the network is and was always encrypted.
The only clue I have is to compare the network traffic you get with an email client (outlook, thunderbird ??)
with the network traffic you get from elogd. To monitor the traffic, I use normally WireShark (formerly Ethereal,
www.wireshark.org). You have to filter for "tcp.port == 25" which is SMTP, then capture your traffic, right-
click on it and select "Follow TCP stream". The result you see in the attachment. The strings produced by elogd
are pink, the strings from the SMTP server are blue. In my case I don't have authentication (our SMTP server does
not support this). In you case, you have to compare the traffic from a functioning email client with elogd. |
66174
|
Tue Jan 27 08:06:54 2009 |
| Robert-Jan Schrijvers | Robert-Jan.Schrijvers@isoft.nl | Question | Windows | V2.6.3 | Re: Default value radio button |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Robert-Jan Schrijvers wrote: |
Is it possible to attach a default value for a radio button when submitting a new form/record, for example:
I now have an item "Confirmed" Yes/No, and I want the "no" option to be selected by default when a new form/record is created.
Does anyone know how to arrange this?
Thanks in advance!
|
You need something along these lines:
Attributes = ..., Confirmed
Options Confirmed = boolean
Preset Confirmed = 1
|
Good Morning Stefan,
This was very helpful, it works as aspected! Thank you :-)
With regards, Robert-Jan. |
66173
|
Mon Jan 26 22:01:07 2009 |
| Devin Bougie | dab66@cornell.edu | Bug fix | Linux | 2.7.5 | convert: unrecognized option '-set' | Hello,
We are now running elog-2.7.5 in a Scientific Linux 4 (RHEL4) system, which uses ImageMagick 6.0.7.1. After uploading an image, the image
manipulation buttons don't work and complain:
convert: unrecognized option '-set'
We are using an RPM built from source, and it looks like I should be able to just change "-set comment ..." to "-comment" as in:
------
[dab66@lnx100 tmp]% diff elogd.c elogd.c.new
22601c22601
< sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
---
> sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
22607c22607
< sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
---
> sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
22618c22618
< sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
---
> sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
22624c22624
< sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
---
> sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
------
Is there any better way for us to fix this, or is anything else needed?
Thanks,
Devin |
66172
|
Mon Jan 26 19:48:42 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.4 | Re: restrict a field to upper or lower case |
lisa giaime wrote: |
Is it possiblet to restrict a field so that when a new record is added, whatever the user types is automatically converted to lower case?
|
No, this is not possible. |
66171
|
Mon Jan 26 19:09:01 2009 |
| lisa giaime | lgiaime@cct.lsu.edu | Question | Linux | 2.7.4 | restrict a field to upper or lower case | Is it possiblet to restrict a field so that when a new record is added, whatever the user types is automatically converted to lower case?
Thanks! |
66170
|
Mon Jan 26 18:52:56 2009 |
| Topher Congdon | topher@congdongroup.com | Question | Windows | 2.7.5-2168 | more fun with SMTP and authentication.... | Great software.
Okay, so I've done my reading through the forum and got a couple of nuggets along the way but I am still unable
to get the e-mail function to work. I am using Windows IIS to make an SMTP virtual server to shimmy around the
IT firewall. That appears to work as I can see the response from the external SMTP server while running elogd
with the -v flag. The elogd -v details are below:
Email from xxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.com to xxxxxx.XXXXXXX@XXXXX.com,XXXXX.XXXXX X@XXXXX.com, SMTP host
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXXX.XXXXX.com:
220 smtp.xxxxx.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 6.0.2600.2180 ready at Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:56:35 -0500
EHLO xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxxxx.com
250-smtp.xxxxx.com Hello [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
250-AUTH=LOGIN
250-AUTH LOGIN
250-SIZE 2097152
250-PIPELINING
250-DSN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-8bitmime 250-BINARYMIME
250-CHUNKING 250-VRFY
250 OK AUTH LOGIN
Username:
xxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.com
Password: cm9jaGVsb2dib29r
535 5.7.3 Authentication unsuccessful
==== Return ================================
From the SMTP server response it is not logging in, but I don't know why. I can log in to the webmail app with
the username/password provided to ELOG, but it doesn't appear to work through ELOG. The SMTP provider includes
the following info to setup e-mail accounts via SMTP: "Please note: To send e-mail using the SMTP-Server,
activate SMTP Authentication. Please do not use the Secure Password Authentication (SPA) option. Optionally,
port 587 can also be used in addition to the default port (25) RFC 2476."
For authentication via the Windows IIS I have "basic authentication" with no TLS encryption required - I'm not
sure if that meets the provider's "SMTP authentication" requirement. When I was using the previous version of
ELOG (sorry, I did not note the version number) the username was encrypted along with the password. With the
2168 build, the password is still encrypted but the usernamer is not; should the password be in "plain text" as
well?
I can provide you with a username/password for the SMTP provider I'm using if that will help. Please send me a
separate e-mail and I will reply with the information.
Thank you,
Topher Congdon |
|