attribute of type "datetime" sorted incorrectly, posted by Kees Bol on Wed Jul 27 16:46:44 2005 
|
In order to enter different logdates we created the attribute 'Logdate' as follows:
...
|
Re: attribute of type "datetime" sorted incorrectly, posted by Kees Bol on Thu Jul 28 09:46:40 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kees Bol"]What goes wrong here?[/quote]
The wrong sorting is a mystery to me. I redid what you have, and entered exactly the same entries, and got following:
|
|
"full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Mon Aug 1 11:58:43 2005
|
Hi,
I have the strange problem that when changing to "full"-diplaymode the output looks the same as with "summary", only the color is different. The texts
don't appear.
|
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Tue Aug 2 10:25:32 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kees Bol"]I have the strange problem that when changing to "full"-diplaymode the output looks the same as with "summary", only
the color is different. The texts don't appear.
Any idea what can cause this behaviour?[/quote]
|
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Fri Aug 5 10:00:00 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kees Bol"]I thougt when choosing the full-view the text would appear along with the other attributes.[/quote]
That's how it is supposed to be. I tried your config file, added three entries, and got the behaviour documented in the attached images. To me everything |
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Fri Aug 5 10:51:27 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kees Bol"]I thougt when choosing the full-view the text would appear along with the other attributes.[/quote]
That's how it is supposed to be. I tried your config file, added three entries, and got the behaviour documented in the attached images. To me everything |
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Fri Aug 5 14:30:52 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kees Bol"]Stefan, I installed V2.6.0-beta3 and there is a (unwanted) difference. The Text field now appears in the summary-view
despite the config specifies:
|
|
Re: elogd dies after receiving second SIGHUP, posted by Paul T. Keener on Wed Jun 3 19:53:13 2009
|
> > elogd continues to run after a SIGHUP. If a second SIGHUP is received the daemon terminates.
> > This was observed on Solaris 10 (SPARC).
> > The documentation states that elogd should re-read configuration after receiving SIGHUP.
|