Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 483 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
IDdown Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  65945   Fri Aug 8 14:20:27 2008 Reply Yoshio ImaiQuestionAll2.7.4xRe: 2 questions :: different colors in list view based on "type" + change verbage of "type"

dale cooper wrote:
I'd love to display in the LIST VIEW (full, summary, or threaded views) different color's based on which TYPE was selected...

You can achieve this by using a "style" directive for this attribute. E.g. if your attribute is called "Shift" and entries with value "Day" should be green, value "Swing" should be blue, you should add
Style Shift Day = background-color:green
Style Shift Swing = background-color:blue
(and so on) to the config file.



Quote:
really I am just wondering if I can change the verbage that ELOG is using for the term TYPE? Is that doable?

As long as I am not missing a key point in your problem, you should be able to define the names of your logbook attributes simply with the "Attribute" directive. So, if you want the users to enter the shift and the name of the shift leader, you would put a line
Attributes = Shift, Shift leader
Options Shift = Day, Swing, ... <and so on>
Options Shift leader = Mike, Edward, John, ... <and so on>
and the logbook display should correctly show "Shift" and "Shift leader" in the header line of each entry ...
  65944   Fri Aug 8 00:44:26 2008 Question dale cooperagentdcooper@gmail.comQuestionAll2.7.4x2 questions :: different colors in list view based on "type" + change verbage of "type"

hello all,

#1 i love ELOG : excellent app! i would like to ask/present a question here -- I have a couple of TYPE's defined as;

       Options Type = Day Shift, Swing Shift, Night Shift
What I'd love to be able to do, is depending on what TYPE was selected during the creation of a NEW ENTRY in the ELOG "shift log" I'd love to display in the LIST VIEW (full, summary, or threaded views) different color's based on which TYPE was selected...

for example, if someone chose "Day Shift" that would be listed with a GREEN background, if someone chooses "Swing Shift" that gets a BLUE background, and so forth... I am wondering how one would go about implementing this?

second question... instead of listing the column named TYPE, can I just change it somewhere in the config to "SHIFT" so that in the list view, and even when in the NEW ENTRY form, I'd like it to show "Shift" instead of TYPE --- really I am just wondering if I can change the verbage that ELOG is using for the term TYPE? Is that doable?

 

Thanks for the app, I look forward to any reponses! I been editing the CSS, and once done think I'll add it to yr Config Examples, as I don't see many CSS themes there...

-peace-

  65943   Thu Aug 7 10:12:25 2008 Warning T. Ribbrockemgaron@gmx.netQuestionLinux2.7.4-2111Using the command line tool to edit

I intend to create a script that updates one of our elog logbooks based on mails it receives. I was hoping to be able to do this using the "elog" command line tool. Adding a new entry works fine, as does "replying" to an existing entry. The only thing I cannot get to work is editing an existing entry. All entries ahve several attributes and I intend not to use the "message" itself. I tried the following (on the machine this elogd is running on):

  1. Create a new entry with Attribute1 set to "value":

    elog -a 'Attribute1=value' -x -h localhost -l 'LOGBOOK' -p 8080 -u USER PASSWD

    This works - the entry gets created and is displayed properly.
    NOTE: I found that this does not work if LOGBOOK has any spaces in it - I would get error messages where the logbook was not found.
     
  2. Edit this entry to set a second attribute:

    elog -e 1 -a 'Attribute2=something' -x -h localhost -l 'LOGBOOK' -p 8080 -u USER PASSWD

    The result was: Error transmitting message. Running the same command with -v gives me a whole bunch of text with at the end this message (I've stripped the HTML): "This entry has in meantime been modified by someone else. Submitting it now would overwrite the other modification and is therefore prohibited." However, I know for certain that this entry is not being editied by anyone at that moment, so I'm wondering what I'm doing wrong here...

Also, I have a second, related question: Editing by the ID of the entry seems to be the only way of editing an entry - this makes it a bit difficult for me, as all entries already have a unique ID (which is defined as one of the attributes) that is non-numerical and not sequential. What is the easiest way to retrieve an ID from the command line (basically something like: "What ID has the entry with Attribute1==NAME?")? Is it possible at all? Otherwise, I would not be able to automatically edit the entries, as I don't know which is which... :-}

  65942   Mon Aug 4 09:00:43 2008 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.7.3Re: deadc0de

Niklas wrote:

my ELOG sometimes dies with "deadc0de", do I have too large ELOG config or logbook? Or is it simply a bug?

What can I do to solve this problem? "ulimit"? Or some trace output from elog?

 This seems an internal memory allocation problem. Can you reproduce the error? Can you reproduce it with the minimal configuration file coming with the distribution? If you know how to run a program inside the debugger, you can send me a stack trace when the problem occurs and I can check it.

  65941   Fri Aug 1 13:47:58 2008 Question Niklaselog@niklas.hoglund.pp.seQuestionLinux2.7.3deadc0de

Hi,

 

my ELOG sometimes dies with "deadc0de", do I have too large ELOG config or logbook? Or is it simply a bug?

What can I do to solve this problem? "ulimit"? Or some trace output from elog?

 

BR, Niklas

  65940   Thu Jul 31 17:22:23 2008 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionAll2.7.3-2058Re: html code in reply window

Tom Plancon wrote:

Hello,

Recently upgraded to 2.7.3 and I'm seeing html code filling up the reply window. Before I would just see [quote] and [/quote] around the original entry. Did I miss something in the upgrade? Thanks!

 Probably you did not install the FCKeditor. Just try a reply to this message, and you will see the many formatting icons on top of the page coming from that HTML editor. Without the editor, you will only see the plain HTML. You can switch back however to the old behavior by selecting the ELCode encoding. You can make this permanent with the "Default encoding =0" option.

  65939   Thu Jul 31 17:16:20 2008 Question Tom Plancontplancon@bkaarchs.comQuestionAll2.7.3-2058html code in reply window

Hello,

Recently upgraded to 2.7.3 and I'm seeing html code filling up the reply window. Before I would just see [quote] and [/quote] around the original entry. Did I miss something in the upgrade? Thanks!

  65938   Thu Jul 31 09:25:01 2008 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.7.4-2113Re: Exploit Browser Tabs to Make Anonymous Entries

Alan Stone wrote:

One of my shifters just managed to make an anonymous logbook entry even though the Author attribute is required.

It turns out that he had two tabs in his browser opened/logged into the Elog.  He logged out in one tab only.   Then he

did some other work on the desktop.  Then he returned to the browser to make a new logbook entry, finding the tab which

still showed the logged in menu, including the link for "New".  The Shifer is on day two, so he did not give any special

notice to seeing Anonymous in the Author field instead of his name.  He did point it out when I came in, and noted that

no warning was given about making an anonymous entry.

 

I tested the same scenario myself.  One cannot preview an anonymous entry (when Author field is a required attribute).

A warning is given.  However, one can submit the anonymous entry, and no warning is given.

 What configuration do you use? I tried to reproduce your problem with a "minimal" configuration like

[demo]
Attributes = Author, Subject
Preset Author = $long_name
Locked Attributes = Author

When I log out from the second browser tab and click on "New" on the first browser tab, I am shown the login page, not the new entry page. I guess your "menu commands" and "guest menu commands" allow non-logged in users to issue a "New" command. Try removing that.

Stefan

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6