ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
65929
|
Tue Jul 22 23:23:17 2008 |
| Kevin O'Sullivan | kosok@stanford.edu | Bug report | | 2.7.4 | Thumbnails not working |
I get the following error where thumbnails should go: Cannot create thumbnail, please check ImageMagick installation.
I restarted elog and check the log, it does in fact detect ImageMagick and it does have the most recent version. I'm running ubuntu 2.6.24-19-server. Is there something else I should be checking? |
65932
|
Wed Jul 23 15:14:58 2008 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | | 2.7.4 | Re: Thumbnails not working |
Kevin O'Sullivan wrote: |
I get the following error where thumbnails should go: Cannot create thumbnail, please check ImageMagick installation.
I restarted elog and check the log, it does in fact detect ImageMagick and it does have the most recent version. I'm running ubuntu 2.6.24-19-server. Is there something else I should be checking?
|
Try the following:
- Put logfile = elog.log into your elogd.cfg
- Upload an image to get the error
- Examine your elog.log file
You should get something like:
23-Jul-2008 15:10:38 [] Server listening on port 8080 ..
23-Jul-2008 15:10:52 [stefan@127.0.0.1] {demo} SHELL "convert "logbooks\demo\080723_151052_Capture.png" "logbooks\demo\080723_151052_Capture.png.png""
In your logfile. Now try the "convert" command manually under the same account elogd is running. Possible reasons for problems are:
- The "convert" command is not in your path or links to another program. Unfortunately ImageMagick chose a pretty standard name for this program
- The account under which elogd is running does not have write access to the logbook directory
- converts wants to call ghostscript for PDF conversion, but it is not installed
- ...
|
65974
|
Mon Sep 15 08:27:16 2008 |
| Samuel Morris | sam@tifr.res.in | Question | Linux | 2.7.4 | Re: Is there a way to send email notification without attachment |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Samuel Morris wrote: |
Adding a new attribute is working fine... Has it to do with the elog 2.6.3 version and also I downloaded from ubuntu's synaptic package.. Will the latest release of elog solves this problem???
|
I don't remember exactly when this feature was added, but it would well be that it was after 2.6.3, so upgrading would help.
|
Thanks Stefan. Now I have installed 2.7.4 and the problem is solved. but am having another problem. Elog is giving the same error message if the logbook has more than 5 subscribers for email notification. Upto 5 subscribers it works fine. I am sure its not postfix problem as I am able to send to more than 5 addresses in pine. |
65975
|
Mon Sep 15 08:51:57 2008 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.4 | Re: Is there a way to send email notification without attachment |
Samuel Morris wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Samuel Morris wrote: |
Adding a new attribute is working fine... Has it to do with the elog 2.6.3 version and also I downloaded from ubuntu's synaptic package.. Will the latest release of elog solves this problem???
|
I don't remember exactly when this feature was added, but it would well be that it was after 2.6.3, so upgrading would help.
|
Thanks Stefan. Now I have installed 2.7.4 and the problem is solved. but am having another problem. Elog is giving the same error message if the logbook has more than 5 subscribers for email notification. Upto 5 subscribers it works fine. I am sure its not postfix problem as I am able to send to more than 5 addresses in pine.
|
There is no limitation with 5 addresses in elog. What you can do however is to turn on debugging and watch the communication between elog and your SMTP server. To do so, start elogd interactively with the "-v" flag (='verbose'), send an message and watch the output. Maybe your SMTP server sends some error code to elogd. |
65976
|
Mon Sep 15 16:22:39 2008 |
| Wythe IT | carwile@avwtech.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.4 | Install on Server 2003: |
I am using Windows Server 2003 R2 Standard Edition. It is up-to-date and a full legal version installed from a geniune MS disk (to put that notion out the way). I host a variety of webpages from this server through IIS6.0.
I am having an issue after installation of the ELOG software. I grabbed the newest version from this website and ran the executable. It installed fine (or appeared to do so).
Upon starting the ELOG server I receive the following error:
elogd.exe - Unable to Locate Component
This application has failed to start because MSVCR71.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem.
The file in question is part of an ancient Visual C distributeable. This distributeable for my purposes no longer appears to be available (as I am on .net 3.5). I am unsure of downloading the older runtime libraries from sites that are not microsoft's. I am curious as to how I could go about making elog execute. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!
|
65977
|
Mon Sep 15 16:34:18 2008 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.4 | Re: Install on Server 2003: |
Wythe IT wrote: |
I am using Windows Server 2003 R2 Standard Edition. It is up-to-date and a full legal version installed from a geniune MS disk (to put that notion out the way). I host a variety of webpages from this server through IIS6.0.
I am having an issue after installation of the ELOG software. I grabbed the newest version from this website and ran the executable. It installed fine (or appeared to do so).
Upon starting the ELOG server I receive the following error:
elogd.exe - Unable to Locate Component
This application has failed to start because MSVCR71.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem.
The file in question is part of an ancient Visual C distributeable. This distributeable for my purposes no longer appears to be available (as I am on .net 3.5). I am unsure of downloading the older runtime libraries from sites that are not microsoft's. I am curious as to how I could go about making elog execute. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!
|
I didn't realize that MSCVR71.dll is kind of outphased. I will add it to future distributions. For the moment, you can download it from the elog server directly. |
65978
|
Mon Sep 15 18:49:33 2008 |
| Wythe IT | carwile@avwtech.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.4 | Re: Install on Server 2003: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Wythe IT wrote: |
I am using Windows Server 2003 R2 Standard Edition. It is up-to-date and a full legal version installed from a geniune MS disk (to put that notion out the way). I host a variety of webpages from this server through IIS6.0.
I am having an issue after installation of the ELOG software. I grabbed the newest version from this website and ran the executable. It installed fine (or appeared to do so).
Upon starting the ELOG server I receive the following error:
elogd.exe - Unable to Locate Component
This application has failed to start because MSVCR71.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem.
The file in question is part of an ancient Visual C distributeable. This distributeable for my purposes no longer appears to be available (as I am on .net 3.5). I am unsure of downloading the older runtime libraries from sites that are not microsoft's. I am curious as to how I could go about making elog execute. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!
|
I didn't realize that MSCVR71.dll is kind of outphased. I will add it to future distributions. For the moment, you can download it from the elog server directly.
|
Thank ya much. Worked perfectly. For others with this issue, download that linked file to your c:\windows\system32\ folder. |
65982
|
Mon Sep 22 16:46:32 2008 |
| Paul O'Shaughnessy | paul_o'shaughnessy@inmarsat.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.4 | Potential bug with the Quick filter |
I have a muliple entry field, which is defined by MOptions, which allows you to make multiple selections into one field.
My problem is that when I try to select this option from the Quick filter menu option, it brings back no entries.
When I use the search option this works fine. Any ideas on where I go from here?
Thanks,
Paul |