Re: Email notification question, posted by Kevin McCarty on Wed May 10 16:55:28 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kevin McCarty"]Hello,
I've just set up an ELog server for my research group. (Running on Debian, package version 2.6.1+r1642-1)
|
Is there (planned) support for <A NAME> and <HR /> in ELCODE?, posted by Kevin McCarty on Thu Apr 26 16:43:45 2007
|
Hello,
I am wondering if there is any support (or if not, if it is planned) for inserting HTML <a name> and <hr /> tags via ELCODE. This would be useful for |
|
Re: Is there (planned) support for <A NAME> and <HR /> in ELCODE?, posted by Kevin McCarty on Fri Apr 27 08:56:10 2007
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kevin McCarty"]I am wondering if there is any support (or if not, if it is planned) for inserting HTML <a name> and <hr />
tags via ELCODE.[/quote]
|
Increase attachment file size for elog command line client, posted by Kevin Ellwood on Fri Sep 27 19:17:58 2002
|
Hi,
I am having trouble modifying the elog client to allow larger attachment. I
|
|
"Number Attachments =" not being read after upgrade, posted by Kevin Ellwood on Wed May 7 16:54:26 2003
|
Hello
I have upgraded elog from version 2.2.4 to 2.3.6 and then entry "Number
|
|
Re: , posted by Kevin Ellwood on Wed May 7 17:27:51 2003
|
> > I have upgraded elog from version 2.2.4 to 2.3.6 and then entry "Number
> > Attachments =" is not being read. Looking at the changelog, I found that
> > "Number Attachments" has been removed in favor of "enable attachments". I
|
elogd dies after receiving second SIGHUP, posted by Kester Habermann on Tue Nov 11 16:45:04 2008
|
elogd continues to run after a SIGHUP. If a second SIGHUP is received the daemon terminates.
This was observed on Solaris 10 (SPARC).
The documentation states that elogd should re-read configuration after receiving SIGHUP. |
SEGV after upgrade from 2.7.8 to 2.9.0, posted by Kester Habermann on Mon Aug 15 11:36:02 2011 
|
Hello,
We've been using ELOG 2.6.5 to 2.7.8 for 4 years without any major problems.
Recently we upgraded to version 2.9.0 and since we've had the daemon frequently crash with SEGV. |