ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
84
|
Wed Jul 24 17:29:00 2002 |
| Christian Korschan | Christian.Korschan@CTBTO.ORG | Bug report | | | Re: Compiling elog 2.0.4 on Solaris |
> > Comiling elogd 2.0.4 under Solaris obviously fails with
> >
> > gcc -o elog elog.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > gcc -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > elogd.c: In function `ss_file_find':
> > elogd.c:1372: `alphasort' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > elogd.c:1372: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > elogd.c:1372: for each function it appears in.)
> > make: *** [elogd] Error 1
> >
> > because alphasort is an ucb'ism which does not exist under SYSV
> >
> > ... not very portable :-(
>
> I was not aware of this. Actually, I don't need 'alphasort' so I removed it
> from the source. The update is at
>
> http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/elogd.c
>
> Please give it a try.
ok - i just continued with 2.0.5, but apparently it still has an UCB'ism
(scandir) that does not work under SYSV:
$ make
gcc -g -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
scandir /tmp/ccy0Z3iV.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to elogd
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [elogd] Error 1
$ egrep scandir elogd.c
n = scandir(path, &namelist, NULL, NULL);
$ |
86
|
Fri Jul 26 10:47:21 2002 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug fix | | | Re: elogd.cfg cannot be saved |
> In the newest version of eLog, I was having trouble saving the
> configurations once I change them through the web interface.
I found a problem in the elogd.c code, which might cause that proplem
sometimes. The fix is available from
http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/elogd.c
If you need a windows executable, please let me know.
> I can change
> them and save them fine if I do it in notepad; but that way you have to
> restart the elogd server.
That should not be necessary, since elogd reads in the configuration file at
each access, so it can be modified externally without problem (although the
internal configuration should be the preferred way...)
> Also I was wondering if you were going to add
> any of the wish list items on version 2.0.6 (Conditional attributes seems
> to have the most votes and would be an extremely helpful feature!! :-).
I will have some spare time towards the end of August, so I hope to work on
these requests next month. |
88
|
Tue Jul 30 17:54:53 2002 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Comment | | | Re: Scroll box for attributes |
> Hello,
> If you have the text box turned off so you only enter attributes, is it
> possible to have a couple of attributes that have small scroll through text
> boxs of a couple of lines rather than just one line? Like not as big as
> the regular text box but something small to be able to post a couple of
> lines in and if it gets bigger then you scroll down. For instance if you
> are posting a problem and a solution just have one small text box for the
> problem and one for the solution.
Having multi-line attributes would be pretty difficult since it would break
the way the database works (one attribute at a line). So for now, you have to
use the text box and the reply functionality to deal with problems and fixes
(like for this entry). |
89
|
Sat Aug 3 17:35:39 2002 |
| Joe Nall | joe.nall@inet.com | Request | | | Re: Compiling elog 2.0.4 on Solaris |
> > > Comiling elogd 2.0.4 under Solaris obviously fails with
> > >
> > > gcc -o elog elog.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > > gcc -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > > elogd.c: In function `ss_file_find':
> > > elogd.c:1372: `alphasort' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > elogd.c:1372: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > > elogd.c:1372: for each function it appears in.)
> > > make: *** [elogd] Error 1
> > >
> > > because alphasort is an ucb'ism which does not exist under SYSV
> > >
> > > ... not very portable :-(
> >
> > I was not aware of this. Actually, I don't need 'alphasort' so I removed
it
> > from the source. The update is at
> >
> > http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/elogd.c
> >
> > Please give it a try.
>
> ok - i just continued with 2.0.5, but apparently it still has an UCB'ism
> (scandir) that does not work under SYSV:
>
> $ make
> gcc -g -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
> Undefined first referenced
> symbol in file
> scandir /tmp/ccy0Z3iV.o
> ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to elogd
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make: *** [elogd] Error 1
> $ egrep scandir elogd.c
> n = scandir(path, &namelist, NULL, NULL);
> $
I am having the same experience with ELOG 2.0.5 and Solaris 8. Any work
around woud be appreciated. |
91
|
Tue Aug 6 16:14:42 2002 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | | | Re: Compiling elog 2.0.4 on Solaris |
> > > > Comiling elogd 2.0.4 under Solaris obviously fails with
> > > >
> > > > gcc -o elog elog.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > > > gcc -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > > > elogd.c: In function `ss_file_find':
> > > > elogd.c:1372: `alphasort' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > > elogd.c:1372: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > > > elogd.c:1372: for each function it appears in.)
> > > > make: *** [elogd] Error 1
> > > >
> > > > because alphasort is an ucb'ism which does not exist under SYSV
> > > >
> > > > ... not very portable :-(
> > >
> > > I was not aware of this. Actually, I don't need 'alphasort' so I
removed
> it
> > > from the source. The update is at
> > >
> > > http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/elogd.c
> > >
> > > Please give it a try.
> >
> > ok - i just continued with 2.0.5, but apparently it still has an UCB'ism
> > (scandir) that does not work under SYSV:
> >
> > $ make
> > gcc -g -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > Undefined first referenced
> > symbol in file
> > scandir /tmp/ccy0Z3iV.o
> > ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to elogd
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make: *** [elogd] Error 1
> > $ egrep scandir elogd.c
> > n = scandir(path, &namelist, NULL, NULL);
> > $
> I am having the same experience with ELOG 2.0.5 and Solaris 8. Any work
> around woud be appreciated.
I removed also scandir() in the current version (right now only in CVS). The
official release of 2.1.0 is planned for next week. |
93
|
Wed Aug 7 15:51:18 2002 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | | | Re: problem with required attributes |
> When an entry is submitted with an required attribute missing one gets to
> the resubmit page. When you the click your browsers back button all
> previously filled attribute field are blank.
>
> Is there a workaround to get the old text back?
>
> used versions:
> Elog 2.0.5
> Netscape 4.76
>
> Best regards,
>
> Stefan
This problem must be specific to NS 4.76, I don't have it on IE, NS 6, Mozilla
1, Opera etc. Maybe you should upgrade. Anybody else made this observation? |
95
|
Fri Aug 9 12:50:58 2002 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | | | Re: Edit an existing message overwrites attributes with preset values |
> Is there a possibility to prevent elog to overwrite attribute values when
> editing an old message? The old values are overwriten with the preset
> options for that attribute.
> But sometimes you will preserve attribute text and /or options from the old
> message.
The option "Fixed attributes = ..." will do the job. |
96
|
Fri Aug 9 13:04:58 2002 |
| Stefan Siegel | ssiegel@lucent.com | Info | | | Re: Edit an existing message overwrites attributes with preset values |
> > Is there a possibility to prevent elog to overwrite attribute values when
> > editing an old message? The old values are overwriten with the preset
> > options for that attribute.
> > But sometimes you will preserve attribute text and /or options from the
old
> > message.
>
> The option "Fixed attributes = ..." will do the job.
Ok, but is there a possibility to preserve the fields of the old message, but
still be able to edit it. This would be a nice feature in the case of an entry
with lots of attributes (set to something different then the preset values).
After submiting the message you realize : one option was wrong and now you
want to edit it without changing the other options again.
Is this possible?
Thank you and best regards,
Stefan |