Two different attributes with the same list, posted by deletoille on Wed Jan 17 09:20:17 2007 
|
In this picture of my project, All the attributes included in the red circle are the same except the names of the attribute “Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté”.
“Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté” have the same list.
The displayed list for the both attributes is the multiple conditions result coming from the choice of “groupe incriminé or impacté, sous ensemble, selection, and localisation”.
So if I have to program the list twice, it will be twice bigger.
Do I need to program the same list twice for the two attributes or is there a simple command to say that the two precedent attributes are equal?
Thanks in advance
Xavier Deletoille |
Re: Two different attributes with the same list, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jan 17 12:49:25 2007
|
| deletoille wrote: | In this picture of my project, All the attributes included in the red circle are the same except the names of the attribute “Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté”.
“Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté” have the same list.
The displayed list for the both attributes is the multiple conditions result coming from the choice of “groupe incriminé or impacté, sous ensemble, selection, and localisation”.
So if I have to program the list twice, it will be twice bigger.
Do I need to program the same list twice for the two attributes or is there a simple command to say that the two precedent attributes are equal?
|
I don't understand your problem. The picture you attached, was this some ELOG output (it looks very different than the usual one...)? Do mean you have two attributes with the same "Options <attribute> = ...,..,.." list? With "multiple conditions" you mean that you do a search in ELOG with a condition one one attribute, but in the filter list both attributes having the same option list are shown. Is this correct? What section of the configuration file are you talking about?
Best regards
Stefan |
|
Re: Two different attributes with the same list, posted by deletoille on Wed Jan 17 13:27:46 2007
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| deletoille wrote: | In this picture of my project, All the attributes included in the red circle are the same except the names of the attribute “Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté”.
“Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté” have the same list.
The displayed list for the both attributes is the multiple conditions result coming from the choice of “groupe incriminé or impacté, sous ensemble, selection, and localisation”.
So if I have to program the list twice, it will be twice bigger.
Do I need to program the same list twice for the two attributes or is there a simple command to say that the two precedent attributes are equal?
|
I don't understand your problem. The picture you attached, was this some ELOG output (it looks very different than the usual one...)? Do mean you have two attributes with the same "Options <attribute> = ...,..,.." list? With "multiple conditions" you mean that you do a search in ELOG with a condition one one attribute, but in the filter list both attributes having the same option list are shown. Is this correct? What section of the configuration file are you talking about?
Best regards
Stefan |
I'm soory, i'm very poor in english.
Here is a very small part of my program:
{AE&Anneau&Panne} Moptions Défaut = Flowmeter or Door meter, Communication, Earth, IAC, Driver, Temp. Ambiant, Phase, Cooling Water, Overvoltage, OverCurrent, Sample Card, Ripple, EEPROM, Autres
{AE&Anneau&Gr} Moptions Equipement incriminé = Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q10, QT, S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, Alim correcteurs H., Alim correcteurs V., alim. Dipole, Alim Q., Alim S.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C01} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C02} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.2-CH, S8.2-QT, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.1-QT, S10.2-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C03} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.1-QT, S8.2-CH, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.2-CH, S10.2-QT, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C04} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C05} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C06} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.2-CH, S8.2-QT, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.1-QT, S10.2-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C07} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.1-QT ,S8.2-CH, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.2-CH, S10.2-QT, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C08} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C09} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C10} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.2-CH ,S8.2-QT, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.1-QT, S10.2-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C11} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.1-QT, S8.2-CH, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.2-CH, S10.2-QT, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C12} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C13} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C14} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.2-CH, S8.2-QT, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.1-QT, S10.2-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C15} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.1-QT, S8.2-CH, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.2-CH, S10.2-QT, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C16} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
Do I have to program the list for "Equipement Impacté" or is there a simple command to say that "Equipement incrimé" and "equipement inpacté" have the same list?
Thanks in advance
Xavier Deletoille |
|
Re: Two different attributes with the same list, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jan 17 13:33:27 2007
|
| deletoille wrote: | | Do I have to program the list for "Equipement Impacté" or is there a simple command to say that "Equipement incrimé" and "equipement inpacté" have the same list? |
Ok, now I understand. No, there is no simple way, you have to specify both lists explicitly. But it's just a copy and paste in your editor 
By the way, have you discovered Google Translate? Like http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmidas.psi.ch%2Felogs%2FForum%2F2115&langpair=en%7Cfr
Not perfect, but readable. I know a Korean and a Japanese guy who do not speak English but talk to each other via email with this automatic translation tool Korean->English->Japanese and back. Amazing. |
Synchronization using https, posted by Alexandre Lindote on Thu Jan 18 16:29:43 2007
|
Hi,
I have an elog server running on a linux desktop machine inside our institutional firewall. It can be accessed from inside the firewall directly using http, but users from outside have to use https, with apache (and its ssl module) controlling the access.
I also set up another server on my laptop, just for backup purposes, and synchronized it inside the firewall (using a direct http connection). No problems there!
Now we want to have several servers set up (in different institutions), and have them synchronized automatically. For this I installed elog on a mac server (in another institution, so outside our firewall), also accessible only through https (again using apache).
I configured all the required mirror settings, but always get an error: "Remote server is not an ELOG server".
I've tried changing the status of the 2 machines (server-client), but get the same error...
I also tried different approaches for the Mirror server parameter, like
https://the.remote.server
https://the.remote.server:443
http://the.remote.server:443
but no luck...
Running elog with the -D flag off issued this message:
| Quote: | HTTP/1.1 401 Authorization Required
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:22:10 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Darwin) DAV/1.0.3 mod_ssl/2.8.24 OpenSSL/0.9.7l
WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="zeplin2"
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Authorization Required
This server could not verify that you
are authorized to access the document
requested. Either you supplied the wrong
credentials (e.g., bad password), or your
browser doesn't understand how to supply
the credentials required.
Apache/1.3.33 Server at shalott.pp.rl.ac.uk Port 80
|
The servers have user level passwords, and I'm mirroring with Mirror user parameter set to the administrator...
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance
Alex |
|
Re: Synchronization using https, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 18 20:19:22 2007
|
| Alexandre Lindote wrote: | | Now we want to have several servers set up (in different institutions), and have them synchronized automatically. |
Synchronization works such that the "client" elogd (the one on which the synchronization is started) "emulates" a browser and accesses the other elogd server. Since SSL is not built into elogd, it can only use the http protocol, not https. If you want secure synchronization, the only chance you have is to make a SSH tunnel on which you run the http protocol for synchronization. |
|
Re: Synchronization using https, posted by Marcus Hauser on Tue Feb 13 15:11:18 2007
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Alexandre Lindote wrote: | | Now we want to have several servers set up (in different institutions), and have them synchronized automatically. |
Synchronization works such that the "client" elogd (the one on which the synchronization is started) "emulates" a browser and accesses the other elogd server. Since SSL is not built into elogd, it can only use the http protocol, not https. If you want secure synchronization, the only chance you have is to make a SSH tunnel on which you run the http protocol for synchronization. |
Would it be possible to use rsync to syncronise two elogd servers on different servers via secure synchronization on the file level?
E.g.
rsync -av -e ssh /var/lib/elog/logbooks/ elog.remote.de:/var/lib/elog/logbooks/ |
|
Re: Synchronization using https, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 13 15:36:08 2007
|
| Marcus Hauser wrote: | Would it be possible to use rsync to syncronise two elogd servers on different servers via secure synchronization on the file level?
E.g.
rsync -av -e ssh /var/lib/elog/logbooks/ elog.remote.de:/var/lib/elog/logbooks/ |
Do do this, you have to do the following:
- Stop both elogd servers on each side
- Do the rsync
- Restart the elogd servers
This is necessary because an elogd server does not rescan the database files unless it's restarted. Note that you only can synchronize on a day level. Like if in a single day new entries are made on both sides, you have a conflict. This is not the case if you do the internal elogd synchronization, because this works on an entry level (actually that was the reason why this internal synchronization was invented). So new entries on both sides which were made as the same day will be merged intelligently. |
|