Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 560 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show all entries    6460 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 559, 560, 561 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Versiondown Subject
  1870   Wed Jul 5 00:18:29 2006 Reply Arno Teunissearno.teunisse@hetnet.nlBug reportWindows2.6.1-6Re: Corrupt page link

Ulrich Trüssel wrote:
If a loggbook contains more than one page of entries, above and under the list are links for changing the page by number (or privous / last and all) conatining links looking like "http://localhost:8080/logbook/page2?mode=mode". This is the correct link and will work until Version 2.6.1-5!

In Version 2.6.1-6 the link is corrupted and look always like "http://localhost:8080/logbook/pag"


In this version, the above is true. It also has corrupted entries when clicking : Full | Summary | Threaded.

On MSExplorer and Firefox only a part of the link is shown in the left-down corner of the browser :
http://localhost:8080/?mo

No matter what button you click.

It should be : http://localhost:8080/?mode=full
http://localhost:8080/?mode=Summary
http://localhost:8080/?mode=Attachments

I'v tested is with the default elogd.cfg file which comes with the installation.

Something is going wrong here.

When importing a csv text file the above is introduced also.

Just installed the previous version :
====================================
[C:\Program Files\ELOG]elogd -c elogd.cfg
elogd 2.6.1 built May 24 2006, 08:59:09 revision 1688
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...

And the problem is gone. !!!!

problem is in version :
==========================
[C:\Program Files\ELOG1]elogd -c elogd.cfg
elogd 2.6.1 built Jun 13 2006, 08:43:21 revision 1691
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...

I love elog , for it's simplicity,
but will not upgrade to the lastest release untill this is solved.
  1871   Wed Jul 5 12:51:25 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportWindows2.6.1-6Re: Corrupt page link

Arno Teunisse wrote:
Just installed the previous version :
====================================
[C:\Program Files\ELOG]elogd -c elogd.cfg
elogd 2.6.1 built May 24 2006, 08:59:09 revision 1688
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...

And the problem is gone. !!!!

problem is in version :
==========================
[C:\Program Files\ELOG1]elogd -c elogd.cfg
elogd 2.6.1 built Jun 13 2006, 08:43:21 revision 1691
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...


Thanks for your detailed information. The hint with the two different revisions heally helped. I fixed that in revision 1695, and made an intermediate release 2.6.1-7. This will fix the problem. Can you please check that this is working?
  1921   Sun Sep 3 23:16:31 2006 Reply Arno Teunissearno.teunisse@hetnet.nlBug reportWindows2.6.1-6Re: Corrupt page link

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Arno Teunisse wrote:
Just installed the previous version :
====================================
[C:\Program Files\ELOG]elogd -c elogd.cfg
elogd 2.6.1 built May 24 2006, 08:59:09 revision 1688
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...

And the problem is gone. !!!!

problem is in version :
==========================
[C:\Program Files\ELOG1]elogd -c elogd.cfg
elogd 2.6.1 built Jun 13 2006, 08:43:21 revision 1691
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...


Thanks for your detailed information. The hint with the two different revisions heally helped. I fixed that in revision 1695, and made an intermediate release 2.6.1-7. This will fix the problem. Can you please check that this is working?


Sorry for my ( very ) late answer , But yes the problem is GONE after installing the new release? Thanks.
  1796   Wed Apr 5 20:25:42 2006 Question Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionAll2.6.1-1684Triggering $shell question
Should this work? rev1684 now allows $shell to pass attribute contents to the shell command and whenever a new entry is submitted or when one Edits/Replys the Subst is triggered, but I would like to be able to trigger this whenever a new value in the options pulldown is selected (assume Risk2 and Risk3 are identical to Risk1). Being able to trigger a regular Preset works fine (like {1} preset Date = $date ) but I would like to trigger the Subst. Maybe a better question, what actions (Subst, Preset, Change, Execute, etc.) I've tried Subst and Preset but not much luck.

##################################################
# Define Risk1
#
Options Risk1 = 10{30}, 20{31}, 30{32}, 40{33}, 50{34}, 60{35}, 70{36}, 80{37}, 90{38}, 100{39} 
{30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39} Subst TotalRisk = $shell(gawk 'BEGIN{ print $Risk1 + $Risk2 + $Risk3 }' )
  1797   Wed Apr 5 22:48:49 2006 Reply Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionAll2.6.1-1684Re: Triggering Re: Triggering $shell question

Steve Jones wrote:
Should this work? rev1684 now allows $shell to pass attribute contents to the shell command and whenever a new entry is submitted or when one Edits/Replys the Subst is triggered, but I would like to be able to trigger this whenever a new value in the options pulldown is selected (assume Risk2 and Risk3 are identical to Risk1). Being able to trigger a regular Preset works fine (like {1} preset Date = $date ) but I would like to trigger the Subst. Maybe a better question, what actions (Subst, Preset, Change, Execute, etc.) I've tried Subst and Preset but not much luck.

##################################################
# Define Risk1
#
Options Risk1 = 10{30}, 20{31}, 30{32}, 40{33}, 50{34}, 60{35}, 70{36}, 80{37}, 90{38}, 100{39} 
{30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39} Subst TotalRisk = $shell(gawk 'BEGIN{ print $Risk1 + $Risk2 + $Risk3 }' )


Hmm, maybe I can answer my own question - until the form is saved with the new value selected the old values still exist. I guess what I really need is to trigger the $shell anytime a save happens or logentry is pulled in for edit. I think I do the latter with Subst on edit/Subst on Reply, but how on any save?

. . . Except that when I change an options field that has a dependencies, doesn't the javascript force a server-side revalidation?
  1802   Mon Apr 10 05:34:40 2006 Question Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comRequestAll2.6.1-1684TIMEZONE modifier?
We host eLog for a number of global sites. Our logbooks use datetime attributes but the timezones are wrong attributes that are either preset (like when a logentry is created) or if we fill in an attribute from an action (like when a logentry is closed). Any possibility of adding a timezone designator to FORMAT or does one already exist?

Thanks!
  1804   Mon Apr 10 20:28:37 2006 Entry Alan Stonealstone@fnal.govQuestionLinux2.6.1-1684How can I configure to prevent empty entries?
I have accidentally created a couple of entries recently. It is pretty easy. I
fill in the header, type in a Subject, and then hit Enter, instead of TAB.
I have turned off the edit option intentionally.

I want to avoid this in the future. Is there a configuration option which would
confirm that the user before submitting an entry without a Body? I know I can require
attributes like Author and Subject. I am not sure I want to require a Body, in case
someone submits an entry with just an attachment (and a Subject).

Thanks, Alan
  1808   Fri Apr 14 16:30:56 2006 Question Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionAll2.6.1-1684Any way to move Replies from one logentry to another?
Is there anyway to reattach a reply within a logbook from one logentry to another? I guess it would be "re-associate"?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 559, 560, 561 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6