| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1994
|
Mon Oct 16 17:32:58 2006 |
 | Dimitrios Tsirigkas | dimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.ch | Question | | | Re: Problem with large entry size |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | I improved the performance by some factor in SVN revision 1733. Can you give it a try and report your speed improvement? Depending on the result, I can probably do even a bit better with some more effort.
- Stefan |
Dear Stefan,
Thank you for your quick reply. I will install the new version and I will let you know as soon soon as possible.
Best,
Dimitris |
|
1993
|
Mon Oct 16 17:18:58 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Problem with large entry size |
I improved the performance by some factor in SVN revision 1733. Can you give it a try and report your speed improvement? Depending on the result, I can probably do even a bit better with some more effort.
- Stefan |
|
1992
|
Mon Oct 16 16:53:43 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Problem with large entry size |
| Dimitrios Tsirigkas wrote: | | I have posted an entry of approximately a thousand lines (ten thousand words). Posting it took some time, which is logical to a certain degree. However, whenever a user asks for "Full" view of the logbook, the page takes around two minutes to load and the CPU usage on the elog server goes to beyond 90% for all this time. Is this to be expected for an entry of that size or is there something going wrong here? |
The problem lies in the ELCode parsing. When you post an entry in ELCode form, the elogd server has to parse every word to see if it's any of the ELcode tags. This is right now implemented in a kind of poor way, such that it takes very long for long entries. I will work to optimize that. In the meantime, it will help if you post such long entries just in "plain" form.
- Stefan |
|
1991
|
Mon Oct 16 16:20:06 2006 |
 | Dimitrios Tsirigkas | dimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.ch | Question | | | Problem with large entry size |
Hi Stefan,
I have posted an entry of approximately a thousand lines (ten thousand words). Posting it took some time, which is logical to a certain degree. However, whenever a user asks for "Full" view of the logbook, the page takes around two minutes to load and the CPU usage on the elog server goes to beyond 90% for all this time. Is this to be expected for an entry of that size or is there something going wrong here?
Thanks,
Dimitris |
|
1990
|
Mon Oct 16 08:57:07 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Error Sending Email |
| Ibrahim Genc wrote: | | There is a free e-mail service at mail.softhome.net. It provides smtp and pop3 services. You can use this for testing if you want. |
I tried but I was unable to obtain a free account. Furthermore, the problem is probably related to your SMTP server's authentication method. There are many methods and ELOG only supports a subset. So I would have to try with your specific SMTP server. So the only recommendation I can give you is to find an SMTP server without authentication. That one will certainly work with elog. |
|
1989
|
Sat Oct 14 10:01:17 2006 |
| Gregory M. Caughey | caugheygm@aol.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Gregory M. Caughey wrote: | | Hope this helps a little... |
Yepp it helped. I could reproduce your problem and fix it. Can you try elog262-4.exe (Revision 1729)? |
Hi Stefan!
Just installed elog-2.6.2-1729 and it's working perfectly. I haven't had enough time to test it thoroughly yet but will report any problems I might find. As always thanks for your excellent work, I appreciate it.
Regards, Greg |
|
1988
|
Fri Oct 13 23:17:05 2006 |
| Ibrahim Genc | ig004@hotmail.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Error Sending Email |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Ibrahim Genc wrote: | | I get error message after submitting a message |
Your verbose output seems to be only partial. I have modified the verbose output recently, so please update to a more recent version of elog. With 2.6.2-3 I get for example
Email from stefan.ritt@psi.ch to stefan.ritt@psi.ch, SMTP host xxx.psi.ch:
...
|
Now I installed 262-4 but no change. communication seems to be stopped at the same point.
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
This is of course without SMTP username. Our mail server does not support SMTP username, so I programmed this kind of "blindly".
|
There is a free e-mail service at mail.softhome.net. It provides smtp and pop3 services. You can use this for testing if you want.
Saluts.
--
ibrahim |
|
1987
|
Fri Oct 13 16:59:13 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box |
| Gregory M. Caughey wrote: | | Hope this helps a little... |
Yepp it helped. I could reproduce your problem and fix it. Can you try elog262-4.exe (Revision 1729)? |