| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1986
|
Thu Oct 12 17:42:37 2006 |
 | Ibrahim Genc | ig004@hotmail.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Error Sending Email |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Ibrahim Genc wrote: | | I get error message after submitting a message |
Your verbose output seems to be only partial. I have modified the verbose output recently, so please update to a more recent version of elog. With 2.6.2-3 I get for example
|
I downloaded the latest version just yesterday. I checked again now; it is version 2.6.2-3. I'll wait some time for release of new build of windows binaries. Mine differs from yours as a one build number only.
Thanks for prompt answer. |
|
1985
|
Thu Oct 12 16:34:07 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Error Sending Email |
| Ibrahim Genc wrote: | | I get error message after submitting a message |
Your verbose output seems to be only partial. I have modified the verbose output recently, so please update to a more recent version of elog. With 2.6.2-3 I get for example
Email from stefan.ritt@psi.ch to stefan.ritt@psi.ch, SMTP host xxx.psi.ch:
220 xxx.psi.ch xxxvs01 Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:25:17 +0200
HELO xxx.psi.ch
250 xxx.psi.ch Hello [129.129.xxx.xxx]
MAIL FROM: stefan.ritt@psi.ch
250 2.1.0 stefan.ritt@psi.ch....Sender OK
RCPT TO: <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
250 2.1.5 stefan.ritt@psi.ch
RCPT TO: <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
250 2.1.5 stefan.ritt@psi.ch
DATA
354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:25:17 +0200
To: "Stefan Ritt" <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
From: Stefan Ritt <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
User-Agent: Elog Version 2.6.2
Subject: Updated ELOG entry
X-Elog-URL: http://localhost:8080/demo/1
X-Elog-submit-type: web|elog
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
... here comes the complete email body ....
.
250 2.6.0 <xxx.psi.ch> Queued mail for delivery
QUIT
221 2.0.0 xxx.psi.ch Service closing transmission channel
==== Return ================================
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Server: ELOG HTTP 2.6.2-1724
Connection: Keep-Alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=60, max=10
Content-Length: 20
This is of course without SMTP username. Our mail server does not support SMTP username, so I programmed this kind of "blindly".
| Ibrahim Genc wrote: | | Another question is; Can I change the port number of the smtp server? Some servers use another port than 25. |
All server I met so far were running on port 25, so I hardcoded this in elogd.c. You can change it in the source code at line 2119:
bind_addr.sin_port = htons((short) 25);
If more people ask for this, I can make it a parameter. |
|
1984
|
Thu Oct 12 16:22:40 2006 |
 | Ibrahim Genc | ig004@hotmail.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Error Sending Email |
I've set up all e-mail configuration but I get error message after submitting a message
verbose output is as follows: every parameter I used works in outlook express.
Another question is; Can I change the port number of the smtp server? Some servers use another port than 25.
Thanks so much.
--
ibrahim
------------------------------------------------
Email ALL to genc@xxx.com.tr
timezone: -7200, offset: 10800
Email from genc@xxx.com.tr to genc@xxx.com.tr,genc@xxx.com.tr,, SMTP host
mail.xxx.com.tr:
220 mx-d.xxx.com ESMTP Postfix
EHLO neuron
250-mail-003.xxx.com
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 41943040
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5
250-AUTH=LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5
250 8BITMIME
==== Return ================================
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Server: ELOG HTTP 2.6.2-1722
Connection: Keep-Alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=60, max=10
Location: http://127.0.0.1:8080/PhD/4?error=Error+sending+Email+via+<i>"mail.xxx.com.tr"</i> |
|
1983
|
Wed Oct 11 19:37:10 2006 |
 | Gregory M. Caughey | caugheygm@aol.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Gregory M. Caughey wrote: | | 2.) However, email notifications will be sent under all circumstances regardless of which parameter selected. |
Thanks for reporting that problem. I just implemented Suppress email on edit and this could have had some side effect. I tried however to reproduce your problem and was not able to. Trying the "minimal" configuration file, the email notifications were suppressed if the check box was checked, or if Suppress default = 3. Can you check if it works with a minimal config file, and if yes, what option in your "full" config file causes this effect? |
OK, you're absolutely correct. When I run Elog-2.6.2-1722 with a minimal 'elogd.cfg' the "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" flag does appear to behave as expected. Taking your advice I went through my local 'elogd.cfg' evaluating items to see where the problem starts and I found a problem. In my local config file I use conditional attributes to modify the "category" and "type" fields (in the posting form) and here is what I'm finding wrong. For this example I have set "Suppress default = 3" and the following actions take place:
1.) Select "New" to begin a post and the form displays correctly with NO "[] Suppress Email notification" checkbox showing.
2.) When selecting "Category" an choosing an appropriate menu item the form is then redrawn and now there is a problem, the "[] Suppress Email notification" checkbox is displaying. The checkbox does work correctly but the behavior I'm expecting is for no checkbox to display during the composition of this posting. Am I misunderstanding the behavior of the "Suppress default = 3" flag?
3.) Each of the other flag parameters appear to work as expected as used in the above example.
I have attached screenshots that demonstrate this behavior as well as a snippet of the 'elogd.cfg' file.
Hope this helps a little...
Thanks, Greg |
| Attachment 1: Capture10-11-2006-5.05.21_AM.jpg
|
|
| Attachment 2: Capture10-11-2006-5.06.40_AM.jpg
|
|
| Attachment 3: Capture10-11-2006-5.09.34_AM.jpg
|
|
|
1982
|
Wed Oct 11 16:08:04 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: Turn off smileys? |
| Yoshio Imai wrote: | Other suggestion: What about going the other way round and making this \?) the smiley and this ?) the usual question in brackets? If there was a special sequence to announce the unusual case (i.e. the smiley), I think less people would complain about having unwanted conversions ... |
I thought also about that, but people who are use to bulletin boards or instant messaging have the common knowledge that a ;) gives a smiley, not a \;). While it would work with the smiley button, which could insert anything, the "other" half of the people who are used to the standard smileys would complain. So I hope that ?-) is acceptable by both sides. |
|
1981
|
Wed Oct 11 16:03:52 2006 |
| Yoshio Imai | | Question | Linux | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: Turn off smileys? |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | Put a \ in front of anything which is turned into a smiley, so ;) gets converted into  , but \;) does not get converted |
Other suggestion: What about going the other way round and making this \?) the smiley and this ?) the usual question in brackets? If there was a special sequence to announce the unusual case (i.e. the smiley), I think less people would complain about having unwanted conversions ... |
|
1980
|
Wed Oct 11 11:47:29 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box |
| Gregory M. Caughey wrote: | | 2.) However, email notifications will be sent under all circumstances regardless of which parameter selected. |
Thanks for reporting that problem. I just implemented Suppress email on edit and this could have had some side effect. I tried however to reproduce your problem and was not able to. Trying the "minimal" configuration file, the email notifications were suppressed if the check box was checked, or if Suppress default = 3. Can you check if it works with a minimal config file, and if yes, what option in your "full" config file causes this effect? |
|
1979
|
Wed Oct 11 11:37:03 2006 |
 | Gregory M. Caughey | caugheygm@aol.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box |
Hi Stefan!
Been running Elog-2.6.2-1714 successfully for a while and yesterday decided to download and experiment with the latest Elog-2.6.2-1722 build. I want to report a possible bug involving the "Suppress default" option when running build 2.6.2-1722 on a Windows XP laptop. I installed 2.6.2-1722 into a development folder and copied my current production 'elogd.cfg' file and other custom files to the development folder. Test postings produced the following results:
1.) The "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option causes the [] Suppress Email notification to display or not display as expected.
2.) However, email notifications will be sent under all circumstances regardless of which parameter selected.
3.) Downgrading to Elog-2.6.2-1714 produces the expected behavior.
I am running Windows XP with all current upgrades and security patches and Internet Explorer 7 - version: 7.0.5700.6
Regards, Greg |