Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 571 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
    icon2.gif   Re: Access to global configuration in v2.6.1, posted by Giorgio Croci Candiani on Tue Mar 14 17:11:10 2006 
> > or maybe browser cookies. 
> 
> That rings a bell. If you change user permissions (like password file/no password file/rename logbooks) you might be
> fooled by old cookies. Just delete all cookies in your browser and try again.

Hi,
here I am at it again. Since my first posts, I tried to install the latest version of elog out-of-the-box on one pair of
PCs from scratch (fresh elog install on new, just-installed PCs, OS WinXP Pro and Win2000), but with no results. No
trace of the global configuration menu or the buttons to reach it.
Neither taking a look at the code has helped, I could not figure out exactly where the button bar was generated.
Didn't anybody other point out a similar behaviour? Do you have any suggestion for any tests to carry out?
Thanks
GiorgioCC
    icon2.gif   Re: Access to global configuration in v2.6.1, posted by Giorgio Croci Candiani on Tue Aug 29 15:16:31 2006 
Hi,
after a long time, I thought I could try to investigate the code some further,
and maybe I found some hint.
The page where I expected the options to show was (probably) the one generated by this function:

void show_admin_page(LOGBOOK * lbs, char *top_group)

Inside, it, the buttons are generated by following code snippets:

(elogd.c:10443)
if (is_admin_user_global(getparam("unm"))) {
   sprintf(str, loc("Change %s"), "[global]");
   rsprintf("<input type=submit name=cmd value=\"%s\">\n", str);
}
(elogd.c:10461)
  if (is_admin_user("global", getparam("unm"))) {
     rsprintf("<input type=submit name=cmd value=\"%s\">\n", loc("Delete this logbook"));
     rsprintf("<input type=submit name=cmd value=\"%s\">\n", loc("Rename this logbook"));
     rsprintf("<input type=submit name=cmd value=\"%s\">\n", loc("Create new logbook"));
}

The functions called to validate the user are following:

(elogd.c:21298)
BOOL is_admin_user(char *logbook, char *user):
//...
   if (user == NULL)
      return FALSE;

(elogd.c:21324)

BOOL is_admin_user_global(char *user)
{
//...
   if (user == NULL)
      return FALSE;

Since I assume that I'm probably in the "userless" case (no users are defined in the configuration,
and no usernames are set when launching elog either), I would understand that this causes the options for
global config editing etc etc not to be shown on the admin page.

In my opinion (and given that my interpretation of the code flow isn't wrong), the "null"
user should be indeed considered admin, at least as long as no user management is defined whatsoever.
(If I got it right, if user==NULL, but a password file exists, user management is applied,
thus we're in the case of anonymous user which is correctly not admin).

Again, I might be wrong, but I would be curious to hear an opinion from you about this issue.
Thanks again for your attention.
GiorgioCC
icon5.gif   Changing of entries after expired time restriction by synchronisation, posted by Gino Guenzburger on Thu Aug 16 13:33:39 2018 

I'm working on setting up an elog as lab-journal in our group with the following set-up:

  • The elog is running on a server, with no back-end access for the users.
  • Multiple people will use it, all loging in with the same user-name and password.
  • The entries submitted to the log-book can only be edited for 24hours, as defined by the "Restrict edit time= 24" setting in the configuration file.

Now I encountered the following problem in my set-up: Entries that do not have attachments can be changed after these 24hours have passed, by the following set-up: If a user (in the current case me during testing) sets up a local elog on his computer and activates the synchronisation with the elog on the server, he can switch off the time-restriction for editing on his local elog, and if he synchronises the two log-books, the changed entry from the local elog will overwrite the original one from the server-elog.

Obviously this is not very desirable. Therefore I wanted to ask, whether anyone sees a possibility to prevent the editing of entries, which are older than the restricted edit time. A specific function or a change in the synchronisation behaviour would of course be the completest solution, but in my case the problem would also be solved if I could just prohibit the synchronisation. It is not needed, so no harm will be done if it is not possible.

 

    icon5.gif   Re: Find cannot find values with brackets, posted by Gino Guenzburger on Wed Feb 19 17:43:34 2020 

Hi Stefan

we are running elog

Stefan Ritt wrote:

I‘m happy to merge the PR after a quick test next week.

Stefan

Sebastian Schenk wrote:

For demonstration, I created https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Linux+Demo/8

The Find search for category aaa(bb) does not give results.
A quick filter corrects the value to aaa\(bb) and delivers results.

I made a simple fix and submitted it as PR to the bitbucket repository.

 

 

Entry   Elog stopped working, posted by Gillian Sabberton on Tue Sep 8 14:36:10 2009 

We have been running elog for a couple of years now and this morning it stopped working.

We have tried to rstart it and it says successful start but still does not run, when doing a restart it says stop failed start success.

Does anyone have any ideas.

thanks

 

 

 

    icon2.gif   Re: Elog stopped working, posted by Gillian Sabberton on Tue Sep 8 14:59:30 2009 

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Gillian Sabberton wrote:

We have been running elog for a couple of years now and this morning it stopped working.

We have tried to rstart it and it says successful start but still does not run, when doing a restart it says stop failed start success.

Does anyone have any ideas.

thanks

You shoudl start elogd interactively in a DOS box to see if there is any error. Maybe disk full or a network problem... 

 It is running on a linux box, we have started in it in a telnet session, and no errors appear, as I am new to e-log is there an error log anywhere.

    icon14.gif   Re: Elog stopped working, posted by Gillian Sabberton on Mon Sep 14 13:04:57 2009 

Gillian Sabberton wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Gillian Sabberton wrote:

We have been running elog for a couple of years now and this morning it stopped working.

We have tried to rstart it and it says successful start but still does not run, when doing a restart it says stop failed start success.

Does anyone have any ideas.

thanks

You shoudl start elogd interactively in a DOS box to see if there is any error. Maybe disk full or a network problem... 

 It is running on a linux box, we have started in it in a telnet session, and no errors appear, as I am new to e-log is there an error log anywhere.

 Have fixed this by removing the last added user from the Passwd file.

    icon14.gif   Re: Elog stopped working, posted by Gillian Sabberton on Mon Sep 14 13:05:35 2009 

Gillian Sabberton wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Gillian Sabberton wrote:

We have been running elog for a couple of years now and this morning it stopped working.

We have tried to rstart it and it says successful start but still does not run, when doing a restart it says stop failed start success.

Does anyone have any ideas.

thanks

You shoudl start elogd interactively in a DOS box to see if there is any error. Maybe disk full or a network problem... 

 It is running on a linux box, we have started in it in a telnet session, and no errors appear, as I am new to e-log is there an error log anywhere.

 Have fixed this by removing the last added user from the Passwd file.

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6