Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 591 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Categorydown OS ELOG Version Subject
  379   Mon Jun 30 00:11:09 2003 Warning Joseph Giaimegiaime@phys.lsu.eduBug reportMac OSX2.3.8runtime error under Mac OS X 10.2
I have been trying to build and run elog under Mac OS  X 10.2.6, without sucess.  I 
understand that this is not one of the 'supported' platforms, but I hope that there is someone   
here who might know the work-around to my problem.

I've tried building elog 2.2.5, 2.3.6, 2.3.7, and 2.3.8.  I've tried using the compiler that comes 
in the Mac OS X 10.2 box, as well as the gcc-based compiler supplied in Apple's Dec 2002 
developer update (gcc 3.1), and the June '03 update as well (gcc 3.3).

elog builds without error in all cases I tried.

When I run it, it will correctly serve the demo notebook.  However, when the user clicks on the 
test message to display it in full, there is a seg fault.

I suspect that the trouble might be with something defined in time.h.

I've run it in gdb, and the result is appended to this message.  This is for gcc 3.3 and elog 
2.3.8.


I would greatly appreciate any hints or suggestions.

Cheers, Joe

---

[satsuma:~/Documents/elog_build/elog-2.3.8] jgiaime% gdb ./elogd
GNU gdb 5.3-20030128 (Apple version gdb-282) (Fri Jun 13 03:33:07 GMT 2003)
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "powerpc-apple-darwin".
Reading symbols for shared libraries .. done
(gdb) run
Starting program: /Users/jgiaime/Documents/elog_build/elog-2.3.8/elogd 
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
Indexing logbook "demo" ... ok
Server listening on port 8080...

Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory.
0x00005870 in el_retrieve (lbs=0x1, message_id=50, date=0xbfff2500 "demo", 
attr_list=0x0, attrib=0x365620, n_attr=1, text=0xbfff2280 "1", textsize=0x1, 
in_reply_to=0x0, reply_to=0x0, attachment=0x0, encoding=0x0, locked_by=0x0) at src/
elogd.c:2775
2775    {
(gdb) up
#1  0x0001d9b4 in interprete (lbook=0x1 <Address 0x1 out of bounds>, path=0xbfff2280 
"1") at src/elogd.c:12279
12279       show_elog_message(lbs, dec_path, command);
(gdb) up
#2  0x0001db10 in decode_get (logbook=0xbffff340 "demo", string=0x3a300a "1") at src/
elogd.c:12325
12325     interprete(logbook, path);
(gdb) up
#3  0x00020080 in server_loop (tcp_port=836736, daemon=-1073732640) at src/
elogd.c:13398
13398             decode_get(logbook, p);
(gdb) up
#4  0x00021134 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff850) at src/elogd.c:13832
13832     server_loop(tcp_port, daemon);
(gdb) up
Initial frame selected; you cannot go up.
(gdb) 
  390   Thu Jul 10 10:11:41 2003 Entry nickc1nick@nick.comBug report 2.3.9 (src)Currently being edited option has gone
In the current source which ive compiled and am using on our elog system, 
the feature that you put in for me that says "Entry is currently being 
edited by Joe Bloggs on 192.168.0.10" has vanished.

It removes existing locks from before updating the binary but doesnt but 
new ones on.

Is this something that was removed intentionally or by accident ?

Thanks
  391   Thu Jul 10 13:02:53 2003 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug report 2.3.9 (src)Re: Currently being edited option has gone
> In the current source which ive compiled and am using on our elog system, 
> the feature that you put in for me that says "Entry is currently being 
> edited by Joe Bloggs on 192.168.0.10" has vanished.
> 
> It removes existing locks from before updating the binary but doesnt but 
> new ones on.
> 
> Is this something that was removed intentionally or by accident ?

No, but there is now a flag "Use Lock = 0 | 1" which is zero by default, 
since not all people want this feature. So put a "Use Locl = 1" and you 
should be fine gain.
  392   Fri Jul 11 11:09:10 2003 Reply nickc1nick@nick.comBug report 2.3.9 (src)Re: Currently being edited option has gone
Excellent thanks
  406   Tue Jul 22 16:21:51 2003 Question R. Beekmanrbeekman@hiscom.nlBug reportLinux | Windows2.3.9Bottom text = <file> not displayed in every screen?
I tried to add a file with the  "Bottom text = <file>" option.

Although one would suggest that the bottom text file is included in every 
page, I only saw the file appear in the page that appears when you issue 
the "cmd=Edit" command.

Resolving this would enhance the ability to create skin.
  408   Thu Jul 24 15:10:14 2003 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux | Windows2.3.9Re: Bottom text = <file> not displayed in every screen?
> I tried to add a file with the  "Bottom text = <file>" option.
> 
> Although one would suggest that the bottom text file is included in every 
> page, I only saw the file appear in the page that appears when you issue 
> the "cmd=Edit" command.

That's really weired. The file is displayed at the bottom of single messages, 
and the message list, but NOT at the form, which you reach with the "Edit" 
command. So all I can suggest ist the following:

- Hit the reload button on your browser each time you change that file, to 
make sure the browser does not display a page from its cache

- The HTML file is *included* in the normal page, so it should not contain 
<HTML> or <BODY> tags. Start with a simple file containing something like

<center>Test</center>

and see what you get.

- Make sure the file is in the elog "resource" directory, which gets 
displayed if you start elogd with the "-v" flag.

Let me know if any of this helped.
  419   Thu Jul 31 16:02:41 2003 Warning Heiko Scheith.scheit@mpi-hd.mpg.deBug reportLinux2.3.9not proper HTML
I just upgraded from 2.3.5 to 2.3.9.

There are some errors in the generated HTML.  Most of the time
the browser renders everything correctly but sometimes not.  Please
check especially (http://validator.w3.org/):

- http://midas.psi.ch/elogdemo/Database/7
    There are too many <table> tags before the attribute list:
    'Type', 'Operating system',...  This should be just one table and
    not each row a separate table.  Also the first <table> tag lies
    outside a <td> tag of the enclosing table.

- http://midas.psi.ch/elogdemo/forum/
  429   Mon Sep 8 11:32:42 2003 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.3.9Re: not proper HTML
> There are some errors in the generated HTML.  Most of the time
> the browser renders everything correctly but sometimes not.  Please
> check especially (http://validator.w3.org/):

I did so and fixed several errors. Now the W3 validator doesn't complain any 
more. New version under CVS.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6