Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 619 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Show attachments  Show all entries    6453 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 618, 619, 620 ... 805, 806, 807   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  1579   Tue Jan 10 00:32:19 2006 Question David Brodydbrody@echo-inc.comQuestion 2.5.8-2Date imports from CSV incorrectly
When I import from a CSV file, dates formatted as mm/dd/yy always get imported as 12/31/1969

Here are the parameters I am using for dates:

Attributes = Ticket #, Status, Assigned To, Status Date, Install Date, Category, Activity, Environment, Component, TstTrk
Type Status Date = date
Type Install Date = date
Date format = %A, %d %B, %Y

Preset Status Date = $date


Thanks!

DB
  1577   Mon Jan 9 20:53:28 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.6.0Re: MS Fonts only in ELCode options?

T. Ribbrock wrote:
I'm just after installing 2.6.0 and marvelling at all the changes, especially ELCode (I was using 2.5.8 previously). However, I noticed that the "FONT" menu for ELCodes only offers Microsoft fonts Astonished - something I usually avoid like hell when publishing web content, as I cannot rely on those being installed on the clients. As far as I can see there is no easy way to change this, short of patching the source - or is there?
I'd want to add at least options like "serif" and "sans-serif" and maybe some standard (Unix\?) fonts like "Helvetica".


In revision 1593 I implemented a "Fonts = ..." option where you can specify a list of fonts to be shown on the list. I tried however the MS set of fonts on a Linux system, and found that the MS fonts got mapped to Unix fonts in a reasonable way. Even the Comic Sans MS font was avalilable.
  1576   Mon Jan 9 20:19:32 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.6.0Re: HelpELCode needs to be present in "Menu commands"?

T. Ribbrock wrote:
Another little issue I came across was this: I'm using "Menu commands" and "Guest Menu commands" in my configuration. When I logged in and started to create a new entry, clicking on the URL that is behind "ELCode" at the bottom of the screen (and accesses the help for the ELCodes) resulted in a "command denied". The only way to get around this was to add "HelpELCode" to "Menu commands" - but now it also shows up in the menus, which is not what I want. Is there any way around this?


Thanks for reporting that problem. I fixed that in revision 1592.
  1575   Mon Jan 9 20:09:16 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.6.0Re: "Logkook dir" in top group [global] section ineffective

Yoshio Imai wrote:
One strange thing (maybe it isn't strange at all) is the following behaviour: when the list view is set to "summary", then the line containing the entry where we clicked "list" is highlighted, however when the list view is set to "full", it isn't. Is this "a bug, or a feature"? Wink


Was a bug. I have fixed that in revision 1591.
  1574   Wed Jan 4 15:27:31 2006 Reply Yoshio ImaiBug reportLinux2.6.0Re: "Logkook dir" in top group [global] section ineffective

Stefan Ritt wrote:
I implemented that request. When you click on "list", it takes you to the listing page containing the current entry, which is even highlighted. Have a look at this forum if this is what you like.


Thank you!
I just installed the latest revision; it is exactly what we need.
I found one problem, however: while linking the binaries for elogd, the linker complained about an undefined reference to forkpty implemented in libutil. I had to add the linker option
 -lutil
to the Makefile target elogd:, then it compiled correctly.

One strange thing (maybe it isn't strange at all) is the following behaviour: when the list view is set to "summary", then the line containing the entry where we clicked "list" is highlighted, however when the list view is set to "full", it isn't. Is this "a bug, or a feature"? Wink

Thanks for the work from all, and happy new year.

Yoshio
  1573   Wed Jan 4 12:26:31 2006 Question T. Ribbrockemgaron@gmx.netQuestionLinux2.6.0HelpELCode needs to be present in "Menu commands"?
Another little issue I came across was this: I'm using "Menu commands" and "Guest Menu commands" in my configuration. When I logged in and started to create a new entry, clicking on the URL that is behind "ELCode" at the bottom of the screen (and accesses the help for the ELCodes) resulted in a "command denied". The only way to get around this was to add "HelpELCode" to "Menu commands" - but now it also shows up in the menus, which is not what I want. Is there any way around this?
  1572   Wed Jan 4 12:05:21 2006 Question T. Ribbrockemgaron@gmx.netQuestionLinux2.6.0MS Fonts only in ELCode options?
I'm just after installing 2.6.0 and marvelling at all the changes, especially ELCode (I was using 2.5.8 previously). However, I noticed that the "FONT" menu for ELCodes only offers Microsoft fonts Astonished - something I usually avoid like hell when publishing web content, as I cannot rely on those being installed on the clients. As far as I can see there is no easy way to change this, short of patching the source - or is there?
I'd want to add at least options like "serif" and "sans-serif" and maybe some standard (Unix\?) fonts like "Helvetica".
  1571   Tue Jan 3 17:20:16 2006 Entry Mikemlmoore@pella.comBug report V2.6.0elogd 2.6.0 crash on password Forgot?
I have been having a repeatable crash on V2.6.0 everytime someone tries to recover a password using the option from the login screen. See attachment for a jpg of the message.

This is occuring on windows 2003. But I have also tested it on windows XP and it occurs there as well. In addition on XP I did a generic installtion and added the password option to the DEMO application and it fails there as well.

Mike
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 618, 619, 620 ... 805, 806, 807   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6