Re: Error message: "Attachment #6 of entry #0 not found", posted by Christian Schult on Tue Oct 18 08:02:44 2005
|
> > Hi all, I get messages like this
> > Attachment #16 of entry #0 not found
> > Please use your browser's back button to go back
> > always when clicking on an entry in summary or threaded view.
> > I can only read entries when browsing them in full view. How can i fix this?
> > regards, Christian
>
> I need some more information. Can you send me your elogd.cfg, and show
> me the URLs your browser displays during your navigation?
Well, this is my elog.conf:
[global]
logbook tabs = 1
port = 8081 ; Automatically added in installation.
Hosts allow = localhost, jazz.cocis.de, 127.0.0.1, 192.168.
Hosts deny = ALL
[debian]
Theme = default
Comment = debian logbook
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
Required Attributes = Author, Type
Subst Author = $long_name
Subst Email = $user_email
Locked Attributes = Last Revision
Subst on Edit Last Revision = $date by $long_name
Options Type = Routine, Software Installation, Problem Fixed, Configuration, Other
Options Category = General, Hardware, Software, Network, Other
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date, Type
Password file = /var/lib/elog/elogpasswd.pwd
Admin user = admin
Reverse sort = 1
Restrict edit = 1
Suppress Email to users = 1
This is the URL after logging in:
http://localhost:8081/debian/17?cmd=List&mode=summary
When i click on one of the entrys, i get thar error message.
URL: http://localhost:8081/debian/debian/17
It says: "Attachment #17 of entry #0 not found
Please use your browser's back button to go back"
regards, Christian |
3.1.5 - Mass edit bug + Wrong version, posted by Cryptage on Tue Feb 7 12:51:54 2023
|
Hi,
I've just installed the news 3.1.5 version and I have 2 problems.
I don't know if it works with older versions because I started with latest.
- When using "select" menu then "edit" for multiple entries, the text is replaced with "- keep original text here -" instead of keeping the original values. Really annoying...
Another problem too, if I want to edit after, I have the error message "only author - keep original text here - can edit" although the author column is OK..
It looks like this problem is global and not only on text column.
- Version number is indicated "ELOG V3.1.4" instead of V3.1.5.
My config file :
|
[global]
port = 8888
language = french
Authentication = Webserver
Page title = XXXXX
SSL = 0
Interface = 127.0.0.1
URL = https://elog.xxxxxx.xxx/
Usr = elog
Grp = elog
Logfile = /var/log/elog.log
Logging level = 3
Self register = 0
Password file = xxxx.xxx
Logout to main = 0
Max content length = 10485760
List after submit = 1
Search all logbooks = 0
Refresh = 300
Show last default = 7
[Technique]
Theme = custom
Menu commands = List, New, Edit, Reply, Find
List Menu commands = List, New, Find, Select, Config
Guest menu commands = Login
Admin user = xxxxxx
Login user = xxxx, xxxxx, xxxxxx
Restrict edit = 1
Restrict edit time = 1
Login expiration = 2
Allow password change = 0
Comment = Test suivi technique
Attributes = Auteur, Intervenant, Quand, Objet, Categorie, Centre, Statut
Type Quand = date
Date format = %d/%m/%Y
Options Intervenant = xxxxxxxxxxx, Autre
Options Centre = xxxxxxxx, Autre
Options Categorie = xxxxxxxx, Autre
Options Statut = A faire, En cours, En attente, Termine, Autre
Extendable Options = Categorie, Intervenant
Required Attributes = Intervenant
Page Title = ELOG - $Categorie
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Categorie, Centre
Preset Auteur = $long_name
Option Auteur = Filled In Automatically
Locked Attributes = Auteur
Use lock = 1
|
I'm using Apache as reverse proxy with SSL and transparent Kerberos authentication (Microsoft Active Directory).
URL via Apache is https://elog.xxxxxx.xxx (no subdirectory).
Thanks for your help. |
|
Re: 3.1.5 - Mass edit bug + Wrong version, posted by Cryptage on Tue Feb 7 17:31:20 2023
|
Thanks for your prompt help.
It looks good for text but I still have problem with "select" function (even in English).
If I use "select" menu :
- When multiple values are selected it indicates "only user - keep original values - can edit" (freshly created).
- When a single value is selected, it indicates "only user XXX can edit" where XXX is my truncated name (the first 4 letters).
After editing in with admin account the author is now my truncated name :
If I want to edit a single entry (without select menu) it works perfectly.
Thanks.
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
I checked and found that the bug which removed the main text was there since the beginning, but it's only triggered if you switch elog to French, it doesn't happen in the English version. I changed a bit the text processing so now it should work also in the French version.
I also changed the version number which is shown at the bottom to 3.1.5.
Stefan
|
|
|
Re: Login user problem, posted by Byron on Fri Apr 4 19:46:56 2003
|
> > When I use the <Login user => option to specify what users I want to be
> > able to login into the different logbooks it does not seem to work. Is
> > there something else you are supposed to do to restrict what logbooks
users
> > can log into?
>
> First, you need version 2.3.4 or later, second, you need a "password file =
> xxx" entry in your elogd.cfg to turn on user-level password access. If both
> is true and you still don't succeed, send me your elogd.cfg.
>
> - Stefan
Ok, I installed the latest version and this is fixed. Thanx! |
|
Re: Password Problem, posted by Byron on Fri Apr 4 19:49:32 2003
|
> > I noticed that when I put in a password such as <test1> a person can
login
> > with the password <test2> or any other number at the end. Is the
> > encryption not able to tell the difference between numbers? The
encrypted
> > passwords even look the same in the password file. Is this a bug?
>
> This is really strange. Encryption only works on ASCII characters and does
> not distinguish between letters and digits. When I try to reporoduce that,
> the system distinguishes well between "test1" and "test2". The first gives
> encrypted "dGVzdDE=" and the second gives "dGVzdDI=", note the
different "E"
> and "I". So I have no clue right now what is wrong in your installation. If
> running under Linux, you can compile elogd after adding "-DHAVE_CRYPT"
and "-
> lcrypt" to the Makefile to use the standard Linux crypt() function, but I
> would rather like to understand what is wrong in your case.
>
> - Stefan
Ok, try it with the passwords <hello1> and <hello2>. Then when you go to log
in, put in the password of <hello> with any single number after it and let me
know if the problem shows up for you because that is the password I was
using. When I look at it encrypted in the passwd file they look the same. I
also installed the latest version today which is newer than the one I was
using before and it still does it. I appreciate your time.
Byron |
|
Multiple versions of elog on one server, posted by Chris Smith on Wed Feb 20 21:13:28 2013
|
Is there a way of having multiple copies of elog running on one windows 2003 server? different ports?
I need to access 2 different elogd.cfg files. |
|
Re: Multiple versions of elog on one server, posted by Chris Smith on Wed Feb 20 23:41:00 2013
|
| David Pilgram wrote: |
|
| Chris Smith wrote: |
|
Is there a way of having multiple copies of elog running on one windows 2003 server? different ports?
I need to access 2 different elogd.cfg files.
|
It's probably not of much help, but for a short time I ran two elog daemons on the same linux box, using different ports. It was thus able to run with two separate elogd.cfg files. This is linux, and heavily biased to my eccentric way of running this linux box, but started them as:
/usr/local/sbin/elogd -p 8080 -c /home/logbooks1/elogd1.cfg -d /home/logbooks1
/usr/local/sbin/elogd -p 8081 -c /home/logbooks2/elogd2.cfg -d /home/logbooks2
Do note that as I was the only user on that linux box, I didn't have login etc.
However, I was soon asked questions by Andreas as to how I found this running, as he had encountered problems with an earlier version. To be honest, that stopped me experimenting too far with this at that point, as well as a coincidental upgrading of my hardware.
But I was doing this *not* because I had to run two separate elogd.cfg files, but other reasons which meant splitting into two at that time vastly improved the performance of elog on the linux box at that time. So while I didn't actually enounter any problems in doing so, I only have limited experience - and, of course, absolutely none on running even one [windows equivalent of a daemon] on Windows.
I am assuming here you have good reason for two separate elogd.cfg files, rather than just wanting to run two separate logbooks - guessing here, but one set public (no login) and one set private (with login)?
|
I need to do this because there are 2 different groups that each have 6 or 7 different logbooks in their elogd.cfg files. (and they can't access each others log books)
Currently the first group accesses elog as http:elog.com:8080. The elogd windows service executes "C:\Program FilesELOG\elogd.exe" -D -c "C:\Program Files\ELOG\elogd.cfg"
From what I can tell, whats needed is either some way to get the windows service to run a different config file or there needs to be a way of creating a second elog windows service that points to a different elogd.cfg file. Is there some way of doing this? |
|
Re: Multiple versions of elog on one server, posted by Chris Smith on Thu Feb 21 20:05:44 2013
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Chris Smith wrote: |
|
| David Pilgram wrote: |
|
| Chris Smith wrote: |
|
Is there a way of having multiple copies of elog running on one windows 2003 server? different ports?
I need to access 2 different elogd.cfg files.
|
It's probably not of much help, but for a short time I ran two elog daemons on the same linux box, using different ports. It was thus able to run with two separate elogd.cfg files. This is linux, and heavily biased to my eccentric way of running this linux box, but started them as:
/usr/local/sbin/elogd -p 8080 -c /home/logbooks1/elogd1.cfg -d /home/logbooks1
/usr/local/sbin/elogd -p 8081 -c /home/logbooks2/elogd2.cfg -d /home/logbooks2
Do note that as I was the only user on that linux box, I didn't have login etc.
However, I was soon asked questions by Andreas as to how I found this running, as he had encountered problems with an earlier version. To be honest, that stopped me experimenting too far with this at that point, as well as a coincidental upgrading of my hardware.
But I was doing this *not* because I had to run two separate elogd.cfg files, but other reasons which meant splitting into two at that time vastly improved the performance of elog on the linux box at that time. So while I didn't actually enounter any problems in doing so, I only have limited experience - and, of course, absolutely none on running even one [windows equivalent of a daemon] on Windows.
I am assuming here you have good reason for two separate elogd.cfg files, rather than just wanting to run two separate logbooks - guessing here, but one set public (no login) and one set private (with login)?
|
I need to do this because there are 2 different groups that each have 6 or 7 different logbooks in their elogd.cfg files. (and they can't access each others log books)
Currently the first group accesses elog as http:elog.com:8080. The elogd windows service executes "C:\Program FilesELOG\elogd.exe" -D -c "C:\Program Files\ELOG\elogd.cfg"
From what I can tell, whats needed is either some way to get the windows service to run a different config file or there needs to be a way of creating a second elog windows service that points to a different elogd.cfg file. Is there some way of doing this?
|
Have you checked the option "Top groups", which was made especially for that case? You can create several independent sets of logbooks not seeing each other.
|
I will check out the "Top Groups". But another question, the documentation says "Prior to ELOG version 2.4.1, one had to run two elogd servers in parallel, listening under different ports." ... how do you set this up? |
|