| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1536
|
Fri Nov 25 14:05:08 2005 |
 | Yoshio Imai | | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.0beta5 | Re: "Logkook dir" in top group [global] section ineffective |
OK, I found the note about "Logbook dir" in Stephen Wood's entry (http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/1101)  |
|
1535
|
Thu Nov 24 20:08:00 2005 |
 | Yoshio Imai | | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.0beta5 | "Logkook dir" in top group [global] section ineffective |
Hi, it's me again!
I have found one possible bug. We have declared top groups for our logbooks; one for administration and one for the shift logbooks. In the [global]-section there is a "Logbook dir"-statement of the form
[global]
Top group Admin = <...>
Top group Shiftlogs = beamtime1,beamtime2,...
Logbook dir = /data/logbooks
Now, in the [global Shiftlogs] section there is another "Logbook dir"-statement to have all associated logbooks in one tree:
[global Shiftlogs]
Logbook dir = /data/logbooks/shift-logbooks
[beamtime1]
Subdir = beamtime1
The problem is, that the manually created subdirectories /data/logbooks/shift-logbooks/beamtimeN are ignored, and the elogd creates new "Subdir"-directories /data/logbooks/beamtimeN (as if the "Logbook dir" statement in the top group [global] section were ineffective). Is this a bug or configuration error from our side?
There are also one question/request (you see that we use the elog extensively now ):
When searching for a particular event in our shift log using the "Find" function, it would often be useful not to go to the single entry, but to the page where that entry resides. This way we can see the whole context of the event. When clicking onto an entry in the "Find" result page, this takes us of course to the single entry, but could you add a function to go to the page instead. Alternatively, is it possible to include a button "Go to page" in the single entry view (it need not even be exactly +/-N entries around, the usual page partition would do)?
Thanks in advance.
Yoshio |
|
1534
|
Thu Nov 24 08:27:01 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.6.0-beta | Re: Email format flags |
| Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos wrote: | I've been tried to format our email notification messages
like this forum, but I couldn't.
Every email notification is sent in plain text although I've tried
all options listed in documentation about Email Format flags. 
What is the Email Format flag that I need to use ?
Is there something else that I have to configure ? ?) |
The email notification is under revision right now, that's why 2.6.0 is still in beta. It will change again before the final release. I want to make a multipart/alternative encoding, where plain text and HTML are sent in the same email, and the user can select on the email client which part to view.
In the 2.6.0-beta5, you can select the eamil format with
Email encoding = 4
which then produces the same notifications as the forum. |
|
1533
|
Tue Nov 22 20:22:04 2005 |
 | Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos | elaine@ccuec.unicamp.br | Question | Linux | 2.6.0-beta | Email format flags |
I've been tried to format our email notification messages
like this forum, but I couldn't.
Every email notification is sent in plain text although I've tried
all options listed in documentation about Email Format flags.
What is the Email Format flag that I need to use ?
Is there something else that I have to configure ? ?)
Regards,
Elaine |
|
1532
|
Tue Nov 22 17:38:24 2005 |
 | Michael Husbyn | michaelh@online.no | Question | | 2.6.0-beta | Thread sort / display order |
Is there a way to choose the display order in threaded mode.
Eg:
1 Test
2 Version 2.0 Testing 1
3 Version 2.5 Testing 2
4 Version 2.3 Testing 3
But the preferred sort order (not the ID) is something like this:
1 Test
2 Version 2.0 Testing 1
4 Version 2.3 Testing 3
3 Version 2.5 Testing 2
Example of parameter perhaps:
Thread order = Field1, $id
Or is this something too difficult to implement? Or already there?
Best regards
Michael Husbyn |
|
1531
|
Tue Nov 22 11:35:56 2005 |
 | Alex H | alex@synergie-inf.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.0-beta | Re: Undesirable TAG { } |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | | That problem was fixed on June 24th, 2005. So please upgrade to the current 2.6.0-beta5 version. |
Updated ! Thanks |
|
1530
|
Tue Nov 22 09:49:30 2005 |
| Alex H | alex@synergie-inf.com | Request | Windows | 2.6.0-beta | Re: Add Button on calendar |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Alex H wrote: | | I don't have the today date highlighted so I don't have some visual effect to find the date immediatly. Is it a bug or other ? |
If I click Find on this page, then click on an calendar, I get following picture:
which clearly shows me the 21st highlighted. Do you get a different picture? Which browser are you using? If you get the proper picture here at the forum, but a different one at your installation, it might be that the default.css file is out of date in your installation and you have to copy over a newer one. |
My default.css was not updated ! Thanks Stefan. |
|
1530
|
Tue Nov 22 09:49:30 2005 |
| Alex H | alex@synergie-inf.com | Request | Windows | 2.6.0-beta | Re: Add Button on calendar |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Alex H wrote: | | I don't have the today date highlighted so I don't have some visual effect to find the date immediatly. Is it a bug or other ? |
If I click Find on this page, then click on an calendar, I get following picture:
which clearly shows me the 21st highlighted. Do you get a different picture? Which browser are you using? If you get the proper picture here at the forum, but a different one at your installation, it might be that the default.css file is out of date in your installation and you have to copy over a newer one. |
My default.css was not updated ! Thanks Stefan. |