Re: changing the default to plain text rather than elcode, posted by Noah P on Thu Sep 8 03:37:44 2005
|
I, too, found that this elcode.js file was missing. However, it seems to be present on this demo site!
so, I downloaded it from this very demo site, and saved it to my system (in the root of your resources folder). This (so far) seems to have made the "ELCode" |
Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 20:23:59 2005
|
What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9? I searched
the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this.
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 20:47:02 2005
|
> What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9? I searched
> the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this.
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 20:51:23 2005
|
> > What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9? I searched
> > the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this.
>
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 20:55:36 2005
|
> I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3.
> Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> strlcpy.h. Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 20:58:11 2005
|
> > I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3.
> > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> > strlcpy.h. Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 21:08:56 2005
|
> > > I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3.
> > > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> > > strlcpy.h. Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 21:14:53 2005
|
> > > > I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3.
> > > > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> > > > strlcpy.h. Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
|