Re: New feature request for Options list, posted by David Pilgram on Thu Feb 28 16:03:36 2019
|
May I slip my vote in for this, especially if it would allow more than 100 attributes (the default, and I do know how to increase it).
I even considered cutting that into two groups,. the first being words like "New", "Re-" and the second being actions.
Clunkey and binned. |
|
Re: Windows Server 2012 - moving logs, posted by David Pilgram on Thu May 16 21:49:06 2019
|
Hi Lesley,
Perhaps I can restate Stefan's comment. The data structure of an elog entry, or indeed the structure of daily file(s) for any particular
logbook has not changed between v2 and v3. What has changed is the directory structure. A set of sub-directories (named by calendar years) |
|
Re: Record ID corruption, posted by David Pilgram on Sun May 3 18:05:32 2020
|
Hi,
I've had problems in the past due to a dodgy pointer creating branches despite a "No branches" in the configuration file.
It would be very interesting to see what the 200428a.log file looks like with these entries: in the screenshot they appear to be shown in time order, but |
|
Re: Record ID corruption, posted by David Pilgram on Mon May 4 14:55:53 2020
|
Hi Frank,
There are two interesting points about the log file.
1. Entry 5658 is timestamped later than 5659, but is earlier in the entry list. It also is "In Reply to" 5659. despite |
|
Re: Record ID corruption, posted by David Pilgram on Sat May 23 16:15:38 2020
|
Hi Frank,
Good bit of detective work. To me it suggests that something as yet undetermined occurs, that, when the 57th reply happens, causes the
issue. If that "something" hasn't happened, all is well. Apart from Heinz varieties (not true, in fact), 57 isn't an obvious |
|
Re: Expanding column width when viewing in Summary mode, posted by David Pilgram on Sun Jul 19 13:14:36 2020
|
Anyone who knows me knows I (ab)use elog a lot. And this one is another of a long list of cheats and work arounds rather than modifying the
code properly.
In summary mode, the top row are titles, and if they are long, they will dominate the width of that column. Similarly if they are short, |
|
Re: Duplicate entries, posted by David Pilgram on Wed Dec 2 15:57:25 2020
|
I'm not sure if this is what you want.
If you want to prevent "accidental" replies being identical to the original message, you can force a situation where the user will
be alerted that they have to do something if they really want to make a reply. |
|
Re: Duplicate entries, posted by David Pilgram on Wed Dec 2 18:22:37 2020
|
Hi Harry,
I'm just an elog (ab)user, not one of the developers. My original 2017 reply was to report an issue that was due to hardware, but somehow
overcame a configuration flag (no multiple replies to a single entry), which might have been the same problem as the original poster, Alan Grant, was observing, |