Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 678 of 806  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  1100   Mon Apr 18 19:27:09 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestAll2.5.8Re: Link To command...
> Is it possible to create a Link To command (ala Copy To, Move To) that
> would allow you to reference an entry in another log book without copying it?
> This would be handy as the info would be kept current in both log books.
> My thought is that it would create a psuedo entry in the other log
> book that pointed back at the originating log book entry (similar to a 
> UNIX soft link)

What you ask for is not possible due to internal reasons. The underlying database
does not support links. But what you can do is to reference a logbook entry with

elog :<loglook>/<id>

So I can reference your question with elog:Forum/1099. Some people make even
complete "summary" pages where they reference a whole set of other logbook entries like

Your question is at elog:Forum/1099
A script for thumbnail generation is at elog:Contributions/12
Demo entries: elog:Linux+Demo/14, elog:Linux+demo/1
  1099   Mon Apr 18 17:57:38 2005 Idea Tim Iskandertim.iskander@criticallink.comRequestAll2.5.8Link To command...
Is it possible to create a Link To command (ala Copy To, Move To) that
would allow you to reference an entry in another log book without copying it?
This would be handy as the info would be kept current in both log books.
My thought is that it would create a psuedo entry in the other log
book that pointed back at the originating log book entry (similar to a 
UNIX soft link)
/Tim
  1098   Mon Apr 18 17:02:20 2005 Question Stephen A. Woodsaw@jlab.org Linux2.5.8-3Directories in top groups
I am trying to unify several existing logbook collections that run on
seperate servers under a single server using groups.  For a top group, under
"[global topgroupname]", I would like to redefine the resource directory or
the logbook directory so that everything except for the .cfg is at it
original location.  However, it seems like "Resource dir" and "Logbook dir"
can not be redefined in the global section for specific groups.  Is it
possible to redefine these directories for each top group, or is it feature
that could be added?

I could probably do what I want with soft-links, but redefining the resource
dir just seems to be right way to do this.  (For one thing, I would like
different favicons for each group.)
  1097   Mon Apr 18 09:04:21 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportWindows2.5.8-4Re: Mail not sent but message says it has been sent
> If my email host refuses to send the email (476 connections denied), we
> still get the message that the email has been sent - and no error message.
> 
> How do I or can I send authentication information to the email server?

This is not implemented right now, since the SMTP server at our institute does
not use authentication, so I could not test it. If you give me access to a
SMTP server with authentication, I could implement it.
  1096   Sun Apr 17 09:35:30 2005 Question Mikael Salonvaarahmsalonv@syr.eduBug reportWindows2.5.8-4Mail not sent but message says it has been sent
If my email host refuses to send the email (476 connections denied), we
still get the message that the email has been sent - and no error message.

How do I or can I send authentication information to the email server?
  1095   Fri Apr 15 22:26:06 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.5.8-2Re: logbook clone
> When I create a new logbook (I used an existing one as a template) elog  
> does not works anymore...  

Fixed in CVS.
  1094   Fri Apr 15 22:24:49 2005 Reply Michael Husbynmichaelh@online.noQuestionLinux2.5.8-3Re: MIME encoding of mail?
> > If I read the RFC correctly when you use B encoding you are using BASE64 encoding.
> > Maybe that could be a solution?
> 
> Indeed it is. Works for all email programs I know. So I added that to elog, new
> version is committed to CVS. Let me know if it works for you.


Stefan! You are *THE MAN* :)

It works :)

You are indeed "speedy gonzales" ;)

Thank you very much!


Best regards
Michael 'very impressed' Husbyn
  1093   Fri Apr 15 21:49:00 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.5.8-3Re: MIME encoding of mail?
> If I read the RFC correctly when you use B encoding you are using BASE64 encoding.
> Maybe that could be a solution?

Indeed it is. Works for all email programs I know. So I added that to elog, new
version is committed to CVS. Let me know if it works for you.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6