ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
1719
|
Thu Feb 23 09:45:54 2006 |
| Holger Mundhahs | holger.mundhahs@vtg-rail.com | Request | Windows | V2.6.1-165 | Re: How to setup Change attributes in detail view/edit mode ? |
No, I havn't tried it, because it's the only way where I can see ALL attributes, and
I belief, that it works to hide the attributes on all views.
Here an Example:
I have 5 attributes where I can enter values, and 5 addtitional attributes build on them.
I can't see all of them in list view, so the only way to see/use them is the detailed view.
But because there is no value to insert/change these attributes should be hidden in NEW/EDIT mode.
As an workaround I LOCK/FIX these attributes so I can't insert values, but there are now many empty lines.
So if you can implement this functionality it would be great, but if not it's not so bad,
I can "live" with it ;)
Regards
Holger
> > I've changed the category to "Request" because I think it would be practical
> > if I can hide the attributes which are build on values of other attributes with
> > "Change".
>
> Have you tried
>
> Show Attributes = Admin, Hostname, IP-Adresse, Funktion, RIB Hostname, RIB IP
>
> ???
>
> Does it bother you if then the attributes are also hidden in the detailed view? |
1736
|
Wed Mar 1 10:30:51 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Windows | V2.6.1-165 | Re: How to setup Change attributes in detail view/edit mode ? |
I implemented a "Hide attributes = ..." option, with which you can do what you requested, but unfortunately I'm
sitting here in Siberia and have only limited internet access, so I can only submit the modification next weekend.
- Stefan |
1888
|
Wed Aug 9 12:25:57 2006 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Question | Windows | V2.6.2-169 | Retain original ELOG id when moving an entry to an archive weblog |
Hi There,
We have a number of weblogs where we regular archive off 'completed' entries to a separate archive weblog:
Is it possible to retain the original ELOG id when moving an entry to an archive weblog, or have a locked field which holds the original id which we could subsequently reference in the archive?
Many Thanks
Fergus |
1889
|
Wed Aug 9 19:40:42 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | V2.6.2-169 | Re: Retain original ELOG id when moving an entry to an archive weblog |
Fergus Lynch wrote: | We have a number of weblogs where we regular archive off 'completed' entries to a separate archive weblog:
Is it possible to retain the original ELOG id when moving an entry to an archive weblog, or have a locked field which holds the original id which we could subsequently reference in the archive? |
First of all, a reference to the original ELOG entry would not help if it's moved into another logbook (archive). Keeping the id is not possible technically, since it severs as a kind of primary key, which must be unique etc. There is however the possibility to create a "secondary" ID, using the Preset xxx = ### functionality. The attribute xxx will have increasing numbers just like the primary ID. You even can combine this with the current year or month (see documentation). The problem now is how to reference such an entry. You cannot just type elog:123 as this only references the primary ID. You would have to do a "hidden" search such as
http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/?xxx=###
where ### is your secondary id. This will of course be slower because if you click on such a reference, your whole archive will be searched for. |
2025
|
Tue Oct 31 14:45:05 2006 |
| deletoille | xavier.deletoille@synchrotron-soleil.fr | Bug report | Windows | V2.6.2-172 | checkbox |
Hello,
I found a small Bug when I create an entry. I activate a checkbox (attachement1) but when I upload a file, the activation disappears (attachement 2). I have to activate again the checkbox.
Is it something I can do?
Thanks in advance,
Xavier Deletoille |
2028
|
Tue Oct 31 22:10:11 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Bug report | Windows | V2.6.2-172 | Re: checkbox |
deletoille wrote: | Hello,
I found a small Bug when I create an entry. I activate a checkbox (attachement1) but when I upload a file, the activation disappears (attachement 2). I have to activate again the checkbox.
Is it something I can do?
Thanks in advance,
Xavier Deletoille |
Steve Jones wrote: |
Xavier, your version number does not indicate the full SVN (it is cutoff at '172') but your screenshot indicates 'SVN1723'. This is an identified problem and looks to be fixed in SVN1740. I have verified with the checkbox "Suppress Email Notification" -- it likely effects all checkboxes.
|
|
2030
|
Thu Nov 2 08:41:34 2006 |
| deletoille | xavier.deletoille@synchrotron-soleil.fr | Bug report | Windows | V2.6.2-172 | Re: checkbox |
Steve Jones wrote: |
deletoille wrote: | Hello,
I found a small Bug when I create an entry. I activate a checkbox (attachement1) but when I upload a file, the activation disappears (attachement 2). I have to activate again the checkbox.
Is it something I can do?
Thanks in advance,
Xavier Deletoille |
Steve Jones wrote: |
Xavier, your version number does not indicate the full SVN (it is cutoff at '172') but your screenshot indicates 'SVN1723'. This is an identified problem and looks to be fixed in SVN1740. I have verified with the checkbox "Suppress Email Notification" -- it likely effects all checkboxes.
|
|
OK ,
sorry for the version number. My SVN numbers is 1723 like in screenshot.
I'm waiting SVN1740 .
thanks in advance |
2049
|
Wed Nov 8 07:59:01 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | V2.6.2-172 | Re: checkbox |
deletoille wrote: | I found a small Bug when I create an entry. I activate a checkbox (attachement1) but when I upload a file, the activation disappears (attachement 2). I have to activate again the checkbox.
Is it something I can do? |
I tried with V2.6.2-1741 and the problem was not there. It was fixed some time ago, so it should have worked in 1723 as well. Can you try the minimal example coming with the distribution, just by adding one MOptions attribute, like:
[global]
port = 8080
[demo]
Attributes = Author, Type
MOptions Type = Routine, Software Installation, Problem Fixed, Configuration, Other
and see if it work there? If it works correctly there but not with your config file, please send me your config file and I will try to reproduce the problem. |