ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
227
|
Wed Feb 19 09:37:30 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | | | | Re: Participation on development of ELOG | > We are interested in using your ELOG (which we consider to be a wonderful
> application) even more. We would like to make a few adaptations in your
> source code, above all to add some functionality that we are missing.
>
> I was wondering if there is a way we could coordinate the development
> together. For instance, would it be of your interest to receive the code
> adaptations we do and implement it in your future releases?
Sure, I'm very interested in those and ready to merge it into the main
development tree.
- Stefan |
228
|
Wed Feb 19 09:47:32 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Postdating the Entry Date | > Is is possible to postdate the Entry Date for an entry?
>
> The documentation lists the ability to forward date an entry, but I don't
> see any ability to backdate an entry (edit the date to a date in the past).
>
> Given that the entry date is part of the logbook entry file structure, it
> wasn't obvious how to make this change.
The date is part of the logbook entry file structure because it's considered
as a "stamp" which cannot be changed, so to document the real date when the
message was written. In some installations this is very important.
If you need to change the date more freely, I would recommend to add another
attribute which can be changed at will. Up to now this has to be a string
variable so users have to make sure to enter the date in proper format, but
you can prepopulate that with the current date like:
Attributes = Author, ..., Real date
Preset Real date = $date
This way the current date occurs in that field, but can be changed
(backdated).
Note that the entry date can be changed directly in the YYMMDDa.log files in
the data directory, if one has write access there and the elogd daemon is not
running. |
229
|
Wed Feb 19 09:54:38 2003 |
| Tomas Rudolf | tomas@mba.be | | | | Re: Participation on development of ELOG | > > We are interested in using your ELOG (which we consider to be a wonderful
> > application) even more. We would like to make a few adaptations in your
> > source code, above all to add some functionality that we are missing.
> >
> > I was wondering if there is a way we could coordinate the development
> > together. For instance, would it be of your interest to receive the code
> > adaptations we do and implement it in your future releases?
>
> Sure, I'm very interested in those and ready to merge it into the main
> development tree.
>
> - Stefan
Thanx for your quick answer.
I'll keep you updated as we move ahead with the development.
Tomas |
230
|
Wed Feb 19 13:28:17 2003 |
| Tomas Rudolf | tomas@mba.be | Question | | | Email notification | Hi Stefan,
I have a question concerning the Email notification in ELOG.
I have been testing various combinations of the parameters you describe in
your documentation :
Email <attribute> <value> = <list>
Use Email Subject = <string>
Use Email From = <string>
Omit Email To = 0|1
Suppress Email to users = 0|1
And I have encountered a problem using the Email <attribute> <value> =
<list>. While this works fine for me when the <attribute> is of a type
textfield, Options or ROptions, I don't seem to be able to have it working
for the MOptions <attribute> = <list>.
The aim is to have an email notification sent only to selected people
instead of everybody. I was hoping that this would work :
[MyLogBook]
MOptions Message_To = NB,LW,EC,MD,CD,TV,AH,TR,JS
...
...
Suppress Email to users = 1
Email Message_To TR = tomas@mba.be
Email Message_To EC = etienne@mba.be
...
...
Of course, the tricky part is that it is "multiple choice" so any
combination of recipients is possible.
Am I missing something?
Thanx for any ideas how to solve this,
Tomas |
231
|
Wed Feb 19 14:48:56 2003 |
| Heiko Scheit | h.scheit@mpi-hd.mpg.de | Comment | | | Re: Participation on development of ELOG | > > We are interested in using your ELOG (which we consider to be a wonderful
> > application) even more. We would like to make a few adaptations in your
> > source code, above all to add some functionality that we are missing.
> >
> > I was wondering if there is a way we could coordinate the development
> > together. For instance, would it be of your interest to receive the code
> > adaptations we do and implement it in your future releases?
>
> Sure, I'm very interested in those and ready to merge it into the main
> development tree.
>
> - Stefan
I think it is very good to include this in elog, but,
since this is also a big security risk (especially if people are
running elogd as root) I would suggest a compile time option to
enable this, like: gcc... -DALLOW_SCRIPT ...
The default should be that it is disabled.
Maybe one should only allow it if the user running elogd is NOT root.
Heiko |
232
|
Mon Feb 24 09:23:39 2003 |
| Tomas Rudolf | tomas@mba.be | Bug report | | | Themes BUG ? | Hi,
We prepared a customized theme to use with ELOG. It's called for example
my_theme and is situated in the THEMES directory (together with the DEFAULT
theme).
I defined the my_theme the global theme for ELOG:
[global]
Theme = my_theme
And it works fine for all the logbook in ELOG. However. The login screen
and the main menu screen (the one with list of logbooks and # of entries)
still takes the DEFAULT theme.
If I change the my_theme name to default then everything works correctly
(logon + main menu + all logbooks have the desired look).
Is the DEFAULT theme somehow hardcoded for the login screen and the main
menu ?
Thanx for your answer
Tomas Rudolf |
233
|
Mon Feb 24 13:20:19 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | | | | ELOG source code from CVS | To obtain the newest source code of ELOG, go to the CVS repository at
http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/src
It contains usually the newest bug fixes, which will show up in the next
realease. On the other hand it can also contain some new features, which
are not yet fully tested, so care should be taken when using it. The
revision comments usually explain what is new in that revision. |
234
|
Mon Feb 24 13:22:06 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | | | Re: Themes BUG ? | > Is the DEFAULT theme somehow hardcoded for the login screen and the main
> menu ?
Yes, this was in and certainly is not correct. So I fixed it, the new code
can be obtained vom CVS (see elog:233). |
|