Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 794 of 796  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OSup ELOG Version Subject
  69715   Mon Jan 8 15:56:40 2024 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionWindowsELOG V3.1.3-a38Re: Maximum number of attributes

In my case, I had a number of attributes which had a varied prefix.  For example, "progressed" , which could have no prefix, or prefix "I", "To be", "Strongly", "Seriously"... and that was true (the same prefixes, or at least many of them) for a number of attributes.  Splitting them into two groups, the prefixes and the action, allowed me to gain more actual attributes without having to recompile.  Suitable change in the elog config file will also make this easy to follow in how the entries are shown in threaded or full display modes.  In your case suffixes may be better, but I hope you get the point.

Although I have done a (linux) recompile in the past, v2.9 something, 120 attributes seemed not to affect things.

Dr Marta Divall wrote:

Dear Stefan,

 Thansk for the super fast response! To keep the stability of the system we will look for a different solution then. 

Best,

Marta

Stefan Ritt wrote:

You would have to change the elogd.c code and recompile. At some point you wlll however get crash of elogd with a stack overflow. If you need more than 100 attributes, it becomes anyhow hard to manage, so I would suggest other ways, like adding iformation to the text body etc.

Best,
Stefan

Dr Marta Divall wrote:

The maximum number or attributes is 100.

Is it possible to increase this?

Thanks!

 

 

 

  69716   Mon Jan 8 16:18:45 2024 Reply Dr Marta Divallmarta.divall@epfl.chQuestionWindowsELOG V3.1.3-a38Re: Maximum number of attributes

To explain the problem, we have silicon chip designs, which we log with an indentifyier, which is the attribute for easy search, as we want to follow their progress from design thorugh fabrication to testing, involving many people. They are called D_001; D_099...you get it. We have reached the 100, but maybe it is the est just to create an archive after each 100 design and make a new tab/logbook. Any other suggestions are of course welcome. 

David Pilgram wrote:

In my case, I had a number of attributes which had a varied prefix.  For example, "progressed" , which could have no prefix, or prefix "I", "To be", "Strongly", "Seriously"... and that was true (the same prefixes, or at least many of them) for a number of attributes.  Splitting them into two groups, the prefixes and the action, allowed me to gain more actual attributes without having to recompile.  Suitable change in the elog config file will also make this easy to follow in how the entries are shown in threaded or full display modes.  In your case suffixes may be better, but I hope you get the point.

Although I have done a (linux) recompile in the past, v2.9 something, 120 attributes seemed not to affect things.

Dr Marta Divall wrote:

Dear Stefan,

 Thansk for the super fast response! To keep the stability of the system we will look for a different solution then. 

Best,

Marta

Stefan Ritt wrote:

You would have to change the elogd.c code and recompile. At some point you wlll however get crash of elogd with a stack overflow. If you need more than 100 attributes, it becomes anyhow hard to manage, so I would suggest other ways, like adding iformation to the text body etc.

Best,
Stefan

Dr Marta Divall wrote:

The maximum number or attributes is 100.

Is it possible to increase this?

Thanks!

 

 

 

 

  69717   Mon Jan 8 16:25:05 2024 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindowsELOG V3.1.3-a38Re: Maximum number of attributes

Why don't you simply create a single attribute "identifier", which then gets a value D_001, ..., D_xxx. You can still use the D_xxx in full text search.

Stefan

Dr Marta Divall wrote:

To explain the problem, we have silicon chip designs, which we log with an indentifyier, which is the attribute for easy search, as we want to follow their progress from design thorugh fabrication to testing, involving many people. They are called D_001; D_099...you get it. We have reached the 100, but maybe it is the est just to create an archive after each 100 design and make a new tab/logbook. Any other suggestions are of course welcome. 

David Pilgram wrote:

In my case, I had a number of attributes which had a varied prefix.  For example, "progressed" , which could have no prefix, or prefix "I", "To be", "Strongly", "Seriously"... and that was true (the same prefixes, or at least many of them) for a number of attributes.  Splitting them into two groups, the prefixes and the action, allowed me to gain more actual attributes without having to recompile.  Suitable change in the elog config file will also make this easy to follow in how the entries are shown in threaded or full display modes.  In your case suffixes may be better, but I hope you get the point.

Although I have done a (linux) recompile in the past, v2.9 something, 120 attributes seemed not to affect things.

Dr Marta Divall wrote:

Dear Stefan,

 Thansk for the super fast response! To keep the stability of the system we will look for a different solution then. 

Best,

Marta

Stefan Ritt wrote:

You would have to change the elogd.c code and recompile. At some point you wlll however get crash of elogd with a stack overflow. If you need more than 100 attributes, it becomes anyhow hard to manage, so I would suggest other ways, like adding iformation to the text body etc.

Best,
Stefan

Dr Marta Divall wrote:

The maximum number or attributes is 100.

Is it possible to increase this?

Thanks!

 

 

 

 

 

  69718   Mon Jan 8 17:30:42 2024 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionWindowsELOG V3.1.3-a38Re: Maximum number of attributes

Or what about the "ticket number" feature?  Every new entry  thread (sorry, confusing terminology on my part) would increment the ticket number by one, and there is no limit as far as I am aware.  This is all explained in the elogd configuration documentation.  

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Why don't you simply create a single attribute "identifier", which then gets a value D_001, ..., D_xxx. You can still use the D_xxx in full text search.

Stefan

Dr Marta Divall wrote:

To explain the problem, we have silicon chip designs, which we log with an indentifyier, which is the attribute for easy search, as we want to follow their progress from design thorugh fabrication to testing, involving many people. They are called D_001; D_099...you get it. We have reached the 100, but maybe it is the est just to create an archive after each 100 design and make a new tab/logbook. Any other suggestions are of course welcome. 

David Pilgram wrote:

In my case, I had a number of attributes which had a varied prefix.  For example, "progressed" , which could have no prefix, or prefix "I", "To be", "Strongly", "Seriously"... and that was true (the same prefixes, or at least many of them) for a number of attributes.  Splitting them into two groups, the prefixes and the action, allowed me to gain more actual attributes without having to recompile.  Suitable change in the elog config file will also make this easy to follow in how the entries are shown in threaded or full display modes.  In your case suffixes may be better, but I hope you get the point.

Although I have done a (linux) recompile in the past, v2.9 something, 120 attributes seemed not to affect things.

Dr Marta Divall wrote:

Dear Stefan,

 Thansk for the super fast response! To keep the stability of the system we will look for a different solution then. 

Best,

Marta

Stefan Ritt wrote:

You would have to change the elogd.c code and recompile. At some point you wlll however get crash of elogd with a stack overflow. If you need more than 100 attributes, it becomes anyhow hard to manage, so I would suggest other ways, like adding iformation to the text body etc.

Best,
Stefan

Dr Marta Divall wrote:

The maximum number or attributes is 100.

Is it possible to increase this?

Thanks!

 

 

 

 

 

 

  69719   Mon Jan 8 21:08:43 2024 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionWindowsELOG V3.1.3-a38Re: Maximum number of attributes

As for my suggestion earlier, now I'm at my computer with working elog. I think that the following four lines (three I guess already there but need alteration for this) need to appear in your elogd.conf file.  The first three should also include any other thing you need to display etc.  I've cut this down to the bear bones, and ... means anything else you want to add. 

Attributes = Die, Organisation, ...
List display = Die, Organisation. ...
Thread display = $Die: $Organisation ...
Preset Die = D_#####

Now the first time you run this, it will give D_00001.  You can edit that to D_00100 and it will increment from there.  You may wish to have two types of user, those who can start a new thread, such as yourself, and others who can contribute but not start a new thread / new Die discussion.

Now it may be that the attribute name you gave D_001 etc can be used where I have used "Die" here, which would appear to give a seemless transition. and perhaps without the need of editing the first new thread.

I have tried these as changes to an existing logbook on my system. and they appeared to work fine. but in my case as a single user, I could always change the Die number, a feature I guess you do not want.  I guess there is a way in the config file, but I'm running out of steam for today.  David.

David Pilgram wrote:

Or what about the "ticket number" feature?  Every new entry  thread (sorry, confusing terminology on my part) would increment the ticket number by one, and there is no limit as far as I am aware.  This is all explained in the elogd configuration documentation.  

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Why don't you simply create a single attribute "identifier", which then gets a value D_001, ..., D_xxx. You can still use the D_xxx in full text search.

Stefan

Dr Marta Divall wrote:

To explain the problem, we have silicon chip designs, which we log with an indentifyier, which is the attribute for easy search, as we want to follow their progress from design thorugh fabrication to testing, involving many people. They are called D_001; D_099...you get it. We have reached the 100, but maybe it is the est just to create an archive after each 100 design and make a new tab/logbook. Any other suggestions are of course welcome. 

David Pilgram wrote:

In my case, I had a number of attributes which had a varied prefix.  For example, "progressed" , which could have no prefix, or prefix "I", "To be", "Strongly", "Seriously"... and that was true (the same prefixes, or at least many of them) for a number of attributes.  Splitting them into two groups, the prefixes and the action, allowed me to gain more actual attributes without having to recompile.  Suitable change in the elog config file will also make this easy to follow in how the entries are shown in threaded or full display modes.  In your case suffixes may be better, but I hope you get the point.

Although I have done a (linux) recompile in the past, v2.9 something, 120 attributes seemed not to affect things.

Dr Marta Divall wrote:

Dear Stefan,

 Thansk for the super fast response! To keep the stability of the system we will look for a different solution then. 

Best,

Marta

Stefan Ritt wrote:

You would have to change the elogd.c code and recompile. At some point you wlll however get crash of elogd with a stack overflow. If you need more than 100 attributes, it becomes anyhow hard to manage, so I would suggest other ways, like adding iformation to the text body etc.

Best,
Stefan

Dr Marta Divall wrote:

The maximum number or attributes is 100.

Is it possible to increase this?

Thanks!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  69753   Thu Mar 7 12:22:54 2024 Question iman haddadiman.haddad@espci.frQuestionWindowsV3.1.4-2e1708b5Change an entry to a reply for an other entry

Hi Everybody,

I import a logbook from csv file, with a number for laboratory's notebook, which can be use by multiple intern. I'd like to add a "reply to" when the number is the same, it's like a "move to" but in the same logbook.

Thanks in advance for your help

  69760   Tue Mar 12 09:20:14 2024 Angy Celeste Torkzabantorkzaban@iqo.uni-hannover.deBug reportWindowsELOG V3.1.3-793Record date isn't set to current date when replying to elogs

Hello,

I started using the record date feature in one logbook, since we plan to copy over old entries Joplin/Onenote. When starting a new entry, I see that the record date is automatically set to the current date, but when I reply to an elog, the record date is automatically set to the record date of the elog I'm replying to. Is there a way to fix this?

 

  69782   Mon Apr 15 17:50:20 2024 Reply Stefan RittHastefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportWindowsELOG V3.1.3-793Re: Record date isn't set to current date when replying to elogs

Have you tried the config option "Preset on reply <attribute> = $date". On a reply, the <attribute> will be preset with the current date.

Stefan

Celeste Torkzaban wrote:

Hello,

I started using the record date feature in one logbook, since we plan to copy over old entries Joplin/Onenote. When starting a new entry, I see that the record date is automatically set to the current date, but when I reply to an elog, the record date is automatically set to the record date of the elog I'm replying to. Is there a way to fix this?

 

 

ELOG V3.1.5-fe60aaf