ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
1609
|
Thu Jan 19 15:02:38 2006 |
| Giorgio Croci Candiani | g.crocic@libero.it | Bug report | | 2.6.1 | Access to global configuration in v2.6.1 |
Hi,
I just installed v.2.6.1 coming from the previous 2.6.0 (on Win2000)
When I access the "configuration" function from a logbook, in the cfg page I only see two buttons in the header
(save or cancel); in the previous version I saw more buttons there ("global config", "create new logbook" and so
on), so here I'm unable to access global configuration or logbook management (except for current logbook options).
I am logged in as admin (actually I have a single-user configuration, thus no particular users defined).
I hope this report may be helpful, and not just being caused by a misunderstanding on my side ;)
Thanks
GiorgioCC |
67731
|
Tue Dec 16 01:15:40 2014 |
| Eric Quintero | ericq@caltech.edu | Bug report | Linux | 2.8.1 | Strange Behavior in "Find" Function |
Hi all,
We've been happily using ELOG for years, but ran into an odd problem when replacing the old Solaris server that ran the ELOG with a newer box running Ubuntu.
Basically, when I try to search the log, the URL seems to be malformed. I.e. the form produces the query string:
?mode=summvry&reverse=0&reverse=1&npp=35&m&y&Authorthor=ericq
Instead of a functional one like:
?mode=summary&reverse=1&npp=35&Author=ericq
We're running v2.8.1, since we like using the global write password mode; our log is viewable here: http://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8080 Any ideas what could've gone wrong? Installation was pretty straightforward, the code compiled happily on the ubuntu machine.
Incidentally, I notice this logbook is running V3, using CKeditor. Any hints when these might be available for public use?
Thanks! |
68080
|
Wed Aug 12 23:44:16 2015 |
| Eric Quintero | ericq@caltech.edu | Question | All | 3.0.0-70b274b | Show attachments = 0 |
I have "Show attachments = 0" set in [global], but attachments are shown in the "Full" view. Is this the intended behavior? Looking at individual entries correctly hides the attachments.
We use inline images often, so when an attachement is shown at the bottom of a post it is effectively a duplicate, which clutters things up a bit. |
59
|
Mon Jul 8 22:50:16 2002 |
| Scott Fenstermacher | dsfens@wm.edu | Question | | | Where can I get more information on the config file |
Where can I get more information about the config and themes file. I
downloaded the latest version (2.0.4) and the config file docs seem out of
date. I would like to get the icons working as well as getting the email to
work. The demo page at the elog home site shows both but I cannot find ant
references to the icons. |
69838
|
Tue Nov 5 15:44:57 2024 |
| Dominic | dominic@nowhere.co | Bug report | Linux | 3fb85fa6 | Re: Crash on attachment upload |
Does this issue occur only on Ubuntu systems? as I've experienced the same on my Raspberry Pi 5 running Ubuntu too ...
jaro mrazek wrote: |
I am on ubuntu 24.04.1, I needed to git clone, make and make install,
HEAD is 3fb85fa6 - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Fixed compiler warning (3 weeks ago)
It crashes on every attachment: thank you. Jaro
root@vaio:~# systemctl status elogd
× elogd.service - The ELOG Server
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/elogd.service; enabled; preset: ena>
Active: failed (Result: core-dump) since Thu 2024-09-12 10:39:23 CEST; 3s a>
Duration: 5.402s
Docs: man:elogd(8)
man:elog(8)
Process: 724285 ExecStart=/usr/local/sbin/elogd -D -c /usr/local/elog/elogd.>
Main PID: 724286 (code=dumped, signal=ABRT)
CPU: 32ms
Sep 12 10:39:18 vaio systemd[1]: Starting elogd.service - The ELOG Server...
Sep 12 10:39:18 vaio elogd[724286]: elogd 3.1.5 built Sep 11 2024, 17:02:36
Sep 12 10:39:18 vaio elogd[724286]: revision 3fb85fa6
Sep 12 10:39:18 vaio elogd[724286]: File "/var/run/elogd.pid" exists, overwritin>
Sep 12 10:39:18 vaio systemd[1]: Started elogd.service - The ELOG Server.
Sep 12 10:39:18 vaio elogd[724286]: CKeditor detected
Sep 12 10:39:18 vaio elogd[724286]: ImageMagick detected
Sep 12 10:39:18 vaio elogd[724286]: Server listening on port 9000 ...
Sep 12 10:39:23 vaio systemd[1]: elogd.service: Main process exited, code=dumped>
Sep 12 10:39:23 vaio systemd[1]: elogd.service: Failed with result 'core-dump'.
root@vaio:~# systemctl restart elogd
|
|
69839
|
Tue Nov 5 15:51:26 2024 |
| Dominic | dominic@nowhere.co | Bug report | Linux | Windows | Mac OSX | ELOG V3.1.5 | Re: Equation Editor does not work |
is there any update on this bug? Has anyone else observed the same problem?
Dominic wrote: |
Hi!
I am not sure if this is a know issue: it seems that the equation editor does not work anymore. Is there any fix or alternative method to type latex formula in the log?
Thank you!
|
|
69316
|
Wed Mar 10 17:30:23 2021 |
| Stefan Ritt | do stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | V3.1.4-80633ba | Re: Date conversion |
Do you actually need to convert the date into the internal format? Why not keeping simply the full string YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM. If the use is disciplined enough to always use the correct format, there should be no issue. I invented the datetime format to "force" all date/time inputs to have the correct format. If you have a proper YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM format, even sorting (now by string) should work correctly.
Martin Neumann wrote: |
Hi,
I am trying to figure out how ELOG works and I have a problem.
I have one datetime attribute, where I want the user to be able to enter the time in ISO8601 format (YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM) instead of the buttons.
How do I manage that this input is converted correctly into the internal format?
I tried adding a hidden locked Attribute called IntDate and use "Subst IntDate = $start" but the result is dates in 1970, even though I have set the Time Format to "%F %H:%M"
|
|
77
|
Wed Jul 17 23:46:01 2002 |
| d. nettles | dnettle@lsu.edu | Question | | | inserting pictures into a post |
does elog have a way of inserting pictures into a post other than including
them as an attachment? i can put a picture in using html text, but this
method only works if the picture is stored on the local server. anyone
placing a post from a remote machine cannot include a picture off of their
machine.
any help?
thanks. |