| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
65894
|
Mon Jun 2 12:17:53 2008 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | | Re: using elog client in secure mode |
| Luc Goossens wrote: |
|
I am trying to enter a log record in secure mode into a log book hosted on an apache server (v2.7.2).
[atlt0dev@voatlas04]~% elog -v -s -h prod-grid-logger.cern.ch -p 443 -u myuser -w mypassword -d elog -l "ATLAS+Tier0+Operations+Logbook" -a Subject=foobar
|
Your problem is the wrong password parameter. The "-w" password is only if a write password is defined in the config file. If the user level access is chosen however, you have to specify the username/password pair only separated by a blank such as in
elog ... -u myuser mypwassword ...
|
|
67745
|
Mon Jan 12 11:24:00 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.2-2455 | Re: using a predefined format with predefined informations that an user should fill at each run of data | In ELOG you can define "attributes", so take one attribute for each informaiton you need. The flag these attributes as required via "Required attributes = ...". If you only want this attributes for certain occations (like data taking in your case), you can either do a separato logbook for data taking, or use "conditional attributes" to make these attributes only show up for data taking.
/Stefan
| Iolanda Matea wrote: |
|
Hello!
I was wondering if it is possible (and how) to define a template (something equivalent to an excel table with some required informations to be filled) that opens each time one wants to make a new entry of a given type, e.g., I want this template to open only when the informations concern data taking.
I hope I am sufficiently clear ...
Thank you,
I.M.
|
|
|
416
|
Sun Jul 27 16:09:09 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.3.9 | Re: using = or <> or AND as part of a filter ?? | > Is this possible? If so, could you provide an example:
>
> I'm trying to find a way that when you do a search, that you can filter
> entries using ( = , <>, AND) on one or more attributes.
> ex: Find all workstations for this subnet, but exclude a particular one.
> Thats the basic idea.
>
> Can it be done? If so, how?
No, it cannot be done right now, but it's on the wishlist since some time.
So I added your vote there. |
|
1255
|
Mon Jul 11 12:40:13 2005 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | | Re: userlist multiple select |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | Here I am again 
My goal is to put a "Co-Authors" Attribute in my logbook, giving the possibility to other people in the control room to have credits about an entry... I added a "Co-Author" attribute, but It shold permit a "multliple" selection (a checkbox is not good) ... the perfect solution would be to add the attribute "multiple" to the <select> tag, and filling the elog Attribute value with a comma separated list of the selections ...
tnx in advance |
Have you tried MOptions ... which gives you check boxes where more than one can be selected?
I presume you have, but you really would prefer a multi-selection box instead of multiple check boxes  . Well, let's make a deal: if you explain everybody how to do a selection in a multi-select box (with all the Shift-Click, CTRL-Click, and this under different operating systems), I will implement it  |
|
1258
|
Mon Jul 11 14:35:00 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Request | All | | Re: userlist multiple select |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | Here I am again
My goal is to put a "Co-Authors" Attribute in my logbook, giving the possibility to other people in the control room to have credits about an entry... I added a "Co-Author" attribute, but It shold permit a "multliple" selection (a checkbox is not good) ... the perfect solution would be to add the attribute "multiple" to the <select> tag, and filling the elog Attribute value with a comma separated list of the selections ...
tnx in advance |
Have you tried MOptions ... which gives you check boxes where more than one can be selected?
I presume you have, but you really would prefer a multi-selection box instead of multiple check boxes . Well, let's make a deal: if you explain everybody how to do a selection in a multi-select box (with all the Shift-Click, CTRL-Click, and this under different operating systems), I will implement it |
a multiple selection box it's a standard web tool .. if one is not able to use its browser is not an elog problem IMHO 
My request is becouse having a number of user (say 20) makes the checkbox solution very very nasty .. again, it's a choice you give to the smart user .. others simply will not notice any change in elog |
|
1261
|
Tue Jul 12 15:19:07 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | | Re: userlist multiple select |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | | a multiple selection box it's a standard web tool .. if one is not able to use its browser is not an elog problem IMHO |
Really? Can you point me to a common web site using this? I would really like to see how other people use this.
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | | My request is becouse having a number of user (say 20) makes the checkbox solution very very nasty .. again, it's a choice you give to the smart user .. others simply will not notice any change in elog |
Ok, I put it on my wishlist. If more than one person asks for this, I will implement it. Unfortunately it's not only putting a multiple into the HTML page, it's also a different way how multiple selections are passed in the POST form and their decoding, so it will be an hour or two of work for me. |
|
1263
|
Wed Jul 13 10:12:38 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Request | All | | Re: userlist multiple select |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | | a multiple selection box it's a standard web tool .. if one is not able to use its browser is not an elog problem IMHO |
Really? Can you point me to a common web site using this? I would really like to see how other people use this.
|
I can't remember just now a web site using it .. what I mean is that "multiple" attribute for the "select" tag is a standard for the web (it's not an IE extension or so on ..) so every web browser implements it.
It's normally used, for example, when you fill a form describing your attitudes, here you can often choose from a select box a number of interest you are concerded.. but it is only an example
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | | My request is becouse having a number of user (say 20) makes the checkbox solution very very nasty .. again, it's a choice you give to the smart user .. others simply will not notice any change in elog |
Ok, I put it on my wishlist. If more than one person asks for this, I will implement it. Unfortunately it's not only putting a multiple into the HTML page, it's also a different way how multiple selections are passed in the POST form and their decoding, so it will be an hour or two of work for me. |
Yes I know, uhm... if you point me to the right piece of code to be adjusted I can see if I'll be able to do the job |
|
69725
|
Wed Jan 24 14:50:21 2024 |
| Frank Heyroth | heyroth (at) cmat.uni-halle.de | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.5-1 | Re: user change under webserver authentication not recognized | I found the reason of the bug:
In line 27441 of elogd.cxx the http_user is overwritten by the user saved in the sid_ array as a sideeffect of the sid_check function:
sid_check(getparam("sid"), http_user)
It can solved by changing elogd.cxx @ line 27441
27441c27441,27446
< if (!sid_check(getparam("sid"), http_user)) { /* if we don't have a sid yet, set it */
---
> i=sid_check(getparam("sid"), thumb_name);
> if (i && strcmp(http_user,thumb_name)!=0) { /* user changed */
> sid_remove(getparam("sid"));
> i=FALSE;
> }
> if (!i) { /* if we don't have a sid yet, set it */
Remark: I have used the variables i & thumb_name of the function in a local context. |
|