Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Feb 12 17:40:55 2005
|
I added ths missing tags. The validator at least does not complain any more. |
Re: [patch]: fixed wrong extention check, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Feb 12 17:45:39 2005
|
> current version uses strstr() to check if the file has the expected ascii
> text extension ... this is buggy becouse this way a file named
> ".txt_hidden_file" or "foo.config.dat" are both seen as .txt files.
|
[patch] Re: images attached shown as inline , posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Feb 12 17:48:51 2005
|
Are you sure that this does not stretch small images? Please see elog:931
> two new elog.conf parameters are defined:
|
Re: MIME encoding of mail?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Feb 12 18:00:48 2005
|
What you can try is to debug the communication between elogd and the SMTP
server. Just turn on logging via
|
Re: Help with configuration newbie, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Feb 12 20:11:48 2005
|
> 1. When replying to another reply in a thread, the author_name attribute is
> not substitued (as desired). Since this is a mandatory field, we are not
> able to send the reply message. However, reply to the originial message
|
Re: Help with configuration newbie, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sun Feb 13 16:43:05 2005
|
> For me, when I put the Category in the fixed attributes for reply, I see the
> Category but when I actually try to send the message - it says Category not
> entered. I am sure I am doing something very stupid. Please help.
|
Re: ELOG Command Line Utility, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sun Feb 13 17:21:19 2005
|
> I am trying to use the command line utility elog. Some of the attributes
> that I have setup are multiple options. When I run the command line
> utility to create a new message, any attribute that is setup with multiple
|
ELOG security vulnerability fixed, IMPORTANT!!!!, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 14 12:36:30 2005
|
Dear ELOG users,
It has been brought to my attention that ELOG has a vulnerability through
|