ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
Text |
 |
68800
|
Tue May 15 10:35:32 2018 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.2 | Re: about shiftcheck | An attribute is similar to a variable.
Do you know any programming language that
allows to start a variable with a digit? |
|
68799
|
Tue May 15 04:41:23 2018 |
| Xuan Wu | wux@ihep.ac.cn | Question | Linux | 3.1.2 | about shiftcheck | Hi all,
I try to implement a shift check
list for our facility. The attributes called |
  |
68798
|
Tue May 8 16:17:28 2018 |
| Joseph McKenna | joseph.mckenna@cern.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries | Thank you all for your kind responses.
Please consider this thread resolved: no
bug in elog |
|
68797
|
Mon May 7 18:10:20 2018 |
| Chris Rasmussen | chris.rasmussen@cern.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries | ah yes, that was a helpful clue. Our elogd.cfg
file led me to a .js file which redefines
the ID to the elog:SequencerEvents/XXXXX |
|
68796
|
Mon May 7 14:24:18 2018 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries | As Andreas said we have to reproduce the
problem. What is special in your case is
the elog:SequencerEvents/XXXXX. |
|
68795
|
Sat May 5 20:55:23 2018 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries | Well, in my example the ID link worked
just fine.
There could be a string length |
|
68794
|
Sat May 5 11:22:50 2018 |
| Chris Rasmussen | chris.rasmussen@cern.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries | Hi Andreas, I'm working on the same
experiment as Joseph who submitted the bug
report. |
 |
68793
|
Fri May 4 16:05:32 2018 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries | I am not sure I understand your bug report.
I can easily create IDs greater
than 100'000 (see attached picture), |
|