Problems with beta 3 (Follow-on to CVS/XML msg 1296), posted by PJ Meyer on Wed Jul 27 02:15:59 2005
|
Ok downloaded and installed beta 3
can get xml and cvs with dates as date! verrry haaapppppy! :)
|
Re: Problems with beta 3 (Follow-on to CVS/XML msg 1296), posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 27 09:39:47 2005
|
[quote="PJ Meyer"]but something happened to the css.
i'm getting white background and no icons anywhere.
|
|
Re: Problems with beta 3 (Follow-on to CVS/XML msg 1296), posted by PJ Meyer on Thu Jul 28 03:08:19 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="PJ Meyer"]but something happened to the css.
i'm getting white background and no icons anywhere.
|
|
Resolution (i think) - Re: Problems with beta 3 (Follow-on to CVS/XML msg 1296), posted by PJ Meyer on Thu Jul 28 04:29:35 2005
|
[quote="PJ Meyer"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="PJ Meyer"]but something happened to the css.
i'm getting white background and no icons anywhere.
|
|
Resolution (i think) - Re: Problems with beta 3 (Follow-on to CVS/XML msg 1296), posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Aug 4 20:35:48 2005
|
[quote="PJ Meyer"]think I figured it out- had to make explict most of the default settings: resource, logbook, url, theme, css and so on.
so this is done.[/quote]
|
|
Response is very slow with beta3, posted by PJ Meyer on Thu Jul 28 04:27:30 2005
|
I finally got 2.60 Beta3 running on my server (explicit statements in cfg for most of the defaults)
Now I'm seeing a veerrry slooooow response time - over 3 minutes to open a logbook vs 10 sec in 2.54
|
|
Re: Response is very slow with beta3, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Aug 3 13:01:17 2005
|
[quote="PJ Meyer"]I finally got 2.60 Beta3 running on my server (explicit statements in cfg for most of the defaults)
Now I'm seeing a veerrry slooooow response time - over 3 minutes to open a logbook vs 10 sec in 2.54
|
|
Re: Response is very slow with beta3, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Aug 3 22:44:43 2005
|
[quote="Emiliano Gabrielli"]for every image elog has to serve one can see something similar to the above ... lot of time lost in selects.. then a lot of
data (serving an image I suppose), then a lot of time in select again and again ... untill everything is sent, in a couple of minutes or more ;-(
|
|
Re: Response is very slow with beta3, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Aug 4 11:19:53 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Emiliano Gabrielli"]for every image elog has to serve one can see something similar to the above ... lot of time lost in selects..
then a lot of data (serving an image I suppose), then a lot of time in select again and again ... untill everything is sent, in a couple of minutes or
more ;-(
|
Summary page, posted by Dinesh Bapat on Mon Jul 25 10:14:27 2005
|
Hi,
This might be a stupid question.
|
|
Re: Summary page, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jul 25 10:24:23 2005
|
[quote="Dinesh Bapat"]But "Summary" page of my e-log continues to display additional column "Text". Kindly advise how to hide this last column.[/quote]
[FONT=courier]Summary lines = 0[/FONT]
|
Re: Summary page, posted by Dinesh Bapat on Mon Aug 1 06:14:41 2005
|
Thank you very much.
|
attribute of type "datetime" sorted incorrectly, posted by Kees Bol on Wed Jul 27 16:46:44 2005 
|
In order to enter different logdates we created the attribute 'Logdate' as follows:
...
|
|
Re: attribute of type "datetime" sorted incorrectly, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 27 21:22:47 2005
|
[quote="Kees Bol"]What goes wrong here?[/quote]
The wrong sorting is a mystery to me. I redid what you have, and entered exactly the same entries, and got following:
|
|
Re: attribute of type "datetime" sorted incorrectly, posted by Kees Bol on Thu Jul 28 09:46:40 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kees Bol"]What goes wrong here?[/quote]
The wrong sorting is a mystery to me. I redid what you have, and entered exactly the same entries, and got following:
|
|
hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Juliana Peng on Wed Jul 20 19:49:21 2005
|
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the great work. We have been using elog for a year as inventory management.
|
|
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 20 23:24:59 2005
|
[quote="Juliana Peng"]but it seems only effective when adding the new entry. All the attributes will show in logbook. Is there a way to hide some of the
attributes? It would be good to let each user to choose what to see what not to see, create their own view. Can you put it on your to-do list or wishlist?[/quote]
|
|
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Juliana Peng on Fri Jul 22 17:21:15 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Juliana Peng"]but it seems only effective when adding the new entry. All the attributes will show in logbook. Is there a way
to hide some of the attributes? It would be good to let each user to choose what to see what not to see, create their own view. Can you put it on your
to-do list or wishlist?[/quote]
|
|
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Juliana Peng on Fri Jul 22 17:54:41 2005
|
[quote="Juliana Peng"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Juliana Peng"]but it seems only effective when adding the new entry. All the attributes will show in
logbook. Is there a way to hide some of the attributes? It would be good to let each user to choose what to see what not to see, create their own view.
Can you put it on your to-do list or wishlist?[/quote]
|
|
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jul 22 22:45:37 2005
|
[quote="Juliana Peng"]Thanks so much. But the new feature seems not working.[/quote]
Are you sure you got the latest CVS version and recompiled correctly?
|
|
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Juliana Peng on Mon Jul 25 22:32:10 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Juliana Peng"]Thanks so much. But the new feature seems not working.[/quote]
Are you sure you got the latest CVS version and recompiled correctly?
|
|
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 26 09:38:07 2005
|
[quote="Juliana Peng"]I downloaded Revision 1.717, replaced the source code with the new elogd.c, then run " dpkg-buildpackage -uc -b"
(debian linux) to build the package. Now after i add a new entry, once I select it I got
"Attachment #1 of entry #0 not found" error[/quote]
|
|
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Juliana Peng on Tue Jul 26 16:44:41 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Juliana Peng"]Thanks so much. But the new feature seems not working.[/quote]
Are you sure you got the latest CVS version and recompiled correctly?
|
|
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 26 16:50:59 2005
|
[quote="Juliana Peng"]Thanks. But what I want is to hide the unwanted attributes at summary view, not just hide them when I click on entry.[/quote]
No you can't do that.
|
|
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Juliana Peng on Tue Jul 26 17:28:31 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Juliana Peng"]Thanks. But what I want is to hide the unwanted attributes at summary view, not just hide them when I click on
entry.[/quote]
|
|
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 26 20:35:45 2005
|
[quote="Juliana Peng"]I may have all the attributes in logbook to keep a full record of all the machine. But for daily use, some of the attibutes we are
not using so often. Too many attributes will make the window so big that can not be hold in one screen which is the reason why I want to hide some of them.
Of course the hidden attributes have data, but those data are rarely used so we'd rather hide them.
|
|
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Juliana Peng on Tue Jul 26 22:05:24 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
Use "list display = <attribute list>" to specify which attributes to show in the listing page. RTFM.[/quote]
|
|
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 27 09:07:17 2005
|
[quote="Juliana Peng"]But is there a way to control to hide or view the attributes? so that we don't need to change the elog.conf file each time.
For example, add a menu "expend" in "Find menu commands", we can click to view all the attributes or just view the attributes defined in "List Display"
|
|
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Juliana Peng on Wed Jul 27 15:49:16 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
In that case I would suggest two separate logbooks, for for SunOS and one for others. This way you can manage two separate sets of attributes.[/quote]
|
|
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 27 15:56:53 2005
|
[quote="Juliana Peng"]We don't want separate logbooks, sorry for the misleading. I was trying to put two request together.[/quote]
I understood you correctly. What I was trying to say is that what you currently request possible with the current version and will not be implemented soon. |
Re: hide attributes when view the logbook, posted by Juliana Peng on Wed Jul 27 16:31:33 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
I understood you correctly. What I was trying to say is that what you currently request possible with the current version and will not be implemented soon.
But you can partly obtain what you want by having two logbooks. Make one logbook which has fewer attributes, and which will receive all SunOS entries. |
|
Restrict Top Groups to logged-in users?, posted by Chris Green on Tue Jul 26 17:57:36 2005
|
Hi,
I'd like to be able to prevent non-logged-in users from seeing what logbooks exist in a top group. Currently it seems that one is only required to log |
|
Re: Restrict Top Groups to logged-in users?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 26 20:32:02 2005
|
[quote="Chris Green"]I'd like to be able to prevent non-logged-in users from seeing what logbooks exist in a top group. Currently it seems that one is only
required to log in once one has chosen a logbook. Is this possible?[/quote]
|
|
Re: Restrict Top Groups to logged-in users?, posted by Chris Green on Tue Jul 26 20:51:10 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Chris Green"]I'd like to be able to prevent non-logged-in users from seeing what logbooks exist in a top group. Currently it
seems that one is only required to log in once one has chosen a logbook. Is this possible?[/quote]
|
|
Re: Restrict Top Groups to logged-in users?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 26 21:11:31 2005
|
[quote="Chris Green"]I already had the "password file = <file>" in the [global <top group>] section but I was still able to see the logbooks in that section.
Moving the password line to [global] and / or setting Show Top Groups = 0 helped. Am I doing something wrong?[/quote]
|
|
Re: Restrict Top Groups to logged-in users?, posted by Chris Green on Tue Jul 26 21:54:39 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
If you move the "password file = <file>" entry around, you can get fooled by stored cookies. So after each modification, make sure to delete all cookies
in your browser.[/quote]
|
|
New and reply pages don't use Page Title, posted by Chris Green on Tue Jul 26 17:41:10 2005
|
Is this intentional, or can it be changed? I'd like every page associated with a particular logbook to use that logbook's page title as at least part of
its own.
|
|
Re: New and reply pages don't use Page Title, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 26 20:23:33 2005
|
[quote="Chris Green"]I'd like every page associated with a particular logbook to use that logbook's page title as at least part of its own.[/quote]
On the list page, you can use "summary page title = <title>". Since this option is misleading, I renamed it to "List page title = <title>". Then I added |
|
Re: New and reply pages don't use Page Title, posted by Chris Green on Tue Jul 26 21:05:26 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]So if you have time and fun doing it, you could restructure the documentation page into some separate pages, to give people a better
overview. Please send the modified pages back to me and I will include them on the web site.[/quote]
I'll try to put this together in the next week or two. Thanks for all your help,
|
|
Can't set Author attribute properly in reply?, posted by Chris Green on Mon Jul 25 23:39:16 2005
|
Hi,
I have two problems:
|
|
Re: Can't set Author attribute properly in reply?, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Jul 26 10:00:34 2005
|
[quote="Chris Green"]Hi,
I have two problems:
|
|
Re: Can't set Author attribute properly in reply?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 26 10:02:58 2005
|
[quote="Chris Green"]1) With the configuration below, I can't set the Author attribute to be the author of the reply. As written, it gives the Author field
as blank. If the Remove on Reply line is removed, it is set to the parent's author. What am I doing wrong?[/quote]
|
|
Re: Can't set Author attribute properly in reply?, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Jul 26 10:49:12 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Chris Green"]1) With the configuration below, I can't set the Author attribute to be the author of the reply. As written, it
gives the Author field as blank. If the Remove on Reply line is removed, it is set to the parent's author. What am I doing wrong?[/quote]
|
|
Re: Can't set Author attribute properly in reply?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 26 10:51:12 2005
|
[quote="Emiliano Gabrielli"]Substitute is the only way I have to be assure it is as I want ...[/quote]
No, that's not true. A
|
|
Re: Can't set Author attribute properly in reply?, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Jul 26 10:55:03 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Emiliano Gabrielli"]Substitute is the only way I have to be assure it is as I want ...[/quote]
No, that's not true. A
|
|
Re: Can't set Author attribute properly in reply?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 26 10:59:45 2005
|
[quote="Emiliano Gabrielli"]The following code will assure that, if the HTML generated by elog would be modified by hand by a malicious user the server
can still preset the author field with the right $long_name? [/quote]
|
|
Re: Can't set Author attribute properly in reply?, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Jul 26 12:02:35 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Emiliano Gabrielli"]The following code will assure that, if the HTML generated by elog would be modified by hand by a malicious
user the server can still preset the author field with the right $long_name? [/quote]
|
|
Re: Can't set Author attribute properly in reply?, posted by Chris Green on Tue Jul 26 17:32:59 2005
|
Thanks for this, gents.
Chris. |