Hi,

I have an ELOG installation on a RedHat linux server, called myserver. I 
can connect to this server with the following entries in the elogd.cfg file:
   [global]
   URL=http://myserver:8080
This works fine. I can log in, select logbooks, edit/create entries etc. 
etc.

However, I want this connection to be encrypted. So I activate stunnel (v4) 
in such a way that stunnel listens to port 8081 and forwards to the 
("remote") port 8080, which is the "original" elog port. I change the URL= 
entry in de elogd.cfg file to URL=https://myserver:8081 in order to use the 
SSL encrypted connection.

At this time, when I connect to https://myserver:8081 I get the 
welcome/login screen, but when I enter the (correct) username and password, 
the elog program does not show the contents of the logbook buts shows the 
loginscreen again. If I enter a wrong username/password, I do get a correct 
error-screen. So it seems that the connection is correct, but there is some 
sort of problem in ELOG. Anyone who can give me a hand here?

That bug has been fixed recently, please update to the newest version.

Newly installed elog gives this response when I try to submit a new record:

New entry cannot be written to directory "./logbooks/Linux/" 
Please check that it exists and elogd has write access

I started the daemon.  I've not yet assigned passwords -- just checking
things out.  How can I create this access to my own directory?

> Newly installed elog gives this response when I try to submit a new record:
> 
> New entry cannot be written to directory "./logbooks/Linux/" 
> Please check that it exists and elogd has write access
> 
> I started the daemon.  I've not yet assigned passwords -- just checking
> things out.  How can I create this access to my own directory?

First, find out under which account the daemon is running. It you account if
you start it interactively, if you installed from the RPM, an account "elog" is
created. Then make sure that the account under which elogd is running has write
access to the ./logbooks/Linux/ directory. One common problem is that people
start the daemon the first time under their account, which causes elogd to
create the logbook directory under the user name. If elogd is later started
under the account "elog" this one of course does not have access to the
directory. A

chown -R elog.elog /usr/local/elog/

issued as root could help in that case. Please replace /usr/local/elog with the
directory where elog is installed.

The upgrade was done by just replacing elogd from 2.5.2 to 2.5.4 from the rpm.

Somehow elogd 2.5.4 treat all users as normal user. When clicking on
"config". All admin users has no "change elogd.cfg" button. Revert back to
2.5.2 OK.

Is there anything I need to change to upgrade other than replaceing elogd?
Clearing the cookies didn't help.

Thanks,
.nait.

> Somehow elogd 2.5.4 treat all users as normal user. When clicking on
> "config". All admin users has no "change elogd.cfg" button. Revert back to
> 2.5.2 OK.
> 
> Is there anything I need to change to upgrade other than replaceing elogd?
> Clearing the cookies didn't help.

The button name has been changed from "change elogd.cfg" to "change config file"
since the file name is now variable (can be changed during compile time). But I
guess this is not your problem.

Can you try with the demo logbook (contained in the distribution). Just add
"password file = ..." and "admin user = ..." to the sample elogd.cfg. If I do that
here, everything works fine. You also can send me your elogd.cfg so I can have a look.

The help text on the website says the following:

"The command Select can be used to select multiple messages for deletion of
moving to other logbooks."

This is not clear but was the intent to indicate that SELECT can be used to
either select multiple log entries for deletion OR for moving to another
logbook?  If the latter, then this does not work if one adds the MOVE TO
menu item to the list.  If the former then the helptext is a little misleading.

Thanks!

> The help text on the website says the following:
> 
> "The command Select can be used to select multiple messages for deletion of
> moving to other logbooks."
> 
> This is not clear but was the intent to indicate that SELECT can be used to
> either select multiple log entries for deletion OR for moving to another
> logbook?  If the latter, then this does not work if one adds the MOVE TO
> menu item to the list.  If the former then the helptext is a little misleading.

SELECT can be used for deletion OR moving OR copying. To enable the copy and move
commands, they have to be present in the "Menu commands" list, like

Menu commands = Back, New, Edit, Delete, Reply, Find, Config, Logout, Move to, Copy
to, Help

I added an appropriate note to the documentation, sorry for the misleading descriptoin.

> > The help text on the website says the following:
> > 
> > "The command Select can be used to select multiple messages for deletion of
> > moving to other logbooks."
> > 
> > This is not clear but was the intent to indicate that SELECT can be used to
> > either select multiple log entries for deletion OR for moving to another
> > logbook?  If the latter, then this does not work if one adds the MOVE TO
> > menu item to the list.  If the former then the helptext is a little misleading.
> 
> SELECT can be used for deletion OR moving OR copying. To enable the copy and move
> commands, they have to be present in the "Menu commands" list, like
> 
> Menu commands = Back, New, Edit, Delete, Reply, Find, Config, Logout, Move to, Copy
> to, Help
> 
> I added an appropriate note to the documentation, sorry for the misleading descriptoin.

Thank you.  I had added the "Move To" and this works at the log entry level (i.e., "Move
To <name>) but in the threaded view one does not get the enumerated list of logbooks.

I'll play around with it a little more before re-posting.  When it didn't work as I
expected I read the docs and ran across the confusing text - so I stopped and asked!

Thanks again.

> Thank you.  I had added the "Move To" and this works at the log entry
level (i.e., "Move
> To <name>) but in the threaded view one does not get the enumerated list
of logbooks.

You get the "Move To" button only after pressing "Select", otherwise it does
not make sense. See attached screendump and config example.

> > Thank you.  I had added the "Move To" and this works at the log entry
> level (i.e., "Move
> > To <name>) but in the threaded view one does not get the enumerated list
> of logbooks.
> 
> You get the "Move To" button only after pressing "Select", otherwise it does
> not make sense. See attached screendump and config example.

Hmmm.  I like the little buttons with the pull-downs for selections. 
Unfortunately, I don't get that.  With a config of:

Find Menu commands = New, Find, Select, Config, Change password, Logout, Help, Admin
Menu commands = Back, New, Edit, Delete, Reply, Find, Move To, Copy To, Config, Help

my screen only shows the "toggle" and "delete" buttons.  Was there a recent rev
that allowed this to happen (I didn't see a comment on this).  

BTW, on a log entry screen, is the appropriate behavior for the "Move To" option
to show multiple "Move To" links (one for each logbook) or should there also be
pulldowns?  

Thanks

> Hmmm.  I like the little buttons with the pull-downs for selections. 
> Unfortunately, I don't get that.  With a config of:
> 
> Find Menu commands = New, Find, Select, Config, Change password, Logout, Help, Admin
> Menu commands = Back, New, Edit, Delete, Reply, Find, Move To, Copy To, Config, Help

Unfortunately menu commands are case sensitive, so you need a "Move to" instead a "Move
To". I changed this in the code so future versions will not be case sensitive any more.

> BTW, on a log entry screen, is the appropriate behavior for the "Move To" option
> to show multiple "Move To" links (one for each logbook) or should there also be
> pulldowns?  

On the log entry screen, only menu links are possible for internal reasons, that's why I
have chosen that display mode. I agree that it can look clumsy if you have many
logbooks, but there is the "move to = <logbook list>" option to restrict the number of
target logbooks.

Hello friends, 

Exist some form to increase limits of items (100) in the Options List



Thanks for any help

> Hello friends, 
> 
> Exist some form to increase limits of items (100) in the Options List
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks for any help

I believe only through an edit of the C code and a recompile, as the values
are set as constants.  I think this might be the line:

#define MAX_N_LIST      100

So, yes, there exists a way and the ease of this way is dependent upon your
comfort level with changing stefan's code.

> > Hello friends, 
> > 
> > Exist some form to increase limits of items (100) in the Options List
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks for any help
> 
> I believe only through an edit of the C code and a recompile, as the values
> are set as constants.  I think this might be the line:
> 
> #define MAX_N_LIST      100
> 
> So, yes, there exists a way and the ease of this way is dependent upon your
> comfort level with changing stefan's code.

Agree. The only potential problem is that if this value becomes too big, you
will get a stack overflow from time to time. So best is experiment yourself a
bit. A avlue of 150 or so should be no problem.

- Stefan

At some point, in the last week or so, I upgraded the debian-unstable
version (r1459-1) of elog.  Now, PostScript files (as attachments) are
displayed (shown in ascii text, instead of just showing the link).  

Is there an option in the elog.cfg to only display certain files (like .gif
or .jpg).

At some point, in the last week or so, I upgraded the debian-unstable
version (r1459-1) of elog.  Now, PostScript files (as attachments) are
displayed (shown in ascii text, instead of just showing the link).  

Is there an option in the elog.cfg to only display certain files (like .gif
or .jpg).

I'm not sure if this is a configuration problem or a bug, but running
v2.5.4subver1.413, elogd runs as user ROOT (UID0) even though the following
is in the elogd.cfd file:

Usr = nobody
Grp = essadm

All other directives added to the cfg file work, so I know eLog is reading
the cfg file.  

The elogd binary *is not* setuid 0.

Thanks

> I'm not sure if this is a configuration problem or a bug, but running
> v2.5.4subver1.413, elogd runs as user ROOT (UID0) even though the following
> is in the elogd.cfd file:
> 
> Usr = nobody
> Grp = essadm
> 
> All other directives added to the cfg file work, so I know eLog is reading
> the cfg file.  
> 
> The elogd binary *is not* setuid 0.

I could not reproduce your problem with the current version (Revision 1.460)
under Linux. I guess you made sure that user "nobody" and group "essadm" exist.
Try to run elogd interactively, if you see any error message (without "-D"
flag). In the most recent version (1.460), I added some more debugging code
which tells you if elogd successfully fell back to another user, if you use the
"-v" (verbose) flag.

If all that does not help, I guess it's some peculiarity of Solaris. Maybe
someone else using Solaris has some idea. All elogd does is a call to 

setuser("<user>");

I see no reason why this should not work on Solaris.

> > I'm not sure if this is a configuration problem or a bug, but running
> > v2.5.4subver1.413, elogd runs as user ROOT (UID0) even though the following
> > is in the elogd.cfd file:
> > 
> > Usr = nobody
> > Grp = essadm
> > 
> > All other directives added to the cfg file work, so I know eLog is reading
> > the cfg file.  
> > 
> > The elogd binary *is not* setuid 0.
> 
> I could not reproduce your problem with the current version (Revision 1.460)
> under Linux. I guess you made sure that user "nobody" and group "essadm" exist.
> Try to run elogd interactively, if you see any error message (without "-D"
> flag). In the most recent version (1.460), I added some more debugging code
> which tells you if elogd successfully fell back to another user, if you use the
> "-v" (verbose) flag.
> 
> If all that does not help, I guess it's some peculiarity of Solaris. Maybe
> someone else using Solaris has some idea. All elogd does is a call to 
> 
> setuser("<user>");
> 
> I see no reason why this should not work on Solaris.

Ok, just checking.  I will fiddle around with running it interactively and see what
I get, plus I'll have a look at the setuser function under Solaris.

Just for grins, what version of compiler are you using under Linux?

Thanks again!

> Just for grins, what version of compiler are you using under Linux?

gcc 3.2.2 (from RedHat Linux 9.0)

> > Just for grins, what version of compiler are you using under Linux?
> 
> gcc 3.2.2 (from RedHat Linux 9.0)

Well, I am running 2.95.3 - hmmm.  We have 3.3.2 - perhaps I'll try that and
see if there is a difference.