Imagemagick not working on Ubuntu, posted by scott on Wed Apr 24 12:55:25 2024
|
Hi Team,
I have set up Elog on the Ubuntu server using the compile and install method. I have installed ImageMagick and GhostScript along with that.
You can find "ImageMagick detected" mentioned in the service status provided below:
=======================================================================
● elogd.service - The ELOG Server
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/elogd.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
Active: active (running) since Tue 2024-04-23 08:59:50 UTC; 1 day 1h ago
Docs: man:elogd(8)
man:elog(8)
Main PID: 858 (elogd)
Tasks: 1 (limit: 9365)
Memory: 163.5M
CPU: 25.825s
CGroup: /system.slice/elogd.service
└─858 /usr/local/sbin/elogd -D -c /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
Apr 23 08:59:50 server1.com systemd[1]: Starting The ELOG Server...
Apr 23 08:59:50 server1.com elogd[858]: elogd 3.1.5 built Mar 21 2024, 17:20:15
Apr 23 08:59:50 server1.com systemd[1]: Started The ELOG Server.
Apr 23 08:59:50 server1.com elogd[858]: revision fe60aaf0
Apr 23 08:59:50 server1.com elogd[858]: CKeditor detected
Apr 23 08:59:51 server1.com elogd[858]: ImageMagick detected
Apr 23 09:00:08 server1.com elogd[858]: Server listening on port 8080
=======================================================================
root@server1# identify -version
Version: ImageMagick 6.9.11-60 Q16 x86_64 2021-01-25 https://imagemagick.org
Copyright: (C) 1999-2021 ImageMagick Studio LLC
License: https://imagemagick.org/script/license.php
Features: Cipher DPC Modules OpenMP(4.5)
Delegates (built-in): bzlib djvu fftw fontconfig freetype heic jbig jng jp2 jpeg lcms lqr ltdl lzma openexr pangocairo png tiff webp wmf x xml zlib
=======================================================================
However, the ImageMagick was found to be not working on my logbook. See the below error on the logbook.
Cannot create thumbnail, please check ImageMagick installation
I have attached a screenshot for reference.
Please could someone help me how to solve this?
Many thanks,
Scott
|
Extendable list of numeric items, posted by Nick Sauerwein on Mon Apr 8 15:46:49 2024
|
Hey eloggers,
I am setting up an ELOG to log the cleanroom fabrication in our startup (Luxtelligence SA). The fabrication is structured in different process steps that are performed by several wafers at the same time (each wafer as an ID).
I am looking for an possibility to put a list of several integers as one of the attributes.
Here an example:
Attributes = Batch ID, Wafer IDs
Type Batch ID = numeric
Type Wafer IDs = extendable list of numeric values
Does something like this exsist?
Thanks in advance for your help. |
Re: Extendable list of numeric items, posted by John Kelly on Mon Apr 8 17:08:11 2024
|
Hi Nick,
If I understand your question correctly maybe this might help:
Search for 'attribute' and you will find this:
"some attributes may be pre-filled from system variables (like your user name). Pre-filled attributes may be still editable or read-only (like the entry creation date.
Attributes may be text fields (limited to 100 characters), list-boxes (max. 100 values), or check-boxes. There is also a special type of attribute where several values are listed on a line with check-boxes, and you can check as many values as needed."
I guess this above is like creating an attribute field, that has attribute names. I *thought* there was a way to leave attributes open where users could create their own 'attribute' names, but the information above is all of what I remember from my past in depth work with Elog.
John
Nick Sauerwein wrote: |
Hey eloggers,
I am setting up an ELOG to log the cleanroom fabrication in our startup (Luxtelligence SA). The fabrication is structured in different process steps that are performed by several wafers at the same time (each wafer as an ID).
I am looking for an possibility to put a list of several integers as one of the attributes.
Here an example:
Attributes = Batch ID, Wafer IDs
Type Batch ID = numeric
Type Wafer IDs = extendable list of numeric values
Does something like this exsist?
Thanks in advance for your help.
|
|
Re: Extendable list of numeric items, posted by Nick Sauerwein on Mon Apr 8 17:23:00 2024
|
Hi John,
thanks for the info =). Do you known whether there is an example of how to use the list-boxes attributes?
Best,
Nick
John Kelly wrote: |
Hi Nick,
If I understand your question correctly maybe this might help:
Search for 'attribute' and you will find this:
"some attributes may be pre-filled from system variables (like your user name). Pre-filled attributes may be still editable or read-only (like the entry creation date.
Attributes may be text fields (limited to 100 characters), list-boxes (max. 100 values), or check-boxes. There is also a special type of attribute where several values are listed on a line with check-boxes, and you can check as many values as needed."
I guess this above is like creating an attribute field, that has attribute names. I *thought* there was a way to leave attributes open where users could create their own 'attribute' names, but the information above is all of what I remember from my past in depth work with Elog.
John
Nick Sauerwein wrote: |
Hey eloggers,
I am setting up an ELOG to log the cleanroom fabrication in our startup (Luxtelligence SA). The fabrication is structured in different process steps that are performed by several wafers at the same time (each wafer as an ID).
I am looking for an possibility to put a list of several integers as one of the attributes.
Here an example:
Attributes = Batch ID, Wafer IDs
Type Batch ID = numeric
Type Wafer IDs = extendable list of numeric values
Does something like this exsist?
Thanks in advance for your help.
|
|
|
Re: Extendable list of numeric items, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Tue Apr 9 04:46:36 2024
|
I think what you want already exists, for example, when I reply to this message, there is this "Category" selection box with predefined answers
"Info", "Bug report", etc. For your case, replace "Category" with "Wafer type ID", replace "Info" with "1", "Bug report" with "2", etc. You numeric
values will be strings containing numbers "1", "2", etc. That works for you? K.O. |
Re: Extendable list of numeric items, posted by Nick Sauerwein on Tue Apr 9 09:25:01 2024
|
Hey,
thanks for your answer. I completely get your point. However, I think my question as not precise enough.
I would like to have a numeric input, but many at the same time. When I make a new post, I would like to have an attribute 'wafer_IDs' that specifies the list of wafers this process has been performed with. So for a single post I would like to have a list like this:
wafer_IDs = numeric value, numeric value, numeric value, extendable
Note: I am not referring here to the option. The numeric values are freely chooses numbers, the only this that varies from post to post is the number of numeric values put.
Let me make an example (If the attribute were a string this would be the equivalent):
1st post: A process that was run with 3 wafers (ID: 1000, ID: 1001 and ID: 1002):
wafer IDs = 1000, 1001, 1002
2nd post: A process that is run with 2 wafers (ID: 1000 and ID: 1002):
wafer IDs = 1000, 1002
The string solves the issue, but is not as nice as having directly a list of integers.
Thanks for your help!
Best,
Nick |
Re: Extendable list of numeric items, posted by Nick Sauerwein on Fri Apr 19 12:30:52 2024
|
Hey eloggers,
does anyone have an answer to this question?
Thanks for the help.
Best,
Nick
> Hey,
>
> thanks for your answer. I completely get your point. However, I think my question as not precise enough.
>
> I would like to have a numeric input, but many at the same time. When I make a new post, I would like to have an attribute 'wafer_IDs' that specifies the list of wafers this
process has been performed with. So for a single post I would like to have a list like this:
>
> wafer_IDs = numeric value, numeric value, numeric value, extendable
>
> Note: I am not referring here to the option. The numeric values are freely chooses numbers, the only this that varies from post to post is the number of numeric values put.
>
> Let me make an example (If the attribute were a string this would be the equivalent):
>
> 1st post: A process that was run with 3 wafers (ID: 1000, ID: 1001 and ID: 1002):
> wafer IDs = 1000, 1001, 1002
>
> 2nd post: A process that is run with 2 wafers (ID: 1000 and ID: 1002):
> wafer IDs = 1000, 1002
>
> The string solves the issue, but is not as nice as having directly a list of integers.
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Best,
>
> Nick |
Re: Extendable list of numeric items, posted by David Pilgram on Sat Apr 20 18:47:37 2024
|
I have replied to this entry, because, for some reason I don't understand, if I reply to your latest entry, I am
automatically logged out. I tried this multiple times, and also on many other entries and had no issues other than
entry 69787 - any reason for this, Stefan?
Anyway, what about MOptions? That appears to do what your example, and needs two lines in elog.cfg file:
Moptions WaferID = 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005
Extendable Options = WaferID
I've done a couple of quick tests on a test logbook I keep for such experimentation, and it appears to do all
you have asked of it. I added a new option 1006. However, I found that one has to add that new one on its own,
let the entry become proper, and then edit the entry to add the other, existing, values. If you tick entries and
also add a new one, then your new entry is all those listed on their own, that is you would get and new entry
in the config file such as "1002 | 1004 | 1006", rather than just 1006
This is probably an result of an unexpected use of Moptions and extendable options, rather than a bug per se.
> Hey,
>
> thanks for your answer. I completely get your point. However, I think my question as not precise enough.
>
> I would like to have a numeric input, but many at the same time. When I make a new post, I would like to have an attribute 'wafer_IDs' that specifies the list of wafers this process has been performed with. So for a single post I would like to have a list like this:
>
> wafer_IDs = numeric value, numeric value, numeric value, extendable
>
> Note: I am not referring here to the option. The numeric values are freely chooses numbers, the only this that varies from post to post is the number of numeric values put.
>
> Let me make an example (If the attribute were a string this would be the equivalent):
>
> 1st post: A process that was run with 3 wafers (ID: 1000, ID: 1001 and ID: 1002):
> wafer IDs = 1000, 1001, 1002
>
> 2nd post: A process that is run with 2 wafers (ID: 1000 and ID: 1002):
> wafer IDs = 1000, 1002
>
> The string solves the issue, but is not as nice as having directly a list of integers.
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Best,
>
> Nick |
Suggestion to update Mac OS X instructions in ELOG Administrator's Guide, posted by Andreas Warburton on Sat Mar 9 17:17:02 2024
|
The section of the ELOG Administrator's Guide https://elog.psi.ch/elog/adminguide.html describing how to build and install ELOG on a Mac OS X system has worked well for me for several years, even though there have been warnings that the "load" and "unload" subcommands of the "launchctl" command have been deprecated for some time. After trying my luck again on a new Mac with the latest operating system, I encountered errors of the type "Load failed: 5: Input/output error" when attempting to follow these instructions.
After a bit of searching around, I used information at the page https://www.alansiu.net/2023/11/15/launchctl-new-subcommand-basics-for-macos/ to deploy the more current subcommands as follows:
sudo launchctl enable system/ch.psi.elogd
sudo launchctl bootstrap system /Library/LaunchDaemons/ch.psi.elogd.plist
sudo launchctl disable system/ch.psi.elogd
Once the above can be verified, perhaps the instructions in the Administrator's Guide can be updated accordingly.
|
Re: Suggestion to update Mac OS X instructions in ELOG Administrator's Guide, posted by Andreas Warburton on Sun Mar 10 04:25:43 2024
|
Here's a more complete/correct set of the updated commands:
sudo launchctl enable system/ch.psi.elogd
sudo launchctl bootstrap system /Library/LaunchDaemons/ch.psi.elogd.plist
sudo launchctl bootout system /Library/LaunchDaemons/ch.psi.elogd.plist
sudo launchctl disable system/ch.psi.elogd
Cheers,
Andreas
Andreas Warburton wrote: |
The section of the ELOG Administrator's Guide https://elog.psi.ch/elog/adminguide.html describing how to build and install ELOG on a Mac OS X system has worked well for me for several years, even though there have been warnings that the "load" and "unload" subcommands of the "launchctl" command have been deprecated for some time. After trying my luck again on a new Mac with the latest operating system, I encountered errors of the type "Load failed: 5: Input/output error" when attempting to follow these instructions.
After a bit of searching around, I used information at the page https://www.alansiu.net/2023/11/15/launchctl-new-subcommand-basics-for-macos/ to deploy the more current subcommands as follows:
sudo launchctl enable system/ch.psi.elogd
sudo launchctl bootstrap system /Library/LaunchDaemons/ch.psi.elogd.plist
sudo launchctl disable system/ch.psi.elogd
Once the above can be verified, perhaps the instructions in the Administrator's Guide can be updated accordingly.
|
|
Re: Suggestion to update Mac OS X instructions in ELOG Administrator's Guide, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Apr 15 18:05:27 2024
|
Thanks for the info, I updated the adminguide.
Stefan
Andreas Warburton wrote: |
Here's a more complete/correct set of the updated commands:
sudo launchctl enable system/ch.psi.elogd
sudo launchctl bootstrap system /Library/LaunchDaemons/ch.psi.elogd.plist
sudo launchctl bootout system /Library/LaunchDaemons/ch.psi.elogd.plist
sudo launchctl disable system/ch.psi.elogd
Cheers,
Andreas
Andreas Warburton wrote: |
The section of the ELOG Administrator's Guide https://elog.psi.ch/elog/adminguide.html describing how to build and install ELOG on a Mac OS X system has worked well for me for several years, even though there have been warnings that the "load" and "unload" subcommands of the "launchctl" command have been deprecated for some time. After trying my luck again on a new Mac with the latest operating system, I encountered errors of the type "Load failed: 5: Input/output error" when attempting to follow these instructions.
After a bit of searching around, I used information at the page https://www.alansiu.net/2023/11/15/launchctl-new-subcommand-basics-for-macos/ to deploy the more current subcommands as follows:
sudo launchctl enable system/ch.psi.elogd
sudo launchctl bootstrap system /Library/LaunchDaemons/ch.psi.elogd.plist
sudo launchctl disable system/ch.psi.elogd
Once the above can be verified, perhaps the instructions in the Administrator's Guide can be updated accordingly.
|
|
|
Re: Suggestion to update Mac OS X instructions in ELOG Administrator's Guide, posted by Andreas Warburton on Tue Apr 16 13:20:01 2024
|
Hi Stefan, Thanks a lot for implementing the updated commands. I noted that there are a few typos that could cause people confusion if not fixed:
In one case, "launchctl" is misspelled.
Confusingly, I think the two lines containing the 'enable' and 'disable' commands use the contiguous text string "system/ch.psi.elogd" (no space), whereas the two lines containing the 'bootstrap' and 'bootout' commands use the phrase "system /Library/LaunchDaemons/ch.psi.elogd.plist" (note space after 'system').
Many thanks, Andreas W.
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
Thanks for the info, I updated the adminguide.
Stefan
Andreas Warburton wrote: |
Here's a more complete/correct set of the updated commands:
sudo launchctl enable system/ch.psi.elogd
sudo launchctl bootstrap system /Library/LaunchDaemons/ch.psi.elogd.plist
sudo launchctl bootout system /Library/LaunchDaemons/ch.psi.elogd.plist
sudo launchctl disable system/ch.psi.elogd
Cheers,
Andreas
Andreas Warburton wrote: |
The section of the ELOG Administrator's Guide https://elog.psi.ch/elog/adminguide.html describing how to build and install ELOG on a Mac OS X system has worked well for me for several years, even though there have been warnings that the "load" and "unload" subcommands of the "launchctl" command have been deprecated for some time. After trying my luck again on a new Mac with the latest operating system, I encountered errors of the type "Load failed: 5: Input/output error" when attempting to follow these instructions.
After a bit of searching around, I used information at the page https://www.alansiu.net/2023/11/15/launchctl-new-subcommand-basics-for-macos/ to deploy the more current subcommands as follows:
sudo launchctl enable system/ch.psi.elogd
sudo launchctl bootstrap system /Library/LaunchDaemons/ch.psi.elogd.plist
sudo launchctl disable system/ch.psi.elogd
Once the above can be verified, perhaps the instructions in the Administrator's Guide can be updated accordingly.
|
|
|
|
Re: Suggestion to update Mac OS X instructions in ELOG Administrator's Guide, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 16 13:31:02 2024
|
Thanks, fixed.
Stefan
Andreas Warburton wrote: |
Hi Stefan, Thanks a lot for implementing the updated commands. I noted that there are a few typos that could cause people confusion if not fixed:
In one case, "launchctl" is misspelled.
Confusingly, I think the two lines containing the 'enable' and 'disable' commands use the contiguous text string "system/ch.psi.elogd" (no space), whereas the two lines containing the 'bootstrap' and 'bootout' commands use the phrase "system /Library/LaunchDaemons/ch.psi.elogd.plist" (note space after 'system').
Many thanks, Andreas W.
|
|
Draft saved after ~15 minutes, then anything entered a few hours later is ignored, posted by Celeste Torkzaban on Tue Mar 12 09:12:32 2024
|
Hello,
I've noticed that many times, I start an elog and continue editing adding to a few hours later, then I submit and it deletes everything I entered after the last time a draft was saved. I paid more attention and saw that it saves a draft after about a few minutes, and if I wait too long before submitting, it doesn't let me re-save the draft. My workaround is to copy all text before I submit, so if it ignores whatever I entered after the last saved version, I can edit it and paste it back in. Is there a setting someplace that I can change to fix this problem?
Thanks! |
Re: Draft saved after ~15 minutes, then anything entered a few hours later is ignored, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Apr 15 17:53:23 2024
|
That's strange. If you edit a message, indeed a draft is saved every ten seconds or so when you keep typing. In our installations we keep an elog entry typically open for eight hours, then save it at the end of the shift, and everything works fine. Have you tried playing aournd with your config file, like "Restrict edit time" or so? Please also make sure you have the current elog version. I sse you have 3.1.3 which is quit old.
Celeste Torkzaban wrote: |
Hello,
I've noticed that many times, I start an elog and continue editing adding to a few hours later, then I submit and it deletes everything I entered after the last time a draft was saved. I paid more attention and saw that it saves a draft after about a few minutes, and if I wait too long before submitting, it doesn't let me re-save the draft. My workaround is to copy all text before I submit, so if it ignores whatever I entered after the last saved version, I can edit it and paste it back in. Is there a setting someplace that I can change to fix this problem?
Thanks!
|
|
Record date isn't set to current date when replying to elogs, posted by Celeste Torkzaban on Tue Mar 12 09:20:14 2024
|
Hello,
I started using the record date feature in one logbook, since we plan to copy over old entries Joplin/Onenote. When starting a new entry, I see that the record date is automatically set to the current date, but when I reply to an elog, the record date is automatically set to the record date of the elog I'm replying to. Is there a way to fix this?
|
Re: Record date isn't set to current date when replying to elogs, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Apr 15 17:50:20 2024
|
Have you tried the config option "Preset on reply <attribute> = $date". On a reply, the <attribute> will be preset with the current date.
Stefan
Celeste Torkzaban wrote: |
Hello,
I started using the record date feature in one logbook, since we plan to copy over old entries Joplin/Onenote. When starting a new entry, I see that the record date is automatically set to the current date, but when I reply to an elog, the record date is automatically set to the record date of the elog I'm replying to. Is there a way to fix this?
|
|
today date in template, posted by Stefano Lacaprara on Mon Apr 8 10:49:10 2024
|
Hello,
I am using template for some elogbook entries.
Is is possible to automatically change the template using the actual date in some filed.
Something like: the template has a place-holder <start date> and this is replaced with today's date when a new entry is created.
I already have a "date" filed which is automatically filled, but I've been asked to have the date also in the template.
Thanks in advance
Stefano |
Re: today date in template, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Apr 8 11:27:09 2024
|
This is a nice idea, but currently no text substations in templates are implemented. It only works in attributes right now.
Stefan
> Hello,
> I am using template for some elogbook entries.
>
> Is is possible to automatically change the template using the actual date in some filed.
>
> Something like: the template has a place-holder <start date> and this is replaced with today's date when a new entry is created.
>
> I already have a "date" filed which is automatically filled, but I've been asked to have the date also in the template.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Stefano |
Re: today date in template, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Tue Apr 9 04:50:28 2024
|
> This is a nice idea, but currently no text substations in templates are implemented. It only works in attributes right now.
but can it be done by javascript injection? load a custom .js or .html file, in this file run javascript code to root down the DOM tree until you
find the right place, replace .innerHTML with current date?
K.O. |
Re: today date in template, posted by David Pilgram on Tue Apr 9 13:49:51 2024
|
This was given to me by Andreas Luedeke of this parish.
In my elog.cfg file, I have the following:
Preset text = $shell(date '+[%d %b %y]')\n
and this puts at the top of every new thread I make today the following line
[09 Apr 24]
And for the same result for every reply as well, I have in elog.cfg
Prepend on reply = $shell(date '+[%d %b %y]')\n\n----------\n
with the ten dash characters to show the end of the thread, so the reply entry goes above the dashes.
Obviously time, name of day etc can be included by using the strftime codes.
> > This is a nice idea, but currently no text substations in templates are implemented. It only works in attributes right now.
>
> but can it be done by javascript injection? load a custom .js or .html file, in this file run javascript code to root down the DOM tree until you
> find the right place, replace .innerHTML with current date?
>
> K.O. |
Installation with amp on Rocky Linux, posted by Nina Bondarenko on Thu Mar 21 15:23:52 2024
|
Hello all,
I am installing elog on an Rocky Linux instance. Have dependensy problem.
rpm -Uvh elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
Any clues from developers to resolve it and keep the software working. Thank you in advance!
Bests, Nina |
Re: Installation with amp on Rocky Linux, posted by Laurent Jean-Rigaud on Thu Mar 21 19:30:49 2024
|
Hi Nina,
The RPM is built with Kerberos (libber*), LDAP (libldap*) and SSL (libssl*) options. These libs are missing on your system, and rpm command does not take care of dependencies.
Try to install with yum : yum install elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
Normally the missing rpm files should be dlded from RL repo if your host can access to them...
.
Laurent
Nina Bondarenko wrote: |
Hello all,
I am installing elog on an Rocky Linux instance. Have dependensy problem.
rpm -Uvh elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
Any clues from developers to resolve it and keep the software working. Thank you in advance!
Bests, Nina
|
|
Re: Installation with amp on Rocky Linux, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Mar 22 07:41:56 2024
|
Is there a way to install all dependencies automatically? Like if I install a package like "emacs" I get a list of dependencies with are automatically installed:
Dependencies Resolved
====================================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
====================================================================================================================================
Updating:
emacs x86_64 1:24.3-23.el7_9.1 rhel7 2.9 M
Updating for dependencies:
emacs-common x86_64 1:24.3-23.el7_9.1 rhel7 20 M
Transaction Summary
====================================================================================================================================
Upgrade 1 Package (+1 Dependent package)
Total download size: 23 M
Is this ok [y/d/N]:
Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote: |
Hi Nina,
The RPM is built with Kerberos (libber*), LDAP (libldap*) and SSL (libssl*) options. These libs are missing on your system, and rpm command does not take care of dependencies.
Try to install with yum : yum install elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
Normally the missing rpm files should be dlded from RL repo if your host can access to them...
.
Laurent
Nina Bondarenko wrote: |
Hello all,
I am installing elog on an Rocky Linux instance. Have dependensy problem.
rpm -Uvh elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
Any clues from developers to resolve it and keep the software working. Thank you in advance!
Bests, Nina
|
|
|
Re: Installation with amp on Rocky Linux, posted by Laurent Jean-Rigaud on Sat Mar 23 23:51:37 2024
|
Normally it should work. Requirements are set in SPEC file.
$ rpm -qpi --requires elog-3.1.5-20240226.el7.x86_64.rpm
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
config(elog) = 3.1.5-20240226.el7
krb5-libs
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.15)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.8)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libkrb5.so.3()(64bit)
libkrb5.so.3(krb5_3_MIT)(64bit)
liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit)
libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpam.so.0()(64bit)
libpam.so.0(LIBPAM_1.0)(64bit)
libssl.so.10()(64bit)
libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
openldap >= 2.4.1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
The EL7 binary needs the following RPM :
$ ldd /usr/local/sbin/elogd | awk '{print $1}' | while read r ; do rpm -qf /lib64/$r ; done | sort -u
erreur�: fichier /lib64/linux-vdso.so.1�: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
erreur�: fichier /lib64/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2�: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
audit-libs-2.8.5-4.el7.x86_64
cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.26-24.el7_9.x86_64
glibc-2.17-326.el7_9.x86_64
keyutils-libs-1.5.8-3.el7.x86_64
krb5-libs-1.15.1-55.el7_9.x86_64
libcap-ng-0.7.5-4.el7.x86_64
libcom_err-1.42.9-19.el7.x86_64
libgcc-4.8.5-44.el7.x86_64
libselinux-2.5-15.el7.x86_64
libstdc++-4.8.5-44.el7.x86_64
nspr-4.35.0-1.el7_9.x86_64
nss-3.90.0-2.el7_9.x86_64
nss-softokn-freebl-3.90.0-6.el7_9.x86_64
nss-util-3.90.0-1.el7_9.x86_64
openldap-2.4.44-25.el7_9.x86_64
openssl-libs-1.0.2k-26.el7_9.x86_64
pam-1.1.8-23.el7.x86_64
pcre-8.32-17.el7.x86_64
zlib-1.2.7-21.el7_9.x86_64
Almost all of them are installed by ELOG RPM or are already installed by default Redhat profiles.
Nina, do you use right RPM version (el7/8/9) according to Rockylinux one ? El7 rpm can not be installed on RL9...
Bye
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Is there a way to install all dependencies automatically? Like if I install a package like "emacs" I get a list of dependencies with are automatically installed:
Dependencies Resolved
====================================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
====================================================================================================================================
Updating:
emacs x86_64 1:24.3-23.el7_9.1 rhel7 2.9 M
Updating for dependencies:
emacs-common x86_64 1:24.3-23.el7_9.1 rhel7 20 M
Transaction Summary
====================================================================================================================================
Upgrade 1 Package (+1 Dependent package)
Total download size: 23 M
Is this ok [y/d/N]:
Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote: |
Hi Nina,
The RPM is built with Kerberos (libber*), LDAP (libldap*) and SSL (libssl*) options. These libs are missing on your system, and rpm command does not take care of dependencies.
Try to install with yum : yum install elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
Normally the missing rpm files should be dlded from RL repo if your host can access to them...
.
Laurent
Nina Bondarenko wrote: |
Hello all,
I am installing elog on an Rocky Linux instance. Have dependensy problem.
rpm -Uvh elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
Any clues from developers to resolve it and keep the software working. Thank you in advance!
Bests, Nina
|
|
|
|
Re: Installation with amp on Rocky Linux, posted by scott on Mon Mar 25 10:18:55 2024
|
Is there an RPM available for Rocky 8 or Rocky 9?
And checking over https://elog.psi.ch/elog/download/RPMS/ , only el7 is found. Is that the right place to look for EL8 or EL9 based RPM?
Thanks,
Scott
Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote: |
Normally it should work. Requirements are set in SPEC file.
$ rpm -qpi --requires elog-3.1.5-20240226.el7.x86_64.rpm
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
config(elog) = 3.1.5-20240226.el7
krb5-libs
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.15)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.8)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libkrb5.so.3()(64bit)
libkrb5.so.3(krb5_3_MIT)(64bit)
liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit)
libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpam.so.0()(64bit)
libpam.so.0(LIBPAM_1.0)(64bit)
libssl.so.10()(64bit)
libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
openldap >= 2.4.1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
The EL7 binary needs the following RPM :
$ ldd /usr/local/sbin/elogd | awk '{print $1}' | while read r ; do rpm -qf /lib64/$r ; done | sort -u
erreur�: fichier /lib64/linux-vdso.so.1�: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
erreur�: fichier /lib64/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2�: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
audit-libs-2.8.5-4.el7.x86_64
cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.26-24.el7_9.x86_64
glibc-2.17-326.el7_9.x86_64
keyutils-libs-1.5.8-3.el7.x86_64
krb5-libs-1.15.1-55.el7_9.x86_64
libcap-ng-0.7.5-4.el7.x86_64
libcom_err-1.42.9-19.el7.x86_64
libgcc-4.8.5-44.el7.x86_64
libselinux-2.5-15.el7.x86_64
libstdc++-4.8.5-44.el7.x86_64
nspr-4.35.0-1.el7_9.x86_64
nss-3.90.0-2.el7_9.x86_64
nss-softokn-freebl-3.90.0-6.el7_9.x86_64
nss-util-3.90.0-1.el7_9.x86_64
openldap-2.4.44-25.el7_9.x86_64
openssl-libs-1.0.2k-26.el7_9.x86_64
pam-1.1.8-23.el7.x86_64
pcre-8.32-17.el7.x86_64
zlib-1.2.7-21.el7_9.x86_64
Almost all of them are installed by ELOG RPM or are already installed by default Redhat profiles.
Nina, do you use right RPM version (el7/8/9) according to Rockylinux one ? El7 rpm can not be installed on RL9...
Bye
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Is there a way to install all dependencies automatically? Like if I install a package like "emacs" I get a list of dependencies with are automatically installed:
Dependencies Resolved
====================================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
====================================================================================================================================
Updating:
emacs x86_64 1:24.3-23.el7_9.1 rhel7 2.9 M
Updating for dependencies:
emacs-common x86_64 1:24.3-23.el7_9.1 rhel7 20 M
Transaction Summary
====================================================================================================================================
Upgrade 1 Package (+1 Dependent package)
Total download size: 23 M
Is this ok [y/d/N]:
Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote: |
Hi Nina,
The RPM is built with Kerberos (libber*), LDAP (libldap*) and SSL (libssl*) options. These libs are missing on your system, and rpm command does not take care of dependencies.
Try to install with yum : yum install elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
Normally the missing rpm files should be dlded from RL repo if your host can access to them...
.
Laurent
Nina Bondarenko wrote: |
Hello all,
I am installing elog on an Rocky Linux instance. Have dependensy problem.
rpm -Uvh elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
Any clues from developers to resolve it and keep the software working. Thank you in advance!
Bests, Nina
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Installation with amp on Rocky Linux, posted by Laurent Jean-Rigaud on Mon Mar 25 10:55:43 2024
|
Hi,
The ELOG website provides new link to RPM packages :
Linux binaries are distributed as RPMs.
EL8/EL9 RPM are also available.
scott wrote: |
Is there an RPM available for Rocky 8 or Rocky 9?
And checking over https://elog.psi.ch/elog/download/RPMS/ , only el7 is found. Is that the right place to look for EL8 or EL9 based RPM?
Thanks,
Scott
Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote: |
Normally it should work. Requirements are set in SPEC file.
$ rpm -qpi --requires elog-3.1.5-20240226.el7.x86_64.rpm
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
config(elog) = 3.1.5-20240226.el7
krb5-libs
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.15)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.8)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libkrb5.so.3()(64bit)
libkrb5.so.3(krb5_3_MIT)(64bit)
liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit)
libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpam.so.0()(64bit)
libpam.so.0(LIBPAM_1.0)(64bit)
libssl.so.10()(64bit)
libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
openldap >= 2.4.1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
The EL7 binary needs the following RPM :
$ ldd /usr/local/sbin/elogd | awk '{print $1}' | while read r ; do rpm -qf /lib64/$r ; done | sort -u
erreur�: fichier /lib64/linux-vdso.so.1�: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
erreur�: fichier /lib64/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2�: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
audit-libs-2.8.5-4.el7.x86_64
cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.26-24.el7_9.x86_64
glibc-2.17-326.el7_9.x86_64
keyutils-libs-1.5.8-3.el7.x86_64
krb5-libs-1.15.1-55.el7_9.x86_64
libcap-ng-0.7.5-4.el7.x86_64
libcom_err-1.42.9-19.el7.x86_64
libgcc-4.8.5-44.el7.x86_64
libselinux-2.5-15.el7.x86_64
libstdc++-4.8.5-44.el7.x86_64
nspr-4.35.0-1.el7_9.x86_64
nss-3.90.0-2.el7_9.x86_64
nss-softokn-freebl-3.90.0-6.el7_9.x86_64
nss-util-3.90.0-1.el7_9.x86_64
openldap-2.4.44-25.el7_9.x86_64
openssl-libs-1.0.2k-26.el7_9.x86_64
pam-1.1.8-23.el7.x86_64
pcre-8.32-17.el7.x86_64
zlib-1.2.7-21.el7_9.x86_64
Almost all of them are installed by ELOG RPM or are already installed by default Redhat profiles.
Nina, do you use right RPM version (el7/8/9) according to Rockylinux one ? El7 rpm can not be installed on RL9...
Bye
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Is there a way to install all dependencies automatically? Like if I install a package like "emacs" I get a list of dependencies with are automatically installed:
Dependencies Resolved
====================================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
====================================================================================================================================
Updating:
emacs x86_64 1:24.3-23.el7_9.1 rhel7 2.9 M
Updating for dependencies:
emacs-common x86_64 1:24.3-23.el7_9.1 rhel7 20 M
Transaction Summary
====================================================================================================================================
Upgrade 1 Package (+1 Dependent package)
Total download size: 23 M
Is this ok [y/d/N]:
Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote: |
Hi Nina,
The RPM is built with Kerberos (libber*), LDAP (libldap*) and SSL (libssl*) options. These libs are missing on your system, and rpm command does not take care of dependencies.
Try to install with yum : yum install elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
Normally the missing rpm files should be dlded from RL repo if your host can access to them...
.
Laurent
Nina Bondarenko wrote: |
Hello all,
I am installing elog on an Rocky Linux instance. Have dependensy problem.
rpm -Uvh elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
Any clues from developers to resolve it and keep the software working. Thank you in advance!
Bests, Nina
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Installation with amp on Rocky Linux, posted by scott on Mon Mar 25 16:19:02 2024
|
Hi,
Thanks for the links to EL8/EL9.
Does this package support LDAP and SSL as well?
Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote: |
Hi,
The ELOG website provides new link to RPM packages :
Linux binaries are distributed as RPMs.
EL8/EL9 RPM are also available.
scott wrote: |
Is there an RPM available for Rocky 8 or Rocky 9?
And checking over https://elog.psi.ch/elog/download/RPMS/ , only el7 is found. Is that the right place to look for EL8 or EL9 based RPM?
Thanks,
Scott
Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote: |
Normally it should work. Requirements are set in SPEC file.
$ rpm -qpi --requires elog-3.1.5-20240226.el7.x86_64.rpm
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
config(elog) = 3.1.5-20240226.el7
krb5-libs
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.15)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.8)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libkrb5.so.3()(64bit)
libkrb5.so.3(krb5_3_MIT)(64bit)
liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit)
libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpam.so.0()(64bit)
libpam.so.0(LIBPAM_1.0)(64bit)
libssl.so.10()(64bit)
libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
openldap >= 2.4.1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
The EL7 binary needs the following RPM :
$ ldd /usr/local/sbin/elogd | awk '{print $1}' | while read r ; do rpm -qf /lib64/$r ; done | sort -u
erreur�: fichier /lib64/linux-vdso.so.1�: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
erreur�: fichier /lib64/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2�: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
audit-libs-2.8.5-4.el7.x86_64
cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.26-24.el7_9.x86_64
glibc-2.17-326.el7_9.x86_64
keyutils-libs-1.5.8-3.el7.x86_64
krb5-libs-1.15.1-55.el7_9.x86_64
libcap-ng-0.7.5-4.el7.x86_64
libcom_err-1.42.9-19.el7.x86_64
libgcc-4.8.5-44.el7.x86_64
libselinux-2.5-15.el7.x86_64
libstdc++-4.8.5-44.el7.x86_64
nspr-4.35.0-1.el7_9.x86_64
nss-3.90.0-2.el7_9.x86_64
nss-softokn-freebl-3.90.0-6.el7_9.x86_64
nss-util-3.90.0-1.el7_9.x86_64
openldap-2.4.44-25.el7_9.x86_64
openssl-libs-1.0.2k-26.el7_9.x86_64
pam-1.1.8-23.el7.x86_64
pcre-8.32-17.el7.x86_64
zlib-1.2.7-21.el7_9.x86_64
Almost all of them are installed by ELOG RPM or are already installed by default Redhat profiles.
Nina, do you use right RPM version (el7/8/9) according to Rockylinux one ? El7 rpm can not be installed on RL9...
Bye
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Is there a way to install all dependencies automatically? Like if I install a package like "emacs" I get a list of dependencies with are automatically installed:
Dependencies Resolved
====================================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
====================================================================================================================================
Updating:
emacs x86_64 1:24.3-23.el7_9.1 rhel7 2.9 M
Updating for dependencies:
emacs-common x86_64 1:24.3-23.el7_9.1 rhel7 20 M
Transaction Summary
====================================================================================================================================
Upgrade 1 Package (+1 Dependent package)
Total download size: 23 M
Is this ok [y/d/N]:
Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote: |
Hi Nina,
The RPM is built with Kerberos (libber*), LDAP (libldap*) and SSL (libssl*) options. These libs are missing on your system, and rpm command does not take care of dependencies.
Try to install with yum : yum install elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
Normally the missing rpm files should be dlded from RL repo if your host can access to them...
.
Laurent
Nina Bondarenko wrote: |
Hello all,
I am installing elog on an Rocky Linux instance. Have dependensy problem.
rpm -Uvh elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
Any clues from developers to resolve it and keep the software working. Thank you in advance!
Bests, Nina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Installation with amp on Rocky Linux, posted by Laurent Jean-Rigaud on Mon Mar 25 16:44:03 2024
|
Yes, same build options are used.
But i can not'confirm that they are working as well as on EL7. The tests done by build script on CI/CD are quite simple and limited to rpm installation, service start and access from cmdline to elog server.
So thanks to report your personal experience with EL8/9 builds... 🤓
.
Laurent
scott wrote: |
Hi,
Thanks for the links to EL8/EL9.
Does this package support LDAP and SSL as well?
Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote: |
Hi,
The ELOG website provides new link to RPM packages :
Linux binaries are distributed as RPMs.
EL8/EL9 RPM are also available.
scott wrote: |
Is there an RPM available for Rocky 8 or Rocky 9?
And checking over https://elog.psi.ch/elog/download/RPMS/ , only el7 is found. Is that the right place to look for EL8 or EL9 based RPM?
Thanks,
Scott
Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote: |
Normally it should work. Requirements are set in SPEC file.
$ rpm -qpi --requires elog-3.1.5-20240226.el7.x86_64.rpm
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
config(elog) = 3.1.5-20240226.el7
krb5-libs
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.15)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.8)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libkrb5.so.3()(64bit)
libkrb5.so.3(krb5_3_MIT)(64bit)
liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit)
libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpam.so.0()(64bit)
libpam.so.0(LIBPAM_1.0)(64bit)
libssl.so.10()(64bit)
libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
openldap >= 2.4.1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
The EL7 binary needs the following RPM :
$ ldd /usr/local/sbin/elogd | awk '{print $1}' | while read r ; do rpm -qf /lib64/$r ; done | sort -u
erreur�: fichier /lib64/linux-vdso.so.1�: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
erreur�: fichier /lib64/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2�: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
audit-libs-2.8.5-4.el7.x86_64
cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.26-24.el7_9.x86_64
glibc-2.17-326.el7_9.x86_64
keyutils-libs-1.5.8-3.el7.x86_64
krb5-libs-1.15.1-55.el7_9.x86_64
libcap-ng-0.7.5-4.el7.x86_64
libcom_err-1.42.9-19.el7.x86_64
libgcc-4.8.5-44.el7.x86_64
libselinux-2.5-15.el7.x86_64
libstdc++-4.8.5-44.el7.x86_64
nspr-4.35.0-1.el7_9.x86_64
nss-3.90.0-2.el7_9.x86_64
nss-softokn-freebl-3.90.0-6.el7_9.x86_64
nss-util-3.90.0-1.el7_9.x86_64
openldap-2.4.44-25.el7_9.x86_64
openssl-libs-1.0.2k-26.el7_9.x86_64
pam-1.1.8-23.el7.x86_64
pcre-8.32-17.el7.x86_64
zlib-1.2.7-21.el7_9.x86_64
Almost all of them are installed by ELOG RPM or are already installed by default Redhat profiles.
Nina, do you use right RPM version (el7/8/9) according to Rockylinux one ? El7 rpm can not be installed on RL9...
Bye
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Is there a way to install all dependencies automatically? Like if I install a package like "emacs" I get a list of dependencies with are automatically installed:
Dependencies Resolved
====================================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
====================================================================================================================================
Updating:
emacs x86_64 1:24.3-23.el7_9.1 rhel7 2.9 M
Updating for dependencies:
emacs-common x86_64 1:24.3-23.el7_9.1 rhel7 20 M
Transaction Summary
====================================================================================================================================
Upgrade 1 Package (+1 Dependent package)
Total download size: 23 M
Is this ok [y/d/N]:
Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote: |
Hi Nina,
The RPM is built with Kerberos (libber*), LDAP (libldap*) and SSL (libssl*) options. These libs are missing on your system, and rpm command does not take care of dependencies.
Try to install with yum : yum install elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
Normally the missing rpm files should be dlded from RL repo if your host can access to them...
.
Laurent
Nina Bondarenko wrote: |
Hello all,
I am installing elog on an Rocky Linux instance. Have dependensy problem.
rpm -Uvh elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64
Any clues from developers to resolve it and keep the software working. Thank you in advance!
Bests, Nina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Problem in logging with LDAP and passwd, posted by Stefano Lacaprara on Mon Feb 22 12:29:16 2021
|
Dear experts,
I have a logbook which has authentication as follow
Authentication = LDAP, File
Password file = PASSWD.file
LDAP server = ldaps://it-ldap-XXX.XXX.XX:1636
LDAP userbase = ou=people,ou=RGY,o=XXX,c=XX
LDAP login attribute = uid
LDAP register = 0
Self register = 0
Allow password change = 0
Some of the my user (but not all) have issue in accessing this protected elogbook.
The ldap password is correct (we checked).
What I see in the log is as follow:
22-Feb-2021 11:25:51 [XXX.YYY.ZZZ.QQ] {Beam Run} LOGIN user "USERNAME" (attempt)
22-Feb-2021 11:25:59 [XXX.YYY.ZZZ.QQ] {Beam Run} LOGIN user "USERNAME" (attempt)
The user USERNAME is present in PASSWD.file.
For other user, for which the login works, I do see an (attempt) and then (success)
we tried the standard stuff: clear cache/cookies and with different browser. We also tried to remove the user from PASSWD.file and
create it again, but nothing has worked.
Any suggestion how I can debug this problem?
Thanks in advance,
Stefano |
Re: Problem in logging with LDAP and passwd, posted by Sebastian Schenk on Tue Mar 2 16:03:48 2021
|
Dear Stefano,
the support for the LDAP is limited. As stated in the documentation "on an as-is basis".
We use the AD of our university, but I had to re-write a part of the elog auth.c to match the LDAP-tags, so this could also be a issue.
As for your question.
If some of the logins a working fine, then the other ones could have issues with the DN string, maybe...
Your 2 lines of the logfile output show 2 (attempt) directly after each other.
There should be some lines regarding LDAP in between.
I get the (attempt) and directly (success) case only for FILE authentication.
If you have left out these lines on purpose, ignore the following suggestion.
Is it possible that you have previously used FILE authentication for the users, who could login via LDAP successfully?
If yes, delete a user in passwd.file, which could successfully login via LDAP and let them login again.
This should prove, that there is no artifact from previous FILE authentication.
An other idea may be, check if the users have non-standard characters in their name, mail or password.
e.g. I had problems with german umlauts and your mail ends in it, so there could be some other special charaters.
I hope, I could help.
Best wishes,
Sebastian
> Dear experts,
> I have a logbook which has authentication as follow
>
> Authentication = LDAP, File
> Password file = PASSWD.file
> LDAP server = ldaps://it-ldap-XXX.XXX.XX:1636
> LDAP userbase = ou=people,ou=RGY,o=XXX,c=XX
> LDAP login attribute = uid
> LDAP register = 0
> Self register = 0
> Allow password change = 0
>
> Some of the my user (but not all) have issue in accessing this protected elogbook.
> The ldap password is correct (we checked).
> What I see in the log is as follow:
>
> 22-Feb-2021 11:25:51 [XXX.YYY.ZZZ.QQ] {Beam Run} LOGIN user "USERNAME" (attempt)
> 22-Feb-2021 11:25:59 [XXX.YYY.ZZZ.QQ] {Beam Run} LOGIN user "USERNAME" (attempt)
>
> The user USERNAME is present in PASSWD.file.
>
> For other user, for which the login works, I do see an (attempt) and then (success)
>
> we tried the standard stuff: clear cache/cookies and with different browser. We also tried to remove the user from PASSWD.file and
> create it again, but nothing has worked.
>
> Any suggestion how I can debug this problem?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Stefano |
Re: Problem in logging with LDAP and passwd, posted by Laurent Jean-Rigaud on Fri Mar 5 01:43:20 2021
|
Hi,
It seems that ELOG does not support LDAPS but only simple LDAP connection.
Regards |
Re: Problem in logging with LDAP and passwd, posted by Sebastian Schenk on Fri Mar 5 13:54:13 2021
|
Hi,
we use the LDAPS connection in our setup and it works without issues.
You have to specify "LDAP server = ldaps://server.tld:port" and normally it uses a different port (636) than insecure LDAP (389).
Best wishes,
Sebastian |
Re: Problem in logging with LDAP and passwd, posted by Laurent Jean-Rigaud on Sun Mar 14 17:02:49 2021
|
Hi Sebastian,
Nice to hear !
So i retried some tests and in fact, as my NAS LDAP is using self-signed certificate, connexion is refused by openldap libs from ELOG (ldap_simple_bind_s Can't contact LDAP server).
By disabling certificates verification in ldap.cfg on ELOG VM, i could connect using LDAPS URL...
Maybe it should be an option to add in elog.conf... :-)
Thanks for information,
Laurent
|
Re: Problem in logging with LDAP and passwd, posted by scott on Tue Mar 19 16:58:52 2024
|
Hi Stefano,
I also tried to set up LDAP authentication and password file-based authentication using the same settings as yours, which is not working as expected. It does work only with the LDAP authentication and not with the password file now. If I remove the LDAP-based parameters from the configuration file it works then password files start working.
I think multiple ways of authentication do not work concurrently.
Is that issue still existing for you or is it resolved?
Thanks,
Scott
----
> Dear experts,
> I have a logbook which has authentication as follow
>
> Authentication = LDAP, File
> Password file = PASSWD.file
> LDAP server = ldaps://it-ldap-XXX.XXX.XX:1636
> LDAP userbase = ou=people,ou=RGY,o=XXX,c=XX
> LDAP login attribute = uid
> LDAP register = 0
> Self register = 0
> Allow password change = 0
>
> Some of the my user (but not all) have issue in accessing this protected elogbook.
> The ldap password is correct (we checked).
> What I see in the log is as follow:
>
> 22-Feb-2021 11:25:51 [XXX.YYY.ZZZ.QQ] {Beam Run} LOGIN user "USERNAME" (attempt)
> 22-Feb-2021 11:25:59 [XXX.YYY.ZZZ.QQ] {Beam Run} LOGIN user "USERNAME" (attempt)
>
> The user USERNAME is present in PASSWD.file.
>
> For other user, for which the login works, I do see an (attempt) and then (success)
>
> we tried the standard stuff: clear cache/cookies and with different browser. We also tried to remove the user from PASSWD.file and
> create it again, but nothing has worked.
>
> Any suggestion how I can debug this problem?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Stefano |
|