Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 213 of 796  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show only new entries    6362 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 212, 213, 214 ... 794, 795, 796   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Emailup Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  65966   Mon Sep 8 23:17:59 2008 Question Herman Shermandsherma1@mscd.eduQuestionLinux Is there a way to limit users to view only the entries they have created?

We are using elog to allow users to enter their time spent on a project and we would like them to be able to see the entries that they themselves have

created but not the entries that other users have created.

Thanks,

Herman

  65972   Tue Sep 9 16:12:45 2008 Reply Herman Shermandsherma1@mscd.eduQuestionLinux Re: Is there a way to limit users to view only the entries they have created?

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 

Herman Sherman wrote:

We are using elog to allow users to enter their time spent on a project and we would like them to be able to see the entries that they themselves have

created but not the entries that other users have created.

Thanks,

Herman

 

 In that case you have to make one logbook per user and restrict the access to it using the "Login user = ..." directive.

 I understand.

Thank you for the quick response.

  1155   Sat May 21 15:05:23 2005 Entry David Spindlerdsspindler@earthlink.netBug reportWindows2.6.0-betaIncorrect Display
I hope this is the correct place for an apparent bug report. The display is incorrect except when displaying a particular entry. I just downloaded 2.6.0-beta thinking I was getting 2.5.9. Nice surprise. The elcode (bbcode? ) is a great idea, but the display, when showing the main screen of a logbook does not have the correct fields showing in the correct places. I will attach two screen captures for illustraton. Never mind, I guess not. It is not letting me upload the screen captures. On the main screen, for example, my field contents for "Route" appear in the "Text" field. But when on the specific entry screen, these field contents are in the correct field. I will be glad to eamil the screen captures, if anyone wants.

I am running Firefox 1.0.3 (same results with IE 6, BTW), on a WinXP OS (sorry fellows, but I am still in process of learning Linux, so I have not tried this version of elog on it, yet), on a Gateway 2.2 GHZ, 1 GB RAM PC.


BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively.
Attachment 1: capture-firefox-1.03.JPG
capture-firefox-1.03.JPG
  1156   Sat May 21 15:23:08 2005 Entry David Spindlerdsspindler@earthlink.netBug reportWindows2.6.0-betaRe: Incorrect Display

David Spindler wrote:
I hope this is the correct place for an apparent bug report. The display is incorrect except when displaying a particular entry. I just downloaded 2.6.0-beta thinking I was getting 2.5.9. Nice surprise. The elcode (bbcode? ) is a great idea, but the display, when showing the main screen of a logbook does not have the correct fields showing in the correct places. I will attach two screen captures for illustraton. Never mind, I guess not. It is not letting me upload the screen captures. On the main screen, for example, my field contents for "Route" appear in the "Text" field. But when on the specific entry screen, these field contents are in the correct field. I will be glad to eamil the screen captures, if anyone wants.

I am running Firefox 1.0.3 (same results with IE 6, BTW), on a WinXP OS (sorry fellows, but I am still in process of learning Linux, so I have not tried this version of elog on it, yet), on a Gateway 2.2 GHZ, 1 GB RAM PC.


BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively.


I guess it did upload. Here is the other screen capture.

BTW, I received the following message upon submitting my last post:
Quote:
"Error sending Email via "mailsend.psi.ch": malformed address: <>"
Attachment 1: capture-firefox-1.03-log-entry.JPG
capture-firefox-1.03-log-entry.JPG
  1157   Mon May 23 17:47:24 2005 Entry David Spindlerdsspindler@earthlink.netBug reportWindows2.6.0-betaRe: Incorrect Display
Never mind. I figured it out. I used two fields (date and time) that are automatically placed in elog. It messed up the spacing, altough what was puzzling was that it displayed correctly on the entry itself, but not the list. Anyway, I renamed the date and time to another name and it is ok.

Thanks, anyway. Keep up the good work.


David Spindler wrote:

David Spindler wrote:
I hope this is the correct place for an apparent bug report. The display is incorrect except when displaying a particular entry. I just downloaded 2.6.0-beta thinking I was getting 2.5.9. Nice surprise. The elcode (bbcode? ) is a great idea, but the display, when showing the main screen of a logbook does not have the correct fields showing in the correct places. I will attach two screen captures for illustraton. Never mind, I guess not. It is not letting me upload the screen captures. On the main screen, for example, my field contents for "Route" appear in the "Text" field. But when on the specific entry screen, these field contents are in the correct field. I will be glad to eamil the screen captures, if anyone wants.

I am running Firefox 1.0.3 (same results with IE 6, BTW), on a WinXP OS (sorry fellows, but I am still in process of learning Linux, so I have not tried this version of elog on it, yet), on a Gateway 2.2 GHZ, 1 GB RAM PC.


BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively.


I guess it did upload. Here is the other screen capture.

BTW, I received the following message upon submitting my last post:
Quote:
"Error sending Email via "mailsend.psi.ch": malformed address: <>"
  1423   Tue Oct 4 19:40:27 2005 Question David Spindlerdsspindler@earthlink.netQuestionWindows2.5.7Re: Can't use the command-line client
I have a similar problem. I am using Windows version, and whenever I use the elog client to send entry, it will not take with MOptions set. I usually have 2 attributes required (both MOptions), and I get the message that it is missing a required attribute. When I use ROptions, or Options, it works fine. Is there a problem with MOptions, or am I perhaps using a badly formatted commandline?

Commandline as follows: C:\elog>elog -h IP_ADR -p 80 -l gbld -u username password -a Type=Other -a Operator=SCADA -a Category=Controls -a Subject=Alarm "Please ignore."

Type and Category are required and MOptions.

Below is the pertinent part of the config file:

;***** Attribute Section
Attributes = Log Date, Operator, Type, Category, Engine, Work Order #, EPN, Fuel Tank 1 (A&B), Fuel Tank 2 (C&D), Engine Hours Stop, Engine Hours Start, Email To, Subject

Comment EPN = (Equipment Piece Number)
Comment Fuel Tank 1 (A&B) = (West)
Comment Fuel Tank 2 (C&D) = (East)

MOptions Type = Alarm, Trouble, ESP, Haz. Wx.,Problem, PM, Routine, Load Test, Other
MOptions Category = Engine, Generator, Controls, Fuel, Oil, HV Switchgear, MLG&W, Other
Options Engine = All, 1A, 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A, 1B, 2B, 3B, 4B, 5B, 1C, 2C, 3C, 4C, 5C, 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, A Bus, B Bus, C Bus, D Bus, A&B Busses, C&D Busses, West Gen (001), East Gen (002)

Required Attributes = Type, Category, Subject

If time permits, I would appreciate any help possible.

BTW, I like the additional elcode.
  1424   Tue Oct 4 20:24:26 2005 Reply David Spindlerdsspindler@earthlink.netQuestionWindows2.5.7Re: Can't use the command-line client
I just noticed in the changelog that my apparent problem with MOptions may have been fixed. I will try a newer version and see if it works.
  1425   Tue Oct 4 20:33:05 2005 Reply David Spindlerdsspindler@earthlink.netQuestionWindows2.5.7Re: Can't use the command-line client

David Spindler wrote:
I just noticed in the changelog that my apparent problem with MOptions may have been fixed. I will try a newer version and see if it works.


It did.

Keep up the good work.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 212, 213, 214 ... 794, 795, 796   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-fe60aaf