elog.exe cmd line - seems to just hang, posted by eric wooten on Fri Jul 25 02:02:48 2003
|
elog -h 192.168.0.25 -p 80 -l Database -a Type=test1 -a OS=W2K -a Loc=room1
-a Status=operational
|
|
Re: elog.exe cmd line - seems to just hang, posted by eric wooten on Fri Jul 25 02:03:37 2003
|
Note: When I hit ctrl-break, it exits to cmd prompt, and the entry appears
in the logbook.... ?
|
|
Re: elog.exe cmd line - seems to just hang, posted by eric wooten on Fri Jul 25 02:07:08 2003
|
opps nevermind, i didn't realize I had to put something in for the ending
body text. Anyway to skip that part?
|
Re: elog.exe cmd line - seems to just hang, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jul 25 08:51:22 2003
|
> opps nevermind, i didn't realize I had to put something in for the ending
> body text. Anyway to skip that part?
>
|
Bottom text = <file> not displayed in every screen?, posted by R. Beekman on Tue Jul 22 16:21:51 2003
|
I tried to add a file with the "Bottom text = <file>" option.
Although one would suggest that the bottom text file is included in every
|
|
Re: Bottom text = <file> not displayed in every screen?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jul 24 15:10:14 2003
|
> I tried to add a file with the "Bottom text = <file>" option.
>
> Although one would suggest that the bottom text file is included in every
|
|
Email Notification, posted by Robert Keeney on Mon Jun 30 14:15:52 2003
|
Is there a way to configure elog so users that have their email notification
on only get notified for updates to logs they have access to? I've looked
all through the documentation and I can't seem to find a way to do this.
|
|
Re: Email Notification, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jun 30 17:07:03 2003
|
> Is there a way to configure elog so users that have their email notification
> on only get notified for updates to logs they have access to? I've looked
> all through the documentation and I can't seem to find a way to do this.
|
Re: Email Notification, posted by Robert Keeney on Mon Jun 30 20:29:43 2003
|
You guessed right. I give it a try soon as I get a chance. Thanks.
> I guess you have a global password file and use "login user" statements for
|
|
Re: Email Notification, posted by Robert Keeney on Wed Jul 23 12:53:25 2003
|
I have had this installed for about two weeks now and it seems to be working
fine. I haven't seen any problems at all and none of the other users have
reported any.
|
|
Modify the date of an entry?, posted by Gary Cramblitt on Tue Jul 15 23:37:58 2003
|
Great program! Thank you.
Short of manually editing the logbook files, is there a way I can change the
|
|
Re: Modify the date of an entry?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 16 08:32:35 2003
|
> Short of manually editing the logbook files, is there a way I can change the
> date of an entry? I want to transfer my "Linux Journal", which I have been
> writing as a regular document for several months, into elog so I can take
|
|
Re: Modify the date of an entry?, posted by Gary Cramblitt on Wed Jul 16 21:21:52 2003
|
> > Short of manually editing the logbook files, is there a way I can change the
> > date of an entry? I want to transfer my "Linux Journal", which I have been
> > writing as a regular document for several months, into elog so I can take
|
|
Re: Modify the date of an entry?, posted by Gary Cramblitt on Wed Jul 16 21:31:26 2003
|
> > > Short of manually editing the logbook files, is there a way I can change the
> > > date of an entry? I want to transfer my "Linux Journal", which I have been
> > > writing as a regular document for several months, into elog so I can take
|
|
Re: Modify the date of an entry?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jul 17 10:28:22 2003
|
> I figured out how to hide columns, using the "Display search" parameter. (BTW,
> suggest you modify the Administrator manual to mention that "Display search" applies
> to the initial display as well as any "Find"s. I had seen this, but assumed it
|
|
Re: Modify the date of an entry?, posted by Gary Cramblitt on Fri Jul 18 01:58:10 2003
|
> > I figured out how to hide columns, using the "Display search" parameter. (BTW,
> > suggest you modify the Administrator manual to mention that "Display search" applies
> > to the initial display as well as any "Find"s. I had seen this, but assumed it
|
|
REQ: Preset attribute with current weeknumber. possible?, posted by R. Beekman on Tue Jul 15 12:21:27 2003
|
| Is it possible to preset an attribute with the current weeknumber? |
|
Re: REQ: Preset attribute with current weeknumber. possible?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 15 12:47:49 2003
|
> Is it possible to preset an attribute with the current weeknumber?
No. All you can do is
|
Currently being edited option has gone, posted by nickc1 on Thu Jul 10 10:11:41 2003
|
In the current source which ive compiled and am using on our elog system,
the feature that you put in for me that says "Entry is currently being
edited by Joe Bloggs on 192.168.0.10" has vanished.
|
|
Re: Currently being edited option has gone, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jul 10 13:02:53 2003
|
> In the current source which ive compiled and am using on our elog system,
> the feature that you put in for me that says "Entry is currently being
> edited by Joe Bloggs on 192.168.0.10" has vanished.
|
|
Re: Currently being edited option has gone, posted by nickc1 on Fri Jul 11 11:09:10 2003
|
| Excellent thanks |
HTML page formating, posted by Tomas Rudolf on Mon May 19 23:54:09 2003 
|
Is there a possibility to integrate into ELOG some more features in terms
of page formating?
|
|
Re: HTML page formating, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 4 15:52:52 2003
|
Thank you very much for your request, well motivated and described. I hope I
will soon find time to impelment this. |
|
Re: HTML page formating, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jul 4 20:46:16 2003
|
I implemented your request. The syntax is:
Format <attribute> = <flags>,<css_class_name>,<css_class_value>,<width>,<size>
|
|
Re: HTML page formating, posted by Tomas Rudolf on Fri Jul 4 21:26:03 2003
|
Very interesting, indeed!
Thank you very much for the implementation. I believe this is a big step ahead
in terms of ELOG screen formating (and therefore easier/more ergonomic
|
runtime error under Mac OS X 10.2, posted by Joseph Giaime on Mon Jun 30 00:11:09 2003
|
I have been trying to build and run elog under Mac OS X 10.2.6, without sucess. I
understand that this is not one of the 'supported' platforms, but I hope that there is someone
here who might know the work-around to my problem.
|
|
Re: runtime error under Mac OS X 10.2, posted by Sridhar Anandakrishnan on Mon Jun 30 02:12:24 2003
|
Joe,
Run the command
|
Re: runtime error under Mac OS X 10.2, posted by Joseph Giaime on Mon Jun 30 05:15:14 2003
|
Sridhar & Recai,
Thanks to both of you for the rapid and effective advice. Fixing the limit corrected my problem.
|
|
Re: runtime error under Mac OS X 10.2, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jun 30 17:16:56 2003
|
> I suppose that the advice to increase Mac OS X's default stacksize limit
> might make a fine entry in the FAQ or README file.
|
|
Re: runtime error under Mac OS X 10.2, posted by Recai Oktas on Mon Jun 30 02:41:33 2003
|
Seems a stack problem. I don't have an OS X box to validate my guess. I've
made a Google search with the keywords: EXC_BAD_ACCESS stack "os x"
|